Time's up for city bollards

Tauranga city centre's blue bollards are gradually being retired from their long stint protecting pedestrians from unwary drivers.

Between 60-to-70 bollards, which have been in situ for two decades, were taken off the job of protecting pedestrians from drivers last week, as part of a retirement programme implemented by Tauranga City Council.


Bollards are disappearing from Tauranga city centre. Photos: Bruce Barnard.

The blue bollards took up their positions during the $12 million CBD urban redesign project undertaken in the mid-to-late 1990s by Opus consultants.

The design, which included traffic planning, water features and shade structures, also brought in the paved streets, and removed gutters that formerly separated drivers from walkers.

The bollards have done their job, taking casualties mostly late night, and some daytime drivers have failed to negotiate the turns at the bottom of Devonport Road and Willow Street.

But over the last two years the bollards have been gradually relieved of their duty. Up to 60 have been taken from Grey Street, Devonport Road and Willow Street, and the attrition continues.

'They are being removed because they are costly to maintain and they no longer serve any purpose other than to clutter the streetscape,” says Tauranga City council transportation manager Martin Parkes.

'As the bollards have been removed over the past two years we have kept an eye on driver behaviour.

'We have not observed, and have had no complaints about vehicles being driving onto footpaths or endangering pedestrians.”

More bollards will be removed over the next 12 months.

You may also like....

30 comments

Less people, less cars

Posted on 02-03-2015 12:42 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

Sadly both lacking in numbers. Bollards were, however, useful to lean on for the late night drunkards.


Vanillalatte63

Posted on 02-03-2015 13:22 | By vanillalatte63

Shame, I think they provide character to the city centre.


so 1million

Posted on 02-03-2015 13:32 | By Jimmy Ehu

per year to maintain bollards, sounds more like boll**cks to me


Bollards Retire? Bo***cks!

Posted on 02-03-2015 14:17 | By Bill Gibson-Patmore

Quoting SunLive: 'They are being removed because they are costly to maintain and they no longer serve any purpose other than to clutter the streetscape,” says Tauranga City council transportation manager Martin Parkes." - . Someone's opinion that they are "Clutter" does not sound like an expert opinion from a design architect, nor is it everyone's opinion. A few Bollards missing here and there may not be a big issue. However, a couple of hundred potentially "retired" will make a difference. As for "..we have kept an eye on driver behaviour". That doesn't sound particularly like a functional study, nor fact-based research with outcome-projections. Personally, I do not see how this program of removing streetsife decor will improve the look of our city, and it certainly cannot improve SAFETY! Bill Gibson-Patmore


The Other Issue is Asset Managment

Posted on 02-03-2015 14:33 | By Bill Gibson-Patmore

Besides my earlier comment on this "program" of Bollard Removal directly degrading the existing SAFETY of other street users.... I also worry that the assets of the city, once purchased are not being adequately maintained. Normally acceptable business practice is to purchase an asset (as we did twenty years ago), then project a lifespan of that asset, include a maintenance program and a replacement program, so that the use and viability of said asset is maintained for the benefit that originally saw it purchased. I disagree with the apparent notion that "maintenance is costly, therefor divest of all assets." Whether it's an Historic Village, a Begonia House, or a Traffic Bollard, it needs to be maintained. Discarding (TCC says: "retiring") assets so freely is apparently imprudent. Sure, it helps your "bottom line", but devoids our City of amenities. Where will that end?. Probably where we were in 1915. Muppets!..Bill_Gibson-Patmore


Blue Boy

Posted on 02-03-2015 15:13 | By BlueBoy

I think they should do away with some of the human bollards on council would be the place to start. Too busy selling the soul of the city to save every little $ they need to employ people who really know what they are doing. What are they going to sell next?


All of the above ...

Posted on 02-03-2015 15:25 | By chancer

comments are relevant and I wonder how long it will take for the yobo's to discover they can drive up the footpaths once the bollards are removed ?!!


Whos a bollard?

Posted on 02-03-2015 16:03 | By YOGI BEAR

The blue ones actually provide something of use, but otherwise look no different tot eh average TCC staff/official. They don't change their colours, never move for anything, cost a lot to maintain, have a short useful life span and the fate is the same for the lot of em' "scraped". So when is Parkes gunna get the message and follow suit along with the rest of his cronies?


Too Dangerous!!

Posted on 02-03-2015 16:05 | By righto

I had brunch at a café on deveonport rd whilst there for approx. 1hr three cars used the footpath to drive onto then reverse near the car park they wanted and still couldn't get it right A fourth car drove onto the footpath and angle parked in the MC lot Too dangerous for me!!!


Stupidity!

Posted on 02-03-2015 16:40 | By DAD

Why pay a contractor hundreds of Dollars to take them out when it is obvious they are a great to the safety issues. It wont be long before they will have to pay another contractor to put them back in! Can we pull out all fences around swimming pools now? If someone gets hurt and sues the Council that will cost us poor Ratepayers more thousands. If Council don't like maintaining Bollards just take the damaged ones away and leave the rest. I think they are even quite attractive and serving a purpose!


Rastus

Posted on 02-03-2015 18:08 | By rastus

Bovine excreta continues to pour out of the city's administration-every time I read what they are up to I am wondering how they are going to top their stupidity next month - the problem is that we like every other local body keep employing more and more newbies from our Universities and polytechs and history tells us that they actualy know very little about what puts 'heart' in to a city — but of course they always know best and in fact have to continually upset their employers (thats you and me) to try and justify their pathetic existence - it's not rocket science - its just even more bovine excreta.


