Councillor asks public to decide fate

Tauranga City councillor Clayton Mitchell is putting the choice of whether he stays in his current role if elected to parliament this September in the hands of the people of the city.

Following being named Tauranga's NZ First candidate last month – and stating he'll keep his councillor job if he makes it to the Beehive – Clayton's been plagued by allegations he'll be double-dipping and taking on a workload too tough for most dignitaries.


Tauranga City councillor Clayton Mitchell. Photo: Bruce Barnard.

The 42-year-old says if elected into a Government coalition he will resign, but if he gets into opposition he wants to the public to decide the fate of his council role.

People can vote on SunLive as to what he should do – stay or go?

'The result of this poll will be binding,” says Clayton. 'That goes by our policies at NZ First of wanting to introduce binding referendum; I'll stick with what the people say.”

The first thing he wishes to clear up is the allegation the Mayor wants him to stand down if elected.

'It always gets back to what Mayor Stuart Crosby was quoted in the media – but he was misquoted.

'I spoke to Stuart the morning of the announcement, and he was in full support. We both agreed then I would give it six months and if I couldn't do the job I would stand down.”

Clayton says a role in politics was never on the cards when he ran for TCC. His motivation for parliament is to gain additional power to bring positive change to Tauranga.

'I never had a political radar. I always had a political opinion, but never had I thought one day I would be a politician.”

He says it was approaching NZ First about local issues as a TCC councillor that led to the appointment.

'I'm very passionate about what I want to do locally. Council has a lot to do and say about what happens, but they're ultimately driven by legislation at the top end.

'That's why I think having a conduit in council and government is a real win-win.”

Clayton's driving force was pushing for Government to take Route K's $63 million debt from TCC, an issue solved this week when NZTA announced it would pay all but $1m of the debt.

Other top local issues include removing the Rena wreck, securing safe tsunami escape routes and implementing a proven youth/business operation to get more young people in the workforce.

'I think we need someone fighting and being tenacious about the issues effecting people from Tauranga.”

Clayton, who has owned seven businesses and managed more than 250 staff, says balancing roles has never been a difficulty. He also says it was never about the money and is promising to give up his $70,000 council salary if elected.

'I won't be taking a salary from TCC if I'm elected, he says. I want it to be clear my position is one of passion, not payment.”

He sold his Mount Maunganui business Ivory when he was elected into TCC and will consider selling his other bar Mount Mellick if the need arises after September, he says.

His council position is a '30-plus hour job a week”. He's in council chambers three-four days a week, and meeting with constituents outside that.

'Yes, if I go down to Wellington three days a week 30 weeks of the year I won't be in town, but it doesn't mean I can't come back and work Friday to Monday.

Clayton's first priority is as a husband to wife Erika and father to his three children aged three, six and eight.

He believes he can juggle all roles to the benefit of Tauranga and has the full support of his family.

'I love Tauranga and I love this work. I'm up until 2am emailing and doing things; I don't sleep a lot, and I'm confident I can do this.

'But I want the people of Tauranga to have their say, and at the end of the day I will listen to them.”

To have your say on Clayton's decision vote here.

The poll will close midday Friday, September 5.

You may also like....

7 comments

2nd choice.

Posted on 22-08-2014 12:22 | By Kiri Upoko

Why would we even want him to remain in council if he isn't elected or listed into parliament. The thing is Tauranga is obviously his 2nd choice.


I didn't realize

Posted on 22-08-2014 14:25 | By How about this view!

that this gentleman was involved in the liquor industry. I guess this means that Winston first and his cohort of sleepers will not support raising the drinking age again if this should ever make-it back into the debating chamber? Parliament with Winston first will allow Mr Clayton PLENTY of time to run as many businesses as he wishes, as our unelected members of parliament (those that have never WON a seat in parliament, rather than being GIVEN one to make up the numbers) only turn up to warm the seats, if they can be bothered to attend and come out of hibernation with their hands out in two and a half years time claiming to have made a difference. Hah. We don't need the alcohol industry represented in council either. We have enough irresponsibility in attendance already.


Agree with Kiri

Posted on 22-08-2014 16:32 | By carpedeum

He would not be able to do justice to both roles at the sane time-BOTH need 100% commitment- or is he only working at 50% capacity for the Council at present already???


Neither!

Posted on 22-08-2014 16:41 | By YOGI BEAR

Best option of all.


Really?

Posted on 22-08-2014 22:14 | By Bobby

Golly, what a bunch of haters! Does it not occur to you lot that having a councillor who is also an MP might just mean that the interests of TGA are better represented? Out of the ragtag bunch of candidates standing in the electorate, he stands head and shoulders above the rest, especially that arrogant smiling pup, 'Simple Simon' Bridges. If he has Winstons' vote, then he also has mine.


poll shmoll

Posted on 23-08-2014 08:43 | By kat.lodge

Clayton, don't pay any heed to these polls, anyone can click on it as many times as they like, so your opposition or their supporters may just click away at it. you've already done a lot of good for Tga from what I've been reading in this rag, so you do as you see fit and what works for you and this towns best interest, don't listen to the naysayers.


Really... REALLY?

Posted on 23-08-2014 09:56 | By Disappointed

Having had family members serve in Parliament and on local Council I know first hand the time and effort required to do justice to their elected positions. For Mr Mitchell to even consider taking up the two roles at the same time is not only an affront to those who voted him in but a belittlement of the devotion that the duties of public office require. This article states a driving force behind his belief in splitting roles is seeing the government take over Route K debt yet his party leader is today quoted in this same paper as saying the deal "stinks". Could this be the first sign of why not to mix the two?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.