Council flavour in electorate seats

Two past and present Tauranga City Councillors are eyeing a central government role with both announcing intentions to run for party candidacy to represent Tauranga in this year's general election.

First-term city councillor Steve Morris and former councillor Murray Guy have both put forward their names for the National Party's Bay of Plenty seat, and NZ First's Tauranga candidacy, respectively.

City councillor Steve Morris is running for National Party candidacy in the Bay of Plenty seat.

Former city councillor Murray Guy is seeking nomination at Tauranga's NZ First candidate.

For Steve, the move comes just six months after successfully winning the Papamoa/Mount Maunganui seat alongside Clayton Mitchell in the local body elections.

He says although the timing is not ideal, he could not pass up the opportunity made possible after current BOP MP Tony Ryall announced he was retiring from politics at the end of the term.

'I didn't think the opportunity would come up for quite some time. What really convinced me was I had quite a lot of comment from people who were suggesting that we need a strong local voice,” says Steve.

'Whilst the timing is not ideal the opportunity may not come up for another 10 to 15 years and so I decided to take the opportunity now.”

Steve's nomination sees him join Fonterra executive Todd Muller and about six others in competing for the vacant National Party candidacy.

Despite looking to leave council after such a short stint and the potential negative view the public might have on a by-election, expected to cost $70,000, Steve is confident he will still represent the same people if elected.

'On reflection I think it's representing the same people if I was successful at a higher level and I think that it's in the best interest of our city as a whole to have a strong local candidate so that's why I'm putting my name forward.”

Steve says putting his name forward is not something he took lightly. He spoke with fellow councillors and Mayor Stuart Crosby about his decision.

'Stuart actually asked me after Tony resigned whether I was considering and I said ‘yes I was'. He was saying ‘look this is just the normal part of the democratic process'.”

Former city councillor Murray Guy is throwing his hat into the ring for the Tauranga electorate under the NZ First banner, as he aims for a heftier role in politics. Murray lost his seat at TCC after 12 years in last year's October election.

'Clearly 12 years at council I was continually battling my head against a bureaucracy that didn't share my thoughts and vision and here is an opportunity with the support of NZ First to make a difference,” says Murray.

'I have never seriously considered a political involvement other than city councillor until more recent times, as in very recent in fact. Primarily that's because as a city councillor I was able to, and maintain, a clear independent approach to the role.

'I confess to a concern that during my 12 years as a city councillor I never once had a sitting MP from any party approach me just to ask how they could assist me in my role.”

Murray admits the political passion has been building after he was approached to speak to the party's members the day after Tauranga City Council election results were released.

Walking away from the meeting, Murray says he felt totally comfortable with standing in front and representing the party's members, who he believes also share his with my political philosophies.

'We were subsequently spoken to by NZ First who I know have spoken to a number of different people, initially we were extremely hesitant because of those preconditions,” says Murray.

'But the more I considered the option that being a NZ First candidate offered I'm recognising now that there are real opportunities to make a real difference around here.”

You may also like....

17 comments

Predictable

Posted on 31-03-2014 12:58 | By The Sage

Before I even read this article in full I knew Murray Guy would be one that was putting his name forward. Get a real job Murray and give up on any sort of Government or Local Body work. The sign could read "Murray Guy for National," Yea, right!


Rastus

Posted on 31-03-2014 13:37 | By rastus

I always found this guy (no pun intended) ready to listen and consider a proposal and was sorry when he dipped out at the local body elections - those who supported the false rhetoric of some of the successful candidates are now ruing their decision. At least you knew where you stood with 'Guy' so all power to you Mr Guy and best wishes for a successful bid.


Don't care where as long as I'm there?

Posted on 31-03-2014 15:06 | By Phailed1

Seems amazing how quickly people can defect from one long held ambition to another. Well I guess that the aspired for position pays about three times as much as council plus plenty of perks. So perhaps Steve could offer to pay the by-election cost (if it came to that)? The interesting thing will be if they fail to get to Parliament will they come back tail between legs begging for re-election to "serve" as councillors???


And here was I thinking!!!

Posted on 31-03-2014 16:18 | By Sambo Returns

that you Steve stood for ethics and morality, and the "boy next store" image,I have always been a believer that the ones that think they are so pious, are the ones who are not, you should stand down immediately from Council, and have no "back door" clause to be able to get back in, we will have an expensive by-election, and move on, how will you have time to run a campaign, and do your Council occupation at the same time?, I do not want to fund your political aspirations.


Vanity trip?

Posted on 31-03-2014 17:23 | By dstewart

Its funny how some people cannot let go and realise that they are not indispensible


Typically Negative Response...

Posted on 31-03-2014 17:29 | By Paul Melhuish

Here we go again with the negative bandwagon. Come on, as Cr Morris has stated, he didn't see the opportunity coming up for years to have a go at moving to central government..hardly his fault is it? And Rastus, be more specific, which councillors and attached rhetoric are you referring to?


