Dog attacks school bus supervisor

A 61-year-old Tauranga man, who confronted an aggressive dog trying to get onto a school bus in Windermere is in a stable condition in a ward in Tauranga Hospital with serious leg injuries after the dog attacked him.

The pit bull/bull terrier cross was attempting to get onto the Bayline Coach full of school children around 8.30am on Monday when the bus supervisor stepped in and was bitten by the dog.


Photo: File.

He suffered puncture wounds to his right lower leg was taken to Tauranga Hospital where he underwent surgery this morning.

Tauranga City Council animal control services were called to the attack and the dog is now at the pound.

Bayline Coaches manager Jeanette Proctor says this is the second time a dog has approached the bus in this area.

'The employee received quite a significant bite to his right lower leg. He had surgery in hospital this morning.”

The bus was picking up students at the corner of Poike Road and Winderemere Drive when the dog approached the bus and attempted to get on with the school children.

The bus driver phoned his supervisor for help, who then arrived and attempted to lead the dog away from the bus when he was bitten.

Council Animal Services team leader Brent Lincoln says the dog was a pit bull/bull terrier cross.

'Our Animal Services team attended the incident as soon as it was reported to us.

'We have the dog in the pound and have located and contacted the dog's owner.”

Brent says they are now in the process of taking statements from witnesses and the dog's owner and will make a decision on what happens to the dog based on those statements.

'At this stage we can't advise on the outcome.”

'There's only three conditions where we can put it down, one is where the owner surrenders the dog to us, the other is where we can prosecute and the court makes a destruction order, and thirdly if nobody claims a dog and after seven days the dog can be put down.

The only time they are empowered to act is if they are present at the time of the attack and for the purposes of stopping the attack. Once it's in the pound, the council is bound by the Dog Control Act.

Brett is in contact with a person in relation to the dog. He would not say if it was a registered dog.

A witness, who did not wish to be named, also says the dog managed to get onto the bus a couple of weeks ago.

He says it jumped on the bus when the driver opened the door to let the children on.

'It got quite aggressive, it didn't bite anybody.

'Anyway, they managed to get some food and calm it down and get it off the bus. He was down at the bus stop to pick up the children and hello there's the dog there again.

'This time the bus driver didn't open the door. But the dog did jump into a lady's car with some of the children who were waiting at the bus stop.”
According to the witness, the woman got the children out of the car and locked the dog in the car until animal control arrived.

Jeanette says Bayline is in contact with council animal services and says they are being proactive in dealing with the attack.

'They've certainly been quite responsive. Animal services are following it through.

'We will certainly be following it through with our processes to see if there is something we need to implement or look at to ensure the safety of our drivers and children.”
Jeanette believes the attack came out of 'extraordinary circumstances and I don't think we are confronted with this on a regular basis.

'We are certainly taking it quite seriously.”

9 comments

Way beyond a joke

Posted on 21-08-2012 11:36 | By penguin

Put the dog down and harshly punish the owners. The fault is not the dogs. Responsibility lies fair and square with the owners. There is no need for such a breed and as noted once before, the owners are usually people who need a status symbol to make them feel good. Very fortunate that the dog bit the adult (who will now suffer pain and inconvenience) and did not run amok with the kids. I am picking a child will get killed one day. Then what? Someone might be big and brave enough to ban these breeds.


dog

Posted on 21-08-2012 15:18 | By Glen Clova

The owner should be prosecuted and dog put down. I thought there was a city bylaw to say that all dogs of this type had to be muzzled at all times,


ONCE UPON A TIME

Posted on 21-08-2012 18:08 | By Colleen Spiro

It used to be safe to go for a walk in your neighbourhood.. When will someone do something about these breeds.?


Here we go again

Posted on 21-08-2012 18:12 | By Johnney

Firstly the dog owner should not have to decide what to do with the dog. It's has a taste for attacking humans so just put the mongrel down. Secondly the owner needs to be charged and fined appropriately to be a deterrent for other irresponsible dog owners.


Poor Dog, wheres the owner?

Posted on 21-08-2012 20:24 | By katandjarad

ALL everybody does it blame the dog!! its not the breed, its how they are trained or not trained!! Owners need to take responsibility for their dogs...Makes it hard for people like me a responsible dog owner to be able take their dog's anywhere in tga. So dont go bashing the dog or the breed BLAME the OWNER!!


Enough already

Posted on 22-08-2012 08:04 | By lpm67

This is so wrong, this animal must be put down....pity we cant do the same to the owner!!!!


it won't be back

Posted on 22-08-2012 08:15 | By Igi68

The Council are just talking cautiously as most enforcement agencies do so they do not appear to be predetermining outcome. The dog won't be coming out of the pound - either through consent or through the Courts, it will be destroyed and the owner will be fined heavily either way. As for banning - impossible; all that can be done is have strong dog control laws and enforcement generally and a vigilant community that reports all incidents, however minor.


Victims' rights - get real!

Posted on 22-08-2012 10:12 | By penguin

For 'katandjarad” - you are right about the owners of many of these dogs. However, it does not alter the fact that pit-bull crossbreeds (especially with staffy) can be very unpredictable. It's this factor that makes them particularly dangerous, all the more so if they have not been properly trained. Unfortunately, many pit-bull owners do not seem to be capable of correctly training their dogs (some probably don't want to). How come this dog was 'roaming' the streets, anyway? The fact is that Tauranga is ‘awash' with dogs and as 'kiaora2u” says, it used to be safe to go walking in our neighbourhoods. So who ends up with all the rights? The dogs and their owners. This, especially so, when you read of the limitations council officers have in dealing with dangerous dogs! It is amazing that one of these is (quote from Animal Services leader, Brent Lincoln)...”The only time they [officers] are empowered to act is if they are present at the time of the attack and for the purposes of stopping the attack.” Yeah! You can imagine the scenario where you are being mauled by a dog and somehow manage to calmly ring council and invite them to witness the incident!!!! The owner of an attacking dog should forfeit all rights, automatically, at the outset. Where are the rights of the victims in all this, as they face months of recuperation from their injuries?


@igi68

Posted on 25-08-2012 13:55 | By morepork

Impossible? No, it isn't. Simply refuse to license dangerous dogs. How hard is that? (And back this up with automatic termination of unlicensed dogs found roaming the streets, after a 3 day period for people to come forward, in case someone's pet has been picked up without a collar...) Make chipping of licensed dogs mandatory, and this means they can be traced to their rightful owners who must take proper responsibility for them. Please see my post to the thread on the dog which attacked the Police dog, Yoda.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.