Historic crossing plea fails

Residents aiming to keep the historic walkway linking Ngatai Road and Seaway Terrace open were told the fight is over when they turned up to make their feelings known to Tauranga City Council's city vision committee today.

There will be no extension and no reprieve says zero harm manager for the Infrastructure and Asset Management division of KiwiRail, Peter Dix.


The ‘illegal' crossing that predates KiwiRail. Photo: File.

More than a dozen residents and supporters hoped to have their protests heard by councillors, but it turns out there's nothing the council can do to prevent the crossing being closed.

The flyer sent to residents on April 1 says the crossing could be closed from today.

According to Peter, the crossing is unsafe and bringing it up to standard will cost 'hundreds of thousands” of dollars because of the sightline safety requirements.

He says people coming down the steps have to be able to see a considerable distance along the track, which they cannot do unless considerable earthworks take place. He wasn't asked about an overbridge, or how much that would cost.

KiwiRail views it as an illegal crossing that has been there for a number of years

'We have been working with Tauranga City Council for a period of time now,” says Peter.

Kiwi Rail's attention was first brought to the crossing when it received complaints about the state of the wooden steps that give access (across KiwiRail land) down to the track.


Seaway Terrace resident Doreen Anderson. Photo: Bruce Barnard.

'It was not put there by us and we have no right or requirement to maintain it,” says Peter, 'so we don't.”

But it does place the crossing in the list of top ten issues for pedestrian crossings in New Zealand, and KiwiRail is closing it on safety grounds.

According to KiwiRail's survey of crossing users, they tend to be either school children, likely to be listening to headphones instead of listening for trains, or the elderly, who have to walk over track ballast instead of a properly formed pathway or pad.

When the residents mentioned no one has been hurt on that crossing since the railway went over the pathway in 1927, Peter says a boy killed on the track at Te Kuiti last year was the first person to be killed there.

Peter, however, had no answer to Doreen Anderson's complaint that they've had four working days to consider the path's closure, which the city council has known about since December, and didn't tell anyone until the joint announcement was made on April 1 – just four working days before the April 13 work commencement date.

She was given no explanation from councillors or staff and her plea to Peter for an extension of time was denied.

As for the tsunami escape route argument for keeping the crossing open, council staff say the city council's tsunami hazard map shows Seaway Terrace and Beach Road residents can escape the mapped tsunami danger without having to cross the rail tracks.


KiwiRail's Peter Dix
. Photo: Bruce Barnard.

9 comments

Saving people from themselves

Posted on 13-04-2015 19:19 | By BullShtAlert

This is a classic. Pleas for an extension and why weren't they consulted. The land is clearly owned by railways, not council. As for an extension, why? To allow more time for someone to trip, or walk into the path of a train? It's good to see a stop being put to this dangerous practice. Imagine the criticism if someone had been killed, the residents would be complaining that no-one had closed the path don't you think?


PC

Posted on 13-04-2015 22:58 | By Capt_Kaveman

madness, more kids are killed near schools and look at all the pc rubbish that never works,


to the person that complained

Posted on 14-04-2015 05:44 | By s83cruiser

to Kiwi Rail. Serves you right you should have kept your mouth shut and the crossing probably would have remained un noticed for years to come. Now you have lost it completely.


A Kiwirail copout.

Posted on 14-04-2015 11:39 | By The author of this comment has been removed.

This is a public walkway. Simple. It is kiwirail's responsibility to provide safe systems for the public alongside their tracks. No if's or but's. With this cop-out they will soon be saying that they are not responsible for safety alongside the Strand tracks. A simple barrier arm would suffice at this track. Shame on you Kiwirail !


one way only

Posted on 14-04-2015 14:56 | By festino lente

Kiwi Rail acts like they did hundreds of years ago, (worldwide) where it was a centralised body solely responsible for aiding economic growth. ie doing whatever it liked for the greater public good. This attitude remains and is prevalent in most kiwi rail discussions, be they between individuals and kiwi rail, businesses and kiwi rail, or public service and kiwirail


At the end of the day

Posted on 14-04-2015 17:01 | By Devils-advocate

It is private property and if the powers that be don't want people trespassing then that's their perogative. If the locals are that worried about it, then start fundraising for your own overpass. Just don't pay for it from my rates.


Private Property?

Posted on 14-04-2015 20:08 | By Murray.Guy

What's with this 'private property' argument? I thought KiwiRail was a 'public asset, bought and paid for a few times over by our taxes? Yes, put into a company just as Council's do to circumvent LGA consultation and transparency requirements, but public owned nevertheless. The complainant identity, I suspect that came from within the mouldy walls of TCC as Kiwirail were never cited as a reason for closure by TCC staff back in Sept 2013, just the poor condition of the walkway and an obscene cost to tidy it up. Just like children not getting there own way - come at it from another angle!


LONG TIME AGO

Posted on 14-04-2015 21:11 | By The Caveman

My info is that the walk way well and truly PRE-DATES the railway, thus it is probably well worth investigating VERY early land titles, and also talking to the Waitangi Tribunal !!! Somebody at some point ripped off the local land owners, especially as there are surveyed walkways both from the top and the bottom, that still exist. Thus the railway never did the total job. They just TOOK the land that has the land without the actual walkways. SOMEBODY - the locals got ripped off 80+ years ago under the so called Public Works Act. (take the bit we need and bugger the rest............


The railway was there before houses

Posted on 15-04-2015 10:13 | By Annalist

The arguments over whether a walkway existed before the rail are silly. If that was the case then a walkway probably existed over and through the houses that are now built there too. In that case do the public have the right to walk through people's houses? I'd say No and the same applies to the rail line. I still maintain that people walking over rail lines is plain stupid and an accident waiting to happen.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.