Free bus fares future dubious after funding axed

Changes to bus fares are likely after the government pulled its subsidies. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

Free bus fares in Bay of Plenty could be cut back after the government pulled its funding.

Buses have been free for anyone aged 18 or under and half price for 19-24 year olds in Tauranga, Whakatāne, and Rotorua since July last year.

But that is likely to be scaled back after the Government announced in December it would stop subsidising the fares from April 30.

Funding would continue for half price fares for Community Services Card holders and Total Mobility users.

The move has forced the Bay of Plenty Regional Council, which delivers public transport, to look at its fare structure.

If the council continued with free youth fares, it would do so at its own cost and cause rates to rise.

The council’s Public Transport Committee discussed its options at a meeting on Wednesday.

The committee consists of six regional councillors and representatives from Tauranga City Council, Rotorua Lakes Council, Western Bay of Plenty District Council and Whakatāne District Council.

Public transport director Michael Seabourne said the council hadn’t budgeted for the NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi subsidy ending.

The committee was asked to choose between three options, including keeping the status quo.

The chosen option would then be presented to the regional council for approval because the decision had a financial impact the committee didn’t have the authority to sign off on it.

 

Buses are free for anyone aged 18 and under in in Tauranga, Whakatāne, and Rotorua. File photo/SunLive.

Option 1 retained free fares for anyone aged 18 and under, but 18 -24 year olds would pay full price.

Option 2 kept free fares for children five years and under, free fares during peak times for six to 18 year olds and made fares full price for 18-24 year olds.

Option two was the staff’s recommended option and “the more cautious approach”, said Seabourne.

The balance of the discounted fares is funded through targeted rates from Tauranga, Whakatāne, Rotorua and Western Bay.

The general rates would rise by $4.33 if status quo was retained, $4.02 under option 1 and $2.55 under option 2.

Tauranga’s targeted rate would rise by $28.52 for status quo, $26.73 for option 1 and $18.44 for option 2.

Rotorua’s targeted rate would rise by $8.70 for status quo, $7.90 for option 1 and $4.69 for option 2.

Whakatāne’s rate would rise by $1.42 under the status quo, $1.27 for option 1 and reduce by 3 cents under option 2.

For the Western Bay, the rate would rise by 35 cents with the status quo, option 1 would be 24c and decrease by 12c under option 2.  

Bay of Plenty Regional councillor Jane Nees wanted free fares to be retained for those aged 18 and under. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

Regional councillor Jane Nees said she preferred option one.

“I don't agree with us making this decision at this time when we have not done any consultation with the public on what this might mean to them.”

Committee chair Andrew von Dadelszen said the change had been brought about by the government in both providing the funding then taking it away, with the council not consulted.

He said the council didn’t have time for public consultation before the funding was removed.

“We will have to have a rigorous debate at our full council [meeting] because it has big implications for funding viability for our public transport budget.”

Western Bay mayor James said he was leaning towards option 1.

“Option 1 has merits, keeps things simple, [and] encourages children to use public transport.”

Councillor Ken Shirley said the council’s decision to have free fares was against staff recommendations at the time.

“On reflection it was clearly a bad and wrong decision, so I strongly endorse the recommended option 2."

The committee chose option 2 to recommend to full council after a tied vote, with  von Dadelszen using his casting vote to adopt option 2.

The recommendation will be presented to the regional council for a decision.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

You may also like....

9 comments

Hmmm

Posted on 13-03-2024 17:44 | By Let's get real

Don't blame the government...
Why are we so fixed on someone else paying for expenses that we should each own.
If using a bus is what you want to do, don't expect me to pay your fare. If you want to watch animals performing so you can bet on them, don't expect me to pay for the venue. If you choose to play golf, why should I be expected to subsidise your day.
The council was never established to pay for your lifestyle choices, The concept of "user pays" must be discussed openly and honestly well before any discussions about how many millions of ratepayers funds are available.
Councillors need to understand that NO is a perfectly acceptable response.


So much debate..........

Posted on 13-03-2024 21:07 | By groutby

.....and so many well paid bureaucrats needed to decide how to spend other people's money!..so...what to do?....cut the 'free stuff' and have no one on the buses or...continue to subsidise and have a few people who should be expected to be able to pay on them.....hmmmm...or, maybe use smaller 'shuttle style' vehicles and monitor the usage and vary the service accordingly...and perhaps more responsibly....


Poor Communication

Posted on 13-03-2024 22:38 | By The Truth Is Out There

Sadly going to be a big shamozzle, no matter which option is chosen.
With the BOPDC, not reiterating, or explaning the need!
Free fares if you have a registered Bee card.
Sadly no communications, by anyone!
Has lead the public to believe, free.
So, been going on for over a year.
Under 18's not paying. And they will continue to do so.
So the BOPRC, will still lose millions.
Due to they own negligence...


super gold

Posted on 14-03-2024 07:53 | By mandora

Just re the bus fares Will super gold card owners still not have pay for using the buses?


Just ONE point !

Posted on 14-03-2024 08:46 | By The Caveman

Nothing is FREE - someone is paying for FREELOADERS !!


empty bus...

Posted on 14-03-2024 11:01 | By OG-2024

One way to cut bus costs would be to stop all the empty buses that are driving around town with sign-age saying out of service/ hiring/ driver training and ACTUALLY use them to move passengers on more realistic public services instead of cutting services because no one uses the bus... we don't use it because they are all out joy riding around town empty!


There is a fine line between...

Posted on 14-03-2024 13:01 | By morepork

...supporting freeloaders and supporting some activities which you may not personally indulge in. 'Let's Get Real' takes a firmer view on this than I would, but I understand the point about "users should pay". The problem we have is that we simply don't have a large enough population to make some activities viable, unless there is support from the community chest. Certainly, life-style is a choice, but it is part of the general well being of our population. If we are to live together in communities we have to accept that some people will enjoy activities which we, personally, don't. I don't play Rugby any more, or cricket. Should I now protest some of my Rates going to support these activities? I don't take buses; should I protest my Rates subsidizing them? Living in a community is the choice most of us make. It has a cost...


Duh

Posted on 15-03-2024 07:00 | By drgoon

Why oh why do we persist with these big busses running empty or with minimal passengers? Surely smaller would be less costly and more environmentally friendly


@ Let's get real, groutby + drgoon

Posted on 15-03-2024 20:56 | By Yadick

Each of you make great comments. I TOTALLY agree with you. Well said.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.