Rates rise not unanimous

Tauranga's third rates increase in a row isn't unanimously supported by Tauranga City Councillors.

Catherine Stewart opposed the striking of the rate saying councillors were just going through the motions by accepting it.


Councillor Catherine Stewart voted against the rates rise of about 10 per cent for most homeowners.

'You are not going to get a different cake if you keep on using the same recipe,” says Catherine.

'It's time we got in touch with the real world out there.”

Mayor Stuart Crosby led the charge saying Catherine's comments reflected a lack of understanding; that over the last year councillors have, starting from a possible 16.6 per cent rates increase managed to reduce that by about a third by taking about $33 million out of the capital works programme to keep the rates demand as low as possible.

'We have made every effort to reduce the projected budget this year and there have been significant reductions,” says Stuart.

Tony Christiansen says councillors worked very hard to strip back capital expenditure by $33 million.

'It's not a small amount,” says Tony and, 'now to be told it's not good enough is insulting and disappointing to be honest.”

Murray Guy supports the rate, but wants to flag what he believes is a developing issue of targeted rates for different geographic areas of the city eg The Lakes and Papamoa East.

Terry Molloy says Tauranga should be receiving more benefit from its port shares held by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council.

Bill Faulkner says councils can no longer expect people with property to pay for common services. He was among several councillors wanting to lobby the local government association for changes to the regime under which rates have to be struck.

Catherine Stewart and Rich Curach voted against the rate being struck.

The increase is the third of the infamous triple whammy of successive increases intended to pull the city out of debt.

Three years ago when the option was put to ratepayers the preference was to increase rates instead of what residents will pay for increased council services, such as library charges.

The expectation at the start of the process was that this year's rates increase would be 14.4 per cent, but councillors trimmed $33 million off the capital works budget in the annual plan process.

The uniform annual charge is $670 per rateable unit.

The general rate is $0.00195614 in the dollar on the capital value of each rateable unit.

The economic development rate levied on every commercial property in the city is $0.00045455.

The meted water supply rate is $1.58 per cubic metre. The unmetered water supply charge is $588.

The sewerage charge is $330 for each residential property and $330 for each toilet or urinal in a commercial property.

Properties not connected to the city sewers still have to pay $165.

The Lakes uniform targeted rate for additional levels of service is $244.76 per rateable unit.

The Papamoa targeted rate is also $274.76. The Excelsa targeted rate for that Papamoa subdivision is $129.33.

12 comments

All very well to vote against it

Posted on 23-06-2011 17:02 | By JSmithington

but what are the solutions being offered by councillors Catherine Stewart and Rick Curach. I'd like to know the specifics of where to cut rates as I don't particularly like paying them. Come on Catherine, give us your recipe instead of what I think are half-baked nothings. I agree that rates need to be kept lower, but I have more respect for councillors who have practical solutions. Good on Tony Christiansen for his comments.


Rates Alway were and Always will be a worry.

Posted on 23-06-2011 17:23 | By tabatha

Well put JSmithington, rates are a necessary evil unless we call our area separate to NZ and develop it like Las Vegas and all the gambling pays for everything. That is a real dream, but to prune off the amount they have is great news, expected jump out boy, Pick Rick to be against, this guy needs to engage brain and come with good sensible ideas more often then negative ones. Catherine is trying to please but as put has also no positive alternatives. The city is in debt and there is no real short quick fix.


Well based on what the headline says

Posted on 23-06-2011 20:24 | By Nigel Barker

Congratulations on your stance Catherine *bows* - seems you have what your male cohorts lack. They could go get some of course from The Warehouse ... referred to as Balls. I will read the detail of what you have said Catherine when I have been and purchased some for moi ... balls. Even balls from The Warehouse will be more than what ... ooo never mind. In the course of time there will be sufficient stacks in store at - Citizens Monitoring Council-


30% increase in 3 years...

Posted on 23-06-2011 20:41 | By wreck1080

If the council were a business, they'd be out of business. Nice to know, you can just raise rates on your ratepayers who don't have the same luxury to increase their salaries in one of the biggest recessions in peoples memory. Although, partly in the councils defence it was past councils who underfunded infrastructure. But, the new council still wastes money like no tomorrow. Just take a look at the recent junket trip down to christchurch to see off an ex-employee. It is outrageous and I don't care if it is the norm, about time we made the norm not to follow ex-employees around the country.


council actions

Posted on 24-06-2011 09:46 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

A thing to be noted with how the council operates is they don't advise the rate payers that the rates are going up, we find out through local media...i just phoned the council to find out how much my rates will go up and they could not tell me, i was told I will find out when i receive my next rates bill, so for me who pays monthly to cover the amount, I will not get stung with a bill in August with only 20 days to pay, and if I can't pay in that time (which i know i wont be able to) i will then get a fine!!! This is a discusting way to run a business...if my phone or power company did that to me I would move to another provider. Come on council your policies are really SHOCKING!!!


