Some Bay of Plenty leaders still don't agree on the best way for Tauranga to move forward, just weeks ahead of the government appointing commissioners to the city's council.
Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta is considering a list of potential commissioners to take over governing at Tauranga City Council.
The move followed a string of problems at the council, including bitter infighting among councillors and governance issues.
Western Bay of Plenty District Mayor Garry Webber supports the move.
He says successive Tauranga City councils over the past decade had let the region down by failing to make the hard calls - namely increasing rates to fund growth - and this had affected the development of the whole region.
Western Bay and Tauranga City councils were part of a group called Smart Growth, which was designed to facilitate regional collaboration on housing, infrastructure and roading in the fast growing area.
But Webber says that has bought 20 years of planning with little action due to a lack of funding, partly due to insufficient rates revenue.
"The implementation has been diabolical disaster. Everyone knows what needs to be to be done, but it comes back to some people saying we can't afford to put the rates up. If we can't afford to put the rates up, we can't afford to spend the money."
He believes the Tauranga City Council shied away from rates increases due to affordability concerns and to avoid riling up residents during the last decade or so.
Western Bay residents with a property worth $500,000 pay about $800 more in rates per annum than their Tauranga City counterparts.
Webber says if Western Bay residents can afford higher rates, so can those in Tauranga City Council.
He hoped commissioners will get stuck in and do the dirty work for the region's long-term benefit.
It is crucial for the Port of Tauranga and the wider Bay of Plenty economy that Tauranga's roading system was well-planned and funded, he says.
"There's a lot of export [products] that come out of the Eastern Bay of Plenty. All of the forestry in the back country all has to funnel through the Port of Tauranga.
"I'm confident the commissioners put in will have the skill set to make it happen."
But Tauranga City councillor Kelvin Clout - who is against the appointing of commissioners – believes the government's intervention was unnecessary.
He admitted that public backlash was one of the reasons rates had not been put up, and believed residents were split between those who wanted to see the city grow and were willing to pay for it, and those who were not.
"That sort of dichotomy has gone through to the council as well. I think it's fair to say over the last 10 plus years, there has been a reluctance from some councillors to put the rates up knowing the rates knowing the back lash they're going to get from their constituents."
Clout says the current council was looking to change that by putting forward a rates increase of up to 20 percent in its draft long-term plan.
He believes replacing the council with commissioners would compromise democracy in the region and he said the council could still work together.
"There's always been a majority of councillors who are prepared together collaboratively, and that is still the case."
Local Government New Zealand president Stuart Crosby says the organisation had learned that it was better to intervene and offer councillors support sooner rather than later.
The commissioners are expected to be announced on February 4 and take over on February 8.
7 comments
Tom Ranger
Posted on 18-01-2021 16:24 | By Tom Ranger
Garry Webber. The real issue we have as rate-payers is we are daily witnesses to the wasted money we give them already!!!!!!!!!! We have 0 faith in them to use the money wisely! If their projects ran smoothly we would have less to object to. But they have given us ALL the reasons we need to be 1) Upset and 2) Resistant towards increasing rates. Show me efficiency! Show me wise use of money! Show me where money was saved! Show me projects that work! Show me roading layouts that operate properly and cater to the majority of transport(cars Not busses) Show me projects they don't need to remediate afterwards!....two or three times over! Then!!!!...maybe!!!! We can look at increasing rates by a fraction of the 20%. If councilors were aware of the financial strife they were in...why did they approve salary increases within the first months of forming.
Commissioner
Posted on 18-01-2021 16:58 | By Kancho
I really don't care who is running council. I do care that squabbling at council instead of fiscal governance and proper running stopped. It's clear that infrastructure planning and investment has not been done or kept up with growth. People will always object to paying so the debt has got worse and planning has been poor and Investment too little. I do care about half cocked planning and the waste of money . Many examples that annoy me. Tenby told us but the message was lost we would be insolvent if we were in business. So if the commissioner can bring some government investment and rates go up too so be it . Complaining about the poor performance of council won't achieve anything. Everything costs more as anyone knows so you want stuff fixing it costs.
Time for change
Posted on 18-01-2021 17:20 | By Womby
The last elected bunch behaved poorly, embarrassing for the city in fact. The new commissioners surely cannot do worse, and hopefully they will have a better understanding of what is required to govern if that is the term. Mr Crosby, who was mayor for a long time recently has not commented on the Wbopdc mayors statement that previous councils were lax in not attending to the rates to further fund progress in the area. Although I have been a tauranga resident all my life I am just in the Wbopdc area. The many years I have been here give me the knowledge that my services eg rubbish, weed spraying etc have deteriorated as years have passed. Same with the main roads, Mr Bridges was transport minister and never sorted tauranga to katikati highway out but is slating the new government. I think the commissioners will work.
Necessities!
Posted on 18-01-2021 17:36 | By Equality
If successive councils had stuck to improving intrastructure and other priorities instead of continually spending wastefully on 'nice to haves,' then we would have had good infrastructure and money left over for a few 'nice to haves'. There would be no reason to raise rates! Lets hope the commissioner is of similar mind!
Not much........
Posted on 18-01-2021 21:44 | By groutby
.....of a 'cross section' of 'leaders' in the article I would have thought.....Clout/Webber/Crosby...is that it?
But . . .
Posted on 19-01-2021 09:24 | By Yadick
Clout always has a 'but' to add and so the division continues. Get rid the lot of them and start again. Tenby had the right ideas and direction but perhaps went about it the wrong way due to the divided, appalling, self agendered others. You can only pull in every direction for so long before everything drips and falls completely apart. Now it's time to rebuild which in the demolition stage of the process could get messy and will need the inevitable rates rise. Onwards and upwards.
I agree...
Posted on 19-01-2021 15:32 | By morepork
... with the points raised by all the posters here so far. BEFORE there can be any talk of Rates increase, there HAS TO BE talk of admin savings, efficiency increase, transparency, answerability, and NO SUGGESTION of wage increases for TCC Councillors or staff until there is a performance increase to justify it.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.