Car smoking fines a punitive waste of time

File image/SunLive.

A public health academic has told the Health Select Committee plans to fine parents for smoking in a car with children will be a waste of time and won’t protect children.

The committee heard submissions this morning on the Smoke-free Environments Amendment Bill, which proposes to fine people $50 if they are caught smoking with passengers under 18 years of age.

Researcher Marewa Glover heads the Centre of Research Excellence: Indigenous Sovereignty and Smoking and has studied smoking and its effects for 25 years. She told the committee the bill would not change a thing.

“If you don’t want people smoking around children please put the money, time and effort into effective interventions to help those parents quit. This proposal, this law, is a waste of time.”

Dr Glover says fining adults for smoking in cars with children would be counter-productive and negatively impact Maori women – of which 38 per cent smoked.

She also says the impacts of second-hand smoke had been greatly exaggerated and that if children were in cars with smokers, with would not have a long-term effect on them and their bodies would heal from any short-term impacts.

Committee member Liz Craig says on that point she would have to disagree with Dr Glover, while another member Matt Doocey says the claim was ‘outrageous.’

Dr Glover confirmed the main point of her submission was that education and support for smokers was where government efforts should be focused.

The Bill proposes to have an 18-month campaign lead in to educate people about the new rules in the hope that when it kicked in, the actual number of people being fined would be minimal.

But Dr Glover says police should not be involved in this and should not have anything to do with regulating a public health issue.

“The assumption there is that there’ll be a campaign and the police will pull people over and they’ll give cessation advice. But it’s not a therapeutic relationship… if the police pull you over, for many people it’s a very stressful situation. So they’re not the right messenger.

“We need to make sure that these services are working with these vulnerable families who are not necessarily going to quit just because there’s a campaign or because the police pull them over.”

Public Health Association of New Zealand chief executive Prudence Stone says Dr Glover’s submission was ‘strange’ and questioned her motives.

“What a strange precedent that has been set this morning by the previous submitter. I would advise you from here on to clarify with every submitter whether or not they are receiving tobacco industry funding for their hearing scripts today and for their submissions written towards this legislation.”

Prudence says the association supported the planned legislation.

“For children, the measure de-normalises smoking. It disrupts what they might have grown up thinking was normal. It enables their rights to protest from the back seat, and it enables law enforcers to intervene on their behalf if their own voice is disabled, too small, or just simply ignored.”

She says the association wanted the legislation to include vaping as well, because the long-term effects of it were still unknown.

“It’s not about turning children into a science experiment one generation at a time and while the evidence is out this government would be wise to take a precautionary approach.”

The only point that the association agreed with Dr Glover on was that a harsh punitive approach was unlikely to be helpful.

The Cancer Society also threw its support behind the changes, saying quite simply – a child in a car with a smoker, is not a good thing.

It also confirmed it did not receive any funding from the tobacco industry.


You may also like...


Don't be Mad at Mad!...

Posted on 22-08-2019 20:35 | By groutby

...I have the answer!....if you are caring enough to think you may become addicted to nicotine and assist in providing your offspring (and others) when smoking in your car...then...DON’T START!...there ya go..wayy to easy don’t you think?


Posted on 22-08-2019 14:14 | By morepork

I agree with your position and I don’t think harsh penalties are the answer, but then, the report also said that. The real problem here, for me, is what to believe when an "expert" contradicts what plain common sense would indicate. Smoking’s bad for you, second hand smoke is bad for you and the jury is still out on vaping. But Dr. Glover believes otherwise. I think we need more thorough investigation, clear disconnect from vested interests (like the tobacco industry), and more than one "expert" opinion. In the meantime, err on the side of caution.

Mad at mad

Posted on 22-08-2019 08:53 | By Kefe

People who smoke are suffering from an addiction to nicotine. To penalize those people (as the previous poster believes) to $500 they lose the ability to provide for families. Smoking costs a crazy amount due to tax (which studies have shown have not worked) and is already a struggle for those suffering from nicotine addiction buying cigarettes. I believe in education for people to reduce/quit smoking not increasing fines but providing support and incentives.


Posted on 21-08-2019 20:22 | By Honesty is the best Policy

Wow really $50 what a joke nz is too SOFT and you think people will stop dont thing so not if they only pay $50 sould be 500 then people will think twice our goverment is way to SOFT HARDEN UP

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to make a comment. Login Now