TECT and Trustpower trade barbs

Trustpower chief executive Vince Hawksworth, left, and TECT chair Bill Holland have differing views on how the consultation process in relation to the current TECT proposal has been handled.

TECT and Trustpower have each accused the other of causing ‘confusion and concern' among consumers, as the deadline for submissions on the TECT proposal looms.

Submissions on the proposal by TECT trustees to transform the organisation into a solely charitable trust must be made by 4pm Thursday March 1.

Trustpower chief executive Vince Hawskworth says Trustpower customers are ‘suspicious' TECT is ‘deliberately withholding information over its controversial proposal'.

He says Trustpower has been inundated with thousands of public queries about TECT's proposal, and that the confusion and concern customers are expressing are of TECT's own making.

'We think it's time the trustees pulled the plug on this and reconsidered the whole process and proposal, perhaps starting with: do Trustpower customers actually want change?”

TECT seem to be unaware of the extent of public confusion and suspicion about the trustees' intentions and motives, he says.

'TECT aren't telling people the real reasons for this irreversible change or what's going to happen after. People are worried because there are so many unanswered questions.”

Trustpower alleges TECT has not informed the public about when verbal submissions on the proposal can be heard or when and where.

'People don't know when TECT will publish a final proposal and when voting will be held. There is no clarity around the independence and integrity of the vote process, nor whether the votes will be postal or electronic,” says Vince.

'This is basic information that – only days out from the final deadline for submissions – we still don't know,” he says. 'On the current trajectory it appears TECT wants to hold the vote over Easter and the school holidays, which would reduce the number of people voting.

'We've heard from people who say they ticked the wrong box because the form was unclear and others who would have ticked a different box if they knew then what they know now.

'Surely TECT wants every affected person to have a say on what happens to their money, given TECT holds Trustpower shares on our customers' behalf,” says Vince. 'This is too important a decision for people to be denied the relevant information about what happens with their assets.”

In response, TECT has issued a statement saying they are ‘becoming increasingly alarmed at attempts by Trustpower to muddy the waters for consumers in the current public consultation process'.

'We are worried Trustpower's well-financed campaign is having an effect on the integrity of the consultation process,” says TECT chair Bill Holland.

He says Trustpower's ‘subversive campaign' against the TECT proposal includes critical advertising in the media, holding its own rival public meetings, sending out ‘scaremongering media releases', legal threats and seeking public submissions on several contradictory proposals at the same time TECT is undertaking its consultations on the formal proposal.'

'These moves by Trustpower are causing confusion and concern among consumers,” says Bill.

'Trustpower is spreading unfounded fear around the proposal. For instance, the suggestion that the trust be wound up so consumers can get a final pay-out of $15,000. Trustees could never agree to that concept because it makes no provision at all for future consumers.

'It is mischievous for Trustpower to suggest it as a valid option.”

He says the trustees have always had the interests of all consumers at heart.

'We need to look after not only the consumer of today but also the consumer of tomorrow.”

He says the trustees believe TECT was established to provide for the current and future generations of Tauranga.

'If we accept that change in the industry is inevitable, we must also accept that there are no guarantees that the current way we operate will be sustainable forever.

'Of course we want Trustpower to be successful. The current proposal allows for another five years of cheques which gives Trustpower time to reposition their marking strategies to ensure they retain market share and remain competitive in the Tauranga market.

'Their diversified earnings base will help them do this, as the vast majority of their profit comes from their generation business and the rest of the country makes up the largest percentage of their retail customer base.

'That said, the TECT cheque was never designed to distort pricing in a competitive electricity market. Much of the feedback we have received already makes the point that the value of the cheque consumers receive does not justify the higher electricity prices people pay to Trustpower.”

Bill says TECT has received more than 10,000 submissions to date from consumers and the volume of material means it will take time for the trust to review the results.

'Verbal submissions will be heard at times and places that will be determined when the trustees know how many people want to be heard and where they live,” he says.

