Crown appeal on home detention sentence denied

Photo: File/SunLive.

A High Court judge says the nine-month home detention sentence for Jayden Meyer, who raped four girls, 'was manifestly inadequate” but has rejected a Crown appeal against the sentence.

Deputy solicitor-general Madeleine Laracy filed the appeal, which crown solicitor Anna Pollett says is 'usual” in Crown appeals against sentences, after outrage following the perceived leniency of the sentence sparked a series of protests in September across Aotearoa in Mount Maunganui, Hamilton, Whanganui, Gisborne and Taupō.

In an appeal ruling issued on Wednesday, Justice Sally Fitzgerald says that the District Court's approach to sentencing had been 'irregular and contrary to established principle” and that an appropriate sentence would have been 'at least three years and five months imprisonment”.

However, she also says 'the Crown's application for leave to appeal out of time is declined”.

Meyer was found guilty in July this year of raping four young women and sexually violating another.

The offending took place during 2020 and 2021, when Meyer was 16 and the girls were 15.

Meyer, now 18, received a nine-month home detention sentence which he is understood to be serving at a family residence in Auckland.

Fitzgerald says several factors led her to dismiss the appeal, including the fact imprisonment now would be 'crushing” for Meyer, he had already served just over a third of his home detention sentence and his engagement in a sexual offending programme.

'The interests of justice are best served by declining the Crown's application for leave to appeal out of time,” she says.

She also outlined why an alternative submission to increase his home detention sentence was also rejected, despite noting she was 'initially attracted to that suggestion”.

'It replaces a manifestly inadequate sentence with another manifestly inadequate sentence. I expect it may also be viewed as an affront to the victims.”

Fitzgerald says the initial sentencing process for Meyer 'lacked transparency, which in turn undermines public confidence in the administration of justice”.

However, she also acknowledged that, until the appeal was filed, 'a sentence of imprisonment had never been suggested as a possible sentence in this case”.

She also says a prison sentence now would have 'a real risk of undermining progress to date in rehabilitation”.

Meyer is serving a nine-month home detention sentence for raping four young women and sexually violating another. Photo: Martin De Ruyter/Stuff.

'This is a particularly important factor in my view,” she says.

'I also take into account that while the seriousness of the offending in this case called for a sentence of imprisonment, home detention is nevertheless the second most restrictive sentence in the hierarchy of sentences.

Fitzgerald also rejected the perception home detention is an 'easy” sentence.

'It is a difficult sentence and highly restrictive of an offenders' liberty.”

She also noted that now Meyer has a number of criminal convictions for serious sexual offending, there will likely be 'long term effects for him”.

'I have not reached this conclusion lightly,” Fitzgerald says.

'I am also acutely aware of the position of the victims. I expect that they and their families will feel aggrieved by this outcome. However, Mr Meyer, and other young men, can be under no illusion that in the ordinary course, serious sexual offending is, absent compelling features, likely to result in a sentence of imprisonment.”

- Benn Bathgate/Stuff.co.nz

6 comments

The law is an ass

Posted on 19-10-2022 19:11 | By AuntyMinnie

Well what a complete mess this case has become. I am sure the culprit will get some karma. I do hope so. Shameful and so disappointing for the victims. The sentence gives the wrong message entirely!!


Sooooo

Posted on 19-10-2022 21:51 | By Yadick

And so the next offender will be absolutely slammed to justify the unjustification of this sentence. It's how the 'justice' system works. Absolutely NO consistency whatsoever. This is absolutely appalling and he walks out of court laughing. So good to know (NOT) that prison numbers are significantly dropping . . . And crime is WAY UP while justified responsibility is out the door. Hey Jacinda NZ is doing so well while you play nuclear advisor and tour the world telling people how good you are. Roll on elections.


No mention

Posted on 20-10-2022 07:34 | By FRANKS

of sanction for the judge who who got it so wrong. No apology to the victims.


Disgraceful!!

Posted on 20-10-2022 08:31 | By The Professor

Like AuntyMinnie says, hopefully this disgusting excuse for a human being will get some karma. Undoubtedly he is feeling quite pleased with himself after learning about this decision. You also have to ask what planet some of our Judges are on. Like someone commented on here several weeks ago, it would have been interesting to see what sentence had been handed down if this crime was against a Judge's daughter of wife.


Shame

Posted on 20-10-2022 12:01 | By Justin T.

Where there are 5 victims known you can pretty much gaurrantee there's another one or two hiding in the shadows hoping to see a good result. Hopefully those victims will put their anger into action, put their hands up in discust with the result and we can see this justifiably go back to court and justice be done correctly.


Hard to follow...

Posted on 21-10-2022 01:46 | By morepork

... the reasoning here. IMO, it all hinges on his attitude and whether that has changed. If he has no remorse and thinks he got off easily, then there's no hope for him. The justice system has certainly failed when we have no recourse but to trust in cosmic Karma to see criminals get their deserts. I endorse FRANKS' point too... Judge and victims were left unserved.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.