Phailed1

Posted on 31-03-2014 17:32 | By YOGI BEAR

yes, should pay for the by-election cost, only fair perhaps. Although the retirement of Ryal was not expected. You can not blame them all for jumping at this one as it is a gimme for a National candidate. Then just a case of how long do you want to stay there.


@phailed1

Posted on 31-03-2014 19:41 | By Papamoaner

You are always so negative, cynical and subjective. As usual Phailed, you add nothing constructive to the argument. What's wrong with constructive ambition? Does it somehow offend you? Or is it just old fashioned sour grapes? Good luck to both candidates. They both have a track record of hard work and long hours.


Well done

Posted on 31-03-2014 19:55 | By Mountchick

It's called opportunity, you need to grab it when it comes by. I say well done Steve! You have a heart for the community and I know you will do well. Don't let the negative comments get to you.


Steve

Posted on 01-04-2014 09:00 | By Capt_Kaveman

will fit into Nat very well since instead of cutting costs to fit he supports an increase of 6.7% on rates, if your family budget runs out you cant just go upto your boss and demand $20 a wk more


Boy next store?

Posted on 01-04-2014 15:19 | By Paul Melhuish

Sambo, please enlighten us on what exactly a 'boy next store' is. I for one, am very curious. Glad to see not all folk have a pre-programmed negativity gene on this site and can see things from another, more balanced, non moany point of view. Well done Mountchick and Papamoaner.


@Paul Melhuish!!!

Posted on 02-04-2014 08:50 | By Sambo Returns

Funny you have not heard the saying!!!, it means basically a squeaky clean image, where the worst thing you have done is possibly skipping Sunday School, to sneak down the road to get an ice-cream, I do not expect people like your self who are wrapped up in bureaucratic cotton wool, to actually be able to think outside a square!!, and you have not even replied to the question about, why the ratepayers should fund his national political campaign?, he should resign now, for the sake of transparency,or is ripping of the ratepayers no moral dilemma!!!, if you pledge to support your constituents, campaign on "righting wrongs", and standing up for your supporters, then 6 months later....ooops I have had a better offer, does not speak that highly of ones character, you made your choice Steve, either stick it out, or resign NOW!!!!


Sambo

Posted on 04-04-2014 13:41 | By Paul Melhuish

I would perhaps take you slightly seriously if firstly you didn't hide behind a pseudonym. You, like most of the people who spout on about whatever on here, cowardly hide behind one. So before you shout with your 3 exclamation marks at me, man up and become an actual person. Secondly, the saying you are referring to is 'boy next door'...get it right...and I might get you an ice cream on the way back from Sunday school!


@Paul Melhuish!!!

Posted on 04-04-2014 18:18 | By Sambo Returns

How presumptuous and arrogant of you to think my name is a pseudonym, and my Mother(Mrs Returns to you)always warned me about accepting sweets from strangers, especially ones heading home from Sunday School, cowardly??? once again do not be presumptuous, also why not just answer the original statement, not cowardly avoid it, and to your supporters spouting on about opportunities, try this analogy.... Steve made a commitment to his constituents,so should see out his term, commitment and marriage, if everyone saw another opportunity during marriage, there would be no such thing.


Sambo

Posted on 04-04-2014 22:52 | By Paul Melhuish

Steve Morris would like to serve the region in a different capacity at central government level and the opportunity arose now...he isn't heading off to open a brothel on Devonport Road or deciding that it really isn't for him. These things happen all the time in any work situation including political ones. He is an employee, not anyones servant. Other councillors are still running business's while in council, are you on their case as well for having divided interests? You don't seem to like Cr Morris, and to be frank it sounds a bit personal. If you are that upset about it though, put your name forward if a position does eventuate and lets see what you've got.


Paul, a little (big) correction

Posted on 07-04-2014 11:04 | By Murray.Guy

Your comment, 'He is an employee, not anyones servant' is incorrect. A City Councillor, the Mayor, is NOT an employee, he is an independent service provider (self employed) that applies to 'SERVE' the community through an election process. The application to 'serve' is for a three year term with an undertaking to apply specific and non-specific skills and attributes, outcomes, on behalf of the community and to it's benefit. Being an elected member NOT supposed to be about self-serving (a concept D Stewart fails to grasp), but indeed, to serve!


Not how we (the public) see it

Posted on 07-04-2014 14:15 | By Paul Melhuish

Murray, seems to me once you have been elected you are paid on a base salary therefore in employment as the job is not done for charity. However if you wish, you can substitute service provider for employee but I think the point is mute. Please also note I that used the term 'servant' and not 'to serve'. They have quite different connotations. I am well aware that councillors are elected 'to serve'. Cheers.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.