Council savings

Posted on 24-06-2011 12:19 | By whiskers

I would like to know how much the council saves by receiving from many of its ratepayers a direct credit on a monthly basis for their six monthly invoice.What actually happens to this money which is effectively paid in advance.Does the council invest the money until the actual invoice is due or does the money just roll into the Bank a/c and lower the overdraft interest cost?Perhaps a councillor or the CEO could inform me and other ratepayers.If it isn't doing anything to lower the cost of borrowing by the council then ratepayers should keep the money in a savings account,get some interest on it themselves and pay when the invoice is due.


Duh

Posted on 24-06-2011 15:18 | By aegis

Hey mountchik! The council advises through the media! Did you expect them to send you and every other ratepayer a personalised notice in the mail? What would people say then?? Oooohhh wasting ratepayers money!!!


@ AEGIS

Posted on 24-06-2011 19:31 | By WOMBLE

No mate, they dont, at least the interesting stuff, the good stuff, the stuff that they really dont want you to know. Come on mate we are not all that silly are we, or is it just you?


Vote for the LAZIEST councillors next time

Posted on 25-06-2011 20:08 | By The Tomahawk Kid

If the council stuck to the ESSENTIALS of running a city ONLY, ratepayers could have a 50% rates REDUCTION. The only people who object to this would be the socialist busyboddies who want a say in what others spend THEIR money on, and the do-gooders who want to spend YOUR money on things for YOUR OWN GOOD. Get rid of all the do-gooders - let them spend their efforts on voluntary FUNDRAISING. Dont Vote for people who tell you all the things they want to do - vote for those who tell you all the things they WONT DO. Remove council from spending YOUR entertainment budget, and spend it YOURSELF on things YOU value


GARBAGE IN, GARBAGE OUT!

Posted on 26-06-2011 16:40 | By CONDOR

Slash vital infrastructure work Smithington, - whoever I think you have the wrong end of the stick here, must be a buddy of Mr. aegis (ee-jiss). It is not Crs. C Stewart and R Curach that have a problem or need to prove anything - at least they try their best. You should be attacking the Crosby Tribe that have dropped us ratepayers in it over the last 7 years. Sorry but Cr. Christiansen is an appalling non-event, should try a bit of self-motivation,might work wonders. If think-big projects and Council contracts were policed properly, would save $12 million a year and with a staff audit cutting a further $10 million, that's $22 million p.a. - now tell me our TCC rates can't be reduced or held! Oh, and while on the topic,Mr Crosby concedes and is now saying major projects will be shelved for 3 years and only basic infrastructure work and repairs and maintenance attended to. Hello! Anyone home in the vacuum? This is the only way Tauranga could cope with its liabilities because debt repayment keeps pouring out with the Events Centre and Southern Pipeline still to hit the fan. The current rates increase will not be an 8% or 9% or 10% increase -it will be 11% plus check your rate demand when you get it. What is being floated currently is window dressing and excuses for the looney extravagances. What about the last 9 years of waste? Where are the apologies for all the cock-ups? Don't tell us about our mortal fiscal illness at the bottom of the cliff - not magic wand stuff so tell us how we got there!!


Wasters of public funds

Posted on 27-06-2011 12:58 | By SpeakUp

Mayor Stuart Crosby's leading the charge saying Catherine's comments reflected a lack of understanding reflect actually his own lack of understanding. Remember, Stuart, YOU work for US and not the other way around. Tony Christiansen says, 'now to be told it's not good enough is insulting and disappointing to be honest.” Well, we've got news for you. It will be US to tell YOU what we want to be done and not the other way around. If that's insulting and disappointing to you…tough s#!t. The Regional Council is a rut for carrier bureaucrats, as necessary as … (insert your own annotation) and needs to be scrapped….er, WILL be scrapped. And for the umpteen times: it is NOT services like library charges that have brought this city/district to the brink of financial ruin, but the self-serving bureaucracy for which we pay through the nose. Anybody wanting to know specifics how to fix the mess ought to envisage a cut in management officials and their pay, then a cut in regulations/by-laws and therefore compliance fees, a cleaning up of the many crony side posts (like the CEO of TCAL being the debuty mayor), no more public fund expenditure for private or corporate profit, due diligence in all matters and maybe a certain requirement of caliber to become an administrator of OUR money. SpeakUp -Citizens Monitoring Council-


Provide us with other options

Posted on 28-06-2011 09:01 | By Mike Baker

It is the democratic right of any councillor to vote as they feel but when it comes to rates it is also essential that councillors, that vote against the raterise, also give us, the citizens of Taurangaa, the opportunity to comment on what they would have deleted from the plan in order to keep rates lower. I challenge Cr Catherine Stewart to do this as its all very well to vote against something but its even more important to make their views available as to where they would have made changes. Remember the uproar over the proposed library charges review and following the debate the councillors voted (100%)to retain the status quo but at least the community was given the oppoprtunity to discuss the issue and that's very important. Come on Cr Stewart tell us what you would have changed in the plan and then the community would have the opportunity to either agree or disagree.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.