Anxious watch over doomed ship

Tonight is a big night for Rena. Stranded on a reef, her hulk wracking and ripping from the third storm in as many weeks.
The people of the Bay are watching like nervous parents, seeing their wayward daughter about to end a rocky relationship with a troublesome boy.

Opinion piece by Sun Media director/editor Brian Rogers

Tonight is a big night for Rena. Stranded on a reef, her hulk wracking and ripping from the third storm in as many weeks.

The people of the Bay are watching like nervous parents, seeing their wayward daughter about to end a rocky relationship with a troublesome boy.

The salvors have done an amazing job so far (amidst the comments of thousands of armchair experts like me) getting a thousand tonnes of the oily toxic gunk pumped out. But as the storm pummels Rena, the chances of getting that last several hundreds tonnes out is unknown.

One of two things will happen to Rena tonight, Tuesday. Either she will weather the storm swell and remain broken but intact on Astrolabe Reef; or she will break up.

If she breaks up, the front half is likely, according to Maritime NZ, to stay stuck hard on the reef. The stern half is likely to break clear and either float or sink.

Early in the saga, salvors talked about the chances of pushing the aft half back onto shallower waters of Astrolabe to make salvage easier.

Now they are saying that if the aft portion floats long enough, they would prefer the massive tug Go Canopus, which is tethered to the aft of Rena, to tow the portion to shallower water.

But the big story that has been overlooked is: Where are the preferred options?

This information has not been forthcoming from MNZ and our reporters at the daily news conferences say that much of the short time available to ask such pertinent questions has been sucked up by dumb questions. TVNZ has been a prime candidate in the dumb question department. One wonders if MNZ is quietly happy that valuable question time is being wasted on dumb questions, leaving the rest of the media, with sensible questions, to go unanswered.

Well that is really quite immaterial tonight, especially if Rena lets go and purges a thousand or so containers into the ocean.

The news tomorrow will be dominated by the drama of hundreds of steel boxes sinking, floating, washing ashore and causing general nautical mayhem.

However, back to the tow site options. This is a burning question in my mind and has probably not been considered by most of Joe Public. If the aft portion, assuming it floats, is not shoved onto the nearby shallows of Astrolabe, and floats long enough to be towed elsewhere, then the candidates must be Papamoa Beach, Matakana Island, or Motiti Island.

Wherever you park the broken remains of half a ship is not going to be a popular concept with the locals.

The Motiti folk have had more than enough battering and oiling from Rena and the rocky shoreline means it's probably the worst place to deliberately take half a shipwreck.

Matakana has been touted as the "ideal" place, by some sources within the local maritime industry. They say that the mess would be extreme, but for a short time in a confined area. And if the last 358 tonnes of oil breaks out, the sand would be easier to clean up than if it was unleashed on a rocky shoreline such as Motiti. The isolation of Matakana also provides a modicum of natural geographical crowd control, which might suit the officials.

But our sources within the industry have fingered Papamoa as the preferred destination for Rena's wayward chuff.

Assuming that the wrecked bits float long enough to be taken anywhere, a hulk beached in the shallows would then be cut up and removed over a period of months or years, depending on weather and access. An interesting scenario for the hundreds of multi million dollar residences along the beautiful coast.

Not a nice prospect for any part of our coastline.

However it is interesting that MNZ has kept mum about any of its plans for the aft section, should it break free and float.

One of our sources in the salvage team says the most likely time is between 8 and midnight tonight. He hasn't been wrong yet with any of his other predictions.

It will be an interesting night. Potentially a very sad night.

12 comments

The Republic of Liberia

Posted on 01-11-2011 19:31 | By Openknee8ted

But tell the polititions there is photo opportunity on board first. Invite TVNZ and the will be able to ask all the dumb questions and film all the dumb answers on the way.


rena

Posted on 01-11-2011 20:21 | By chrisminers

Thank you Its good to read an article that is written by someone that knows what they are writing about. Good reporting


My two cents worth

Posted on 01-11-2011 20:32 | By T Parker

It is interesting that the news media sing the song of praise for the salvor. Let's face it the salvor has a contract with the insurer and will be paid a commission on the value of assets recovered. Of little interest to them is the impact to our environment. Earlier on I asked the question as to why they had not considered the option to run the engines on load for the five days before the first storm which could have consumed 1200 tonnes of fuel. Sun Live put the question to the them and their answer was that the opportunity had been lost. A more truthful answer would have been that the fuel was too valuable to burn off. The option to beach the aft section in shallow water off Papamoa or Matakana is most likely cost driven as it is considerably less costly to recover salvable items in shallow water. Money in the bank,important. Caring for the environment,who cares!