'I can assure consumers that the Trustees have the best interests of the consumers, both current and future, in mind and their goal in the consultation is to find a solution that is fair and provides the greatest certainty for current and future generations.”

You may also like....

9 comments

Not believed

Posted on 27-02-2018 08:17 | By Maryfaith

Sorry Bill - I for one do not believe you! Your actions and confused questions aim to get the reply TECT is seeking


Trustpower

Posted on 27-02-2018 08:30 | By waiknot

Is running scared as they are the only true if unintended beneficiaries of the current scheme.


TECT

Posted on 27-02-2018 09:09 | By tish

is intending to abandon the benefits to the people who own the right to the investment income. Leave it as it is, it's shareholder owned funds, not open season charity finding. Leave our share alone.


Something doesn't add up

Posted on 27-02-2018 09:46 | By PennyP

Interesting how Bill Holland says ' the suggestion that the trust be wound up so consumers can get a final pay-out of $15,000. Trustees could never agree to that concept because it makes no provision at all for future consumers' an interesting statement given he is proposing to remove a dividend from all future consumers that are entitled to it for the next 55 years! He wants to protect them now because if he pays out what the customers are actually entitled to, he won't be able to do what HE wants to do. He also made the comment that Trustpower were holding their own 'rival meetings' HOWEVER, TECT trustees were invited to ALL of these meetings and chose NOT to turn up. I guess it's harder to lie to the community when you have to do it face-to-face.


They are

Posted on 27-02-2018 10:54 | By Capt_Kaveman

devious thieves and nothing more, id rather go off grid than use them


Bottom line.

Posted on 27-02-2018 12:50 | By morepork

The people who the Trust is supposed to benefit (Trustpower subscribers) are being shafted by the current proposal. They have been offered far less than their contribution is worth and for TECT to become 100% Community charitable (while it is a worthwhile aim) does not protect their interests, or comply with the wording of the Trust Deed. Throughout the Deed the phrase: "...benefit of Consumers" is repeated many times and in Section 5.3d it is clearly stated that any contribution to the Community must benefit the Consumers. The current proposal is not offering fair value to consumers and for that reason alone it should be rejected.


I believe all current TECT Trustees should resign

Posted on 27-02-2018 13:54 | By SML

as they clearly are not acting in the way Trustees are supposed to act - in the interests of the beneficiaries, who are the Trustpower CONSUMERS of the old TEPB supply area. Not consumers of any other powerco/telco, but Trustpower consumers. Not all in the Tauranga/BOP area, but Trustpower consumers.An attempted bribe - at far less than than the current worth of that Trustpower consumer shareholding - is reason enough for a legal challenge to the actions of Trustees - especially the new Leader of the Opposition's wife, who campaigned on KEEPING the TECT cheque, and I for one, feel cheated by this apparent deception (from campaign trail statement to current position)


take a closer look

Posted on 27-02-2018 14:58 | By Petrolhead

NZ power companies are in for a shake up, oversupply, lower prices = less profit. Trustees seem to be flagging this will impact long term viability of TECT chq. Lots of comments from TECT customers saying they pay more premium than they get back, that tells me its not a financial decision to belong to TPWR, its a social one - you know money is leaving your pocket to fund community needs. TPWR seem to be rorting the consumer, charging more to cover the TECT chq payout - shame on them, no wonder they are fueling the fire of confusion. So proposal seems to be, guess what, profits will drop as will your TECT chq, removing this will put pressure on TPWR to cough up decent power rates or risk looking customers, your social funding still goes to the community as before. Smooth the transition with a 5yr guarantee?


Glad it's not just me

Posted on 27-02-2018 16:32 | By backofthequeue

Who else has noticed that two of our newest trustees who are less than half way through their first term were elected on a campaign of "safeguarding" (Natalie Bridges) and "protecting" (Amanda Sutcliffe) the TECT cheque distribution. That they should now support a proposal to cease the cheque is such a breach of trust that their continued positions must surely be regarded as untenable.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.