O.K. smart guys

Posted on 03-03-2015 10:13 | By How about this view!

We see in one of the photos that there is no raised Kerb where these bollards have been placed. So, will we need to install this to keep pedestrians safe and cars out of shop fronts? It seems to me that although they may appear to have limited value, they do, even though it may only be noticed in peripheral sight, define roadway from footpath! Another thought, Is this the first step in introducing the food and dining plaza, mooted last month? (At ratepayers expense of course) Is it REALLY "Clutter" or are these bollards properly defined as road/pedestrian SAFETY measures?


Unbelievable stupidity!!

Posted on 03-03-2015 14:14 | By Mackka

"The bollards have done their job, taking casualties mostly late night, and some daytime drivers have failed to negotiate the turns at the bottom of Devonport Road and Willow Street". Watch out pedestrians - watch out shop fronts!!! They'll spend tens of thousands removing the bollards. Give it a couple of years - a couple of deaths and shop front windows gone - they will be back at double the cost! Each idiot thing this council does is surpassed by something more crazy the following week! MORONS!!


They

Posted on 03-03-2015 14:36 | By Capt_Kaveman

Need to stay


money,bollards.......

Posted on 03-03-2015 17:16 | By Me again

My guess is money wins. to paying for some other ridiculous, unattractive piece of junk. Hang on that will come from our pockets ratepayers, for something that will be torn down in 10 years time, give or take a few years. I wonder if they can find their way out of a paper bag?


DAD

Posted on 03-03-2015 23:03 | By YOGI BEAR

of course taking them out is a really dumb idea, and of course a whole new set of consultants will then be needed to think of some way to fix the problem ... and funny thing mega thousands of rates will be paid yet again to reinstate them all yet again. Such is the life and times of e bureaucrat.


rastus

Posted on 03-03-2015 23:06 | By YOGI BEAR

I can verify that for you to, the evidence is easily obtained. The bovine excreta flows from the lace prolifically. The proof is that the bovine excreta is dank and creates mould, and there we have the proof needed.


How about this view

Posted on 03-03-2015 23:08 | By YOGI BEAR

I agree with your views, the bollards have good value, do no harm except to a wayward vehicle or two. They even save the odd shop front. It is a real shame that the average official can not be dealt with in the same fashion. Cut off at ground level, bungle a bit of concrete in the hole and the end result, never seen again ... an excellent solution.


Mackka

Posted on 03-03-2015 23:10 | By YOGI BEAR

By the article content it seems that they have about 60 odd spares already, so damage should not be hard to remedy, simply swap a bent one for a good one in storage.


Great comments everyone!

Posted on 04-03-2015 07:35 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

It seems we have another good reason not to go to the CBD. The fear of being run over at any time. Add it to the list.


served their purpose

Posted on 04-03-2015 11:00 | By hapukafin

Does that apply to all road barriers if noone is hitting them they have served their purpose too and can be removed from our roads.If there is no bollard along our streets where there is no curbing the first thing a car will hit is a pedestrian,and turning vehicles will use the footpath.


leubert

Posted on 04-03-2015 11:02 | By YOGI BEAR

b=paper bag, no, need consultants to show them the way, and that is the longest way, best fees for that.


No Bollards?

Posted on 04-03-2015 11:22 | By YOGI BEAR

So the trees, light poles and pedestrians will become the replacements right?


No Bollards?

Posted on 04-03-2015 11:55 | By YOGI BEAR

Does that mean that anyone can now park on the curb when ever and however they like? Does that mean the road is now a little wider in some places? Are there car park meters to be installed or are these new car parks free?


Cant believe the stupidity

Posted on 05-03-2015 21:25 | By Raewyn

Do Councilors even get a say in all these stupid ideas that are dreamed up by other stupid employees of Council, or is it about keeping everyone employed at Ratepayers expense!


Raewyn

Posted on 05-03-2015 23:39 | By YOGI BEAR

The later, consultants, design, make, fit, repair and paint, rip them all out, more consultants even for that, dump them ... stage two, repeat ... repeat ... repeat. You may well wonder why your rates are soooooo high. PS Councilors after a short period of indoctrination and reprogramming soon follow the "true" way ... be reasonable do it my way ... you get eh idea.


Overit

Posted on 06-03-2015 15:35 | By overit

Our wise City Fathers eh!!


Overit

Posted on 08-03-2015 12:04 | By YOGI BEAR

You could say that, but I fear it is a gross exaggeration, at least as an implication anyway that they maybe have a clue what they are doing.


Bollard Beasts

Posted on 23-03-2015 11:15 | By ROCCO

I will go with the Mackka assessment on the whole thing which is stupid stupid stupid and an unnecessary waste of time and money.The filling in is also stupidity if ever want to reinstate why not just plug holes with removable tubes- Answer too bloody easy and rational for TCC.


Stupid stupid stupid

Posted on 25-03-2015 15:24 | By YOGI BEAR

What else could it be, that is the reason the idea was created from within TCC, nothing unexpected about that. The amazing thing is that has end up as actually happening. Look I expect a vast array of crazy and silly things to come out of TCC, it is just what they do. One could only hope that they would learn something new after decades of it, but anyway ... one can but hope, but not a lot I am afraid.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.