Sad end

Posted on 01-11-2011 21:09 | By Mr H

We all know that a metal ship cant talk nor feel but the spirt that surrounds a man made object that service it meaning to performs a task that it was build to serve an organization to be lost on bad judgment.with the elements of forces of mother nature against her fate


25 DAYS LATE

Posted on 01-11-2011 22:32 | By ANNA KISSED

Sadly this result is the end result that was obvious on day one, what has not been obvious at that time (but is blatantly obvious since) is that the mess in the management of this disaster. Weeks went by and there were 9 max on the ship at times and 200+ officials lurking in an ex supermarket building in Cameron Road. It is obvious that the daily reporting of events was far more onto it that actually dealing with the events themselves which should have been the important part being the ship itself. Sure all and sundry want to know what is happening every minute, but that was a distant second in my book. Good report, facts at last on the table and amazingly before the event.


I

Posted on 01-11-2011 22:38 | By Capt_Kaveman

dont care if they call us armchair experts but i think they are a bunch of tossers why not more pumps more barges floaties wrapped around it to keep it afloat sounds like these guys have done lots of paperwork but never hands on in thought its a sad case when you look at it money is the key to it all i still ask why port of Tga dont forkout some funds its their bussness that has caused it


Just Nuke It

Posted on 02-11-2011 05:49 | By jimmi

I made a tonque firmly in cheek suggestion 4 weeks ago today, that napalm was the answer, think of all the man hours saved, the oil would have burnt off, and what steel was left, could have been gathered from the sea bed. no worries, back to the dithering by the powers that be, also maybe the French could be hired, I seem to remember they are good at blowing things up, and they may need some scrap metal, to make a cup.


In case of emergency break glass.

Posted on 02-11-2011 07:50 | By bigted

An average of 5 ships a year worldwide come to be in this parlous state. Why are there not onboard each vessel emergency systems, ie emergency power supplies, pumps, drainage systems to cater for these situations? We on land are forced to put in alarms, sprinklers, water/overflow pumping pipes, overflows, power backups, etc, but they are not? The Port of Tauranga/industry should be asking for better emergency management systems from providors to protect us and our environment. 200 + people on land staring at computer screens doing what? (I'm in charge of the coffee supply.) Beyond belief!


if they

Posted on 02-11-2011 09:31 | By Capt_Kaveman

think pushing it a shore at the papamoa beach, i will set fire to it and are willing to stand trail for it


GO JIMMI

Posted on 02-11-2011 11:23 | By ANNA KISSED

I think that they could have even done that to, ages ago would have saved all the mess on the beaches and everywhere. Is it not the truth to say that "if you knew the consequence and did nothing to prevent it then that is at least 'bird' slaughter and more?" If the options are A. Burn it or B. it is all going in the sea then who knows where after that + consequences all over the place? Which one would you choose, simple really and millions saved, avoid huge impact on the environment, a carton of C4 would do it, END OF PROBLEM!


ANNA KISSED

Posted on 02-11-2011 16:30 | By jimmi

yep, I am pretty psssst off about this intire debacle, and over it!!!! The problem being economically, all in the region will suffer, (if they are not already), and indirectly it will be us that pays. I have seen a few shoddy management systems before, but Maritme NZ, you not only take the cake, but the whole bakery. Lets clean it up, now that it has happened, and move on, but be rest assured MNZ we will be doing all we can to hold you accountable for the damage that has been done, and fingers crossed, things get sorted quickly, so it does not get any worse,


update

Posted on 02-11-2011 23:36 | By Capt_Kaveman

on my outburst if it breaks and they try to move it to papamoa beach i hear there is enough people to meet it with protest in large numbers if they cant do it toe it out past the contentental shelf and shink it


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.