Bay Oval lease questioned

Questions are being raised about the summer lease that Tauranga City Council is about to sign with the Bay Oval Trust concerning Blake Park's cricket oval in Mount Maunganui.

Mount resident Rob Paterson presented his concerns to city councillors on Tuesday via objections to the proposal to lease the Blake Park venue to the Trust.


Blake Park's Bay Oval, which has a lease deal with Tauranga City Council via the Bay Oval Trust. Photo: File.

The Bay Oval Trust owns and manages the facility's pavilion and structures at the international cricket venue, but not the grounds – including the wicket and the outfield, which have not been specifically considered in any previous agreement.

After the World Cup qualifying tournament at Blake Park in 2014/15, council sought legal advice on how best to enable agreements between the Trust and third parties for use of the grounds.

A requirement of World Cup organisers was to demonstrate the facilties and grounds were under the control of the Trust, which could then sublease some of the controls to NZ Cricket and relevant partners.

A short-term, 40-day lease was agreed by council at the time, which has since expired.

Now, a summer lease from September 1 to April 30 for three years has been proposed as the best solution to fulfil venue requirements by organisations such as NZ Cricket.

New Zealand's Black Caps are scheduled to face Sri Lanka at the Mount venue next month, starting with a one-day international on January 5 followed by a Twenty-20 clash two days later.

Rob says the lease should have been made directly with NZ Cricket, not the Bay Oval Trust, which he claims is not actually a cricketing outfit.

'The Trust has, in my opinion, no transparency, no accountability, no viewable annual accounts or income and no viewable statement of financial positions,” says Rob.

'You can't see the records. They are not filed with the registrar, so unless council makes some provision in its lease, no-one knows how this is operating.

'You can't readily ascertain who the current trustees are, as they are not required to be lodged with the registrar.”

The Bay Oval Trust was first registered in August 2014, and was formerly the Bay of Plenty Cricket Trust which was established in June 2009.

'Council has to ensure that everything lines up and that it is squeaky clean,” says Rob.

'There's nothing wrong with a usual type of lease for cricket per se – a normal lease – but I don't think this is normal. It's got a little bit of the original Bay Park lease about it.

'It just looks like a sweetheart deal lease and it's unlike any other sporting lease that I have seen in this area.

'Council should be very wary of what's going on there, and what's going on with the outfit it is leasing to.”

However, speaking after the meeting, Bay Oval Trust general manager Kelvin Jones says much of what Rob says is incorrect.

'We are a registered charity," confirms Kelvin. "As such, our annual accounts go online in the charities register and all trustees are updated on that register as well as on our website.

'We absolutely comply. We audit our accounts to comply with the charity commission's requirement.”

The Bay Oval Trust is 'absolutely” a cricket organisation, says Kelvin, with some obvious objectives which the charities commission accepted.

'We were formerly Bay of Plenty Cricket Trust - that bit is correct,” he says

The wicket and outfield are subject to a memorandum of understanding that the Trust has had with council for four or five years on how the cricket ground and wicket are used, says Kelvin.

'The lease has to be with a local entity,” he says. Only two games at the venue last season were run by New Zealand Cricket.

'The rest of them were either Northern Districts or, in the case of the World Cup, ICC, or district level cricket. There are a number of levels here.”

Mayor Stuart Crosby says a report will be prepared for councillors addressing the concerns. The bay oval lease is an agenda item for today's annual plan meeting.

7 comments

How many days to go....

Posted on 16-12-2015 12:06 | By sambo's back

before 2 x International cricket fixtures are played, the opportunity to earn a "little coin", but no,wait,yes, nah!!!!lets make it hard, and not have all the correct criteria signed off, while all will get done i am sure, someones managerial skills are in question.


Transparent?

Posted on 16-12-2015 14:23 | By Crash test dummies

Why can these not be found online, they are no where to be seen. The after meeting comments are just simply window dressing to try and get the opaque screen back up again. Business as usual, there needs to be full and complete disclosure ehre.


Association

Posted on 16-12-2015 14:49 | By Gigilo

It is not what you know but who you know, my bad that is a Trust, how silly of me.


complaints

Posted on 16-12-2015 15:08 | By rotovend

this man complains about everything including Baypark its become apparent that he possibly needs to get a hobby other than complaining


Hmmmm

Posted on 17-12-2015 00:36 | By How about this view!

I guess ratepayers are funding the maintenance, mowing and upkeep of the ground and embankments to an exacting standard and at greater cost than at other sports venues during most of the year and OTHERS gain an income from our largess?


Tauranga knockers

Posted on 17-12-2015 13:02 | By Kaimai

Appears that the Trustees are respectable people to me, and the aduitors are certainly well qualified - perhaps those that make the the comments about disclsoure should be subject to the same scrutiny - come on JAFFA and RP,a little bit of seaching and the answers would be found - if you can't find them ... says more about you then it does about the Bay Oval Trust and TCC.


@ Kaimai

Posted on 18-12-2015 16:39 | By Crash test dummies

Respectable? come on mate, if the means to fund their hobbies is to dip into ratepayers pockets then maybe that is not so respectable. The auditors ... Audit NZ are meant to be respectable to, but try convincing the average Kaipara ratepayer of that, there rates doubled in a year and Audit NZ are still bewildered by it all. Linking nice words does not make it better, in fact merely clouds the mess from the public of what they are really doing and who gets the coin.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.