Drivers behind rates rises across NZ laid bare

Photo: LGNZ.

Homeowners are facing average rates rises of 15% according to data in draft long-term plans across 48 councils, averaging at about $8 more per week* per household.

LGNZ commissioned a report by one of the country’s leading economists, Brad Olsen, which starkly illustrates the cost pressures councils are under. It also states that between 2002-2022, the average rates rise was only 5.7% per year, and rates rises averaged 9.8% in 2023.

“Councils are acutely aware they need to balance the need for investment with affordable increases but the pressure has reached tipping point,” says LGNZ’s Vice-President Mayor Campbell Barry.

Findings from the Infometrics report:

Over the past three years, costs have significantly gone up:

-Bridges are 38 per cent more expensive to build

-Sewage systems are 30 per cent more expensive to build

-Roads and water supply system are 27 per cent more expensive to build.

All councils are facing increasing costs for existing assets and services due to

-Inflation

-Cost of servicing debt

-Increasing insurance costs and audit costs.

“Councils' share of overall tax revenue has remained at two per cent of GDP for the last 50 years, despite our ever-increasing responsibilities,” says Mayor Campbell Barry.

“On top of the cost increases to existing assets and services, councils also face new pressures that require new spending.

“Many households pay $2-3,000 per year for just one service, such as power. It’s important to remember that rates account for a huge range of infrastructure and services communities rely on, including many that are invisible until something goes wrong.

“This includes meeting the demand for infrastructure in high-growth areas, coping with growth in tourism, adapting to climate change and increasing natural hazards, transitioning to a low carbon economy and dealing with emerging biosecurity threats.

“It’s no secret that the funding system for local government is broken. Rates account for more than half council funding, and relying so heavily on rates alone is unsustainable.

“We need a range of levers to address the funding and financing challenges in front of us, such as an accommodation levy, GST sharing on new builds, congestion charging and tourist levies.

“A 4-year term of local government would also double the productivity across councils and provide certainty which would create a longer-term pipeline of work for the private sector to partner with councils on,” Mayor Campbell Barry said.

You may also like....

9 comments

Councils need money?

Posted on 15-03-2024 13:40 | By morepork

Gosh! Who would've thought it? And yet, there is still much waste and lack of respect for Other People's Money (OPM), and a Commission that continues to table expensive, unwanted, vanity projects, when we have REAL necessities knocking at the door. "Roads and water supply system are 27 per cent more expensive to build." So we get roads that are "nice to look at" (but don't improve traffic flow) and we don't even look at a desal option to solve the water problem once and for all. The debt-laden rising generation will curse our myopia, stupidity, and inability to work smarter instead of "same old, same old", and we will deserve it.


Well

Posted on 15-03-2024 13:50 | By Kancho

No surprise then as commissioners spent up large on non essential nice to haves, consultants reports while core business infrastructure languished. So all the cheer leaders of council spending now will pay . Rents will also go up so no one escapes . So how about the stadium now ?


and it hasn't gone unnoticed....

Posted on 15-03-2024 15:53 | By groutby

....that many councils have just jumped on the 'we need even more money from you ratepayers' as a rest of the 3 waters garbage being scrapped despite a reasonably hefty unashamed 'sweetener' from the previous government...so where did that go?...
Cost out the basics that councils should do guys, and then we can see what $$ is left for 'nice' stuff...


Hmmm

Posted on 15-03-2024 16:49 | By Let's get real

It's no surprise to anyone that I'm disgusted by the wanton disregard for the value of other peoples' money that has been shown by council over the last few years.
Vanity projects and lavish expenditure on council employees.
Their work can be achieved to exactly the same standards in conservative office space in any other part of town.
I don't believe that anywhere enough thought has been put into the infrastructure needs of the city and the ever expanding boundaries into the future and we have just witnessed the fanciful dreams of a few, being set into motion by outsiders looking for a pat on the back from their next corporate meal tickets.
How long before we see some real/genuine concern for water reticulation, waste disposal, traffic movement and beautification before the wants of well paid council staff and the arts.


Hmmm

Posted on 15-03-2024 17:00 | By Let's get real

It's not about whether we need 4 year terms for councillors, they tend to carry the can for the deadwood in the background, who give them advice.
Let's see those behind the scenes owning up to their ineptitude at times and some admissions they they have got it wrong... But that won't result in anything other than more public expenditure (as Morepork says OPM)
If I mess up It's other peoples lives at risk and my future employment in the industry is forfeit, gone forever. And I take responsibility for that and accept the repercussions of my actions.
Working for council must be so very tough.


The Master

Posted on 15-03-2024 18:24 | By Ian Stevenson

With rampant spending, grossly costly dreams all being paid for by ratepayers without any reasonable limits...

Then as usual Councilors are running around desperate to find any means to bridge the gap. Hence endless rate increases that just can not be explained any day of the week.


The Master

Posted on 15-03-2024 18:25 | By Ian Stevenson

The resolution: -
1 Competent Councilors, and
2 Public "servants" not public enslavers.


Essential Services?

Posted on 16-03-2024 19:33 | By Floyd

Do we need a museum that will run at a loss every year into the future? Do we need skate parks that will never be user pays? Do we need extensive advertising telling us what a fantastic job the council are doing? Do we need so many council employees not involved in delivering essential services? Do we need 6 contractors employed by the council watching one actually doing productive work? What we need is every mention of the council being replaced with ratepayers so that no one forgets who is actually paying.


@ Let's Get Real

Posted on 17-03-2024 14:12 | By morepork

I re-read both of your "Hmmm" posts and I think it is very well expressed. We are suffering from an administration that has no answerability and is committed to the agenda of an expelled Government. They see OPM as their own resource, and they fortify their own CVs by projects that nobody can question. ("Look what I did for Tauranga..." at the next job interview...) The gravy train reaches the terminus in July. I really hope the next traindrivers will have learned from the current shambles. But, even if they are bad, at least they will be answerable and we can vote them out. Tauranga is too beautiful a place to be destroyed like this through vanity, ambition, and incompetence.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.