Fair Go investigates failed wall

A Tauranga couple will appear on Fair Go this week to air their grievances about a $370,000 failed retaining wall that is forcing them to sell up and move on.

Barry and Raewynne Elshaw, who live in 4th Avenue, are looking to sell their house after a year-long saga to fix a specially engineered retaining wall that collapsed on their property.


Tauranga residents Raewynne and Barry Elshaw outside their failed retaining wall in 4th Ave.

'We'll sell up, move out,” says Barry.

'It's a nice area close to town. It's got so much going for it, but I just don't enjoy living there.”

Barry says contractor Heath Breen was employed to construct a retaining wall a year ago and when it collapsed admitted fault before leaving town.

His insurance company stepped in but Barry says nothing has happened in the year since, leaving the Elshaws with a hefty bill.

'We were trying to get plans drawn to reinstate the wall. During that time he (the contractor) went to a solicitor, who said ‘don't admit liability', but it was too late he had already done that.

'From that time on I've tried very, very hard to have a conversation with him. We have heard nothing. All in all it's been a very stressful 12 months.

'My wife has been as solid as a rock right the way through this. The last 12 months have been the worst 12 months in our lives.”

Barry says the contractor has been tracked down by Fair Go and is now believed to be living in Ngaruawahia.

Barry and Raewynne now face the prospect of taking the contractor to court, a process that is estimated to cost $25,000 a day for a 7-10 day hearing, with no guarantee of success and a three to five year wait for the outcome.

This Barry says they cannot afford.

It all started a few years back when the Elshaws were looking at the prospect of subdividing and moving onto the lower part of their property.

Tauranga City Council approved the plans on the condition a properly engineer-designed retaining wall separated the two properties.

Heath Breen of Heath's Retaining and Fencing Ltd offered to quote for the work. At the time he was a volunteer at the Tauranga Volunteer Coastguard where Barry is a long term administrator.

He got the job, which according to the council approved design required two walls stepped down the hill and separated by a bench.

Barry says the top wall was built and completed but then the contractor went away for five or six weeks before starting on the bottom wall.

By the time he returned to start on the bottom wall Barry says the top wall had collapsed. That was 12 months ago today, says Barry.

'He admitted that he had done wrong. He admitted that not just in front of us but in front of other engineers.

'At our age we don't need a bill for $370,000.”

Barry and Raewynne are both volunteers at Tauranga Volunteer Coastguard, Raewynne also works at the Red Cross Shop, and on Wednesdays Barry and Raewynne also help Tauranga Meals On Wheels.

Fair Go is on TV1 on Wednesday evening.

In a statement to SunLive Heath Breen says he never saw the original engineers drawings until after the wall moved.

When the incident happened, he went to help assuming his public liability insurance would cover if it was his problem.

"The Elshaws never put in a claim," says Heath. "Why didn't they do that? If they had then the insurance companies would have sorted it."

The Elshaws were developers, says Heath. If the Elshaws had provided the full and orginal plans then the cost of the project would have been considerably more.

Most developers understand that with any development there is an element of risk, but at no time did the Elshaws try to minimise it by getting their own insurance cover.

"The contractors always gets slammed," says Heath.

"After this happened, I stopped work in Tauranga, I had to move to Ngaruawahia to work in the freezing works where I spent 12 weeks on strike."

His home is for sale and his relationship of six years ended. He's out of pocket by $100,000 plus, and if the insurance company doesn't pay then he will be forced into bankruptcy.

"And what about the engineer that I hired. He was bankrupt at the time and he walks off scot-free."

9 comments

WHAT A MESS

Posted on 16-07-2012 13:39 | By TERMITE

A year ago, that means last winter, the weather was a shocker and some, guess that played a big factor in it to. Got a mess, have to put it right, the bill will be a lot more than the first time around and some.


A HOUSE COMING TO A PLCE NEAR YOU?

Posted on 16-07-2012 14:34 | By TERMITE

Looks rather a big mess here, guess the losses will go as far as the section below is no longer saleable now also. The mess needs to be fixed properly or the house above is going to move to the spot below some day soom. The losses are adding up all around, so selling the section will mean that the insuurance will have to pay for the loss there to.


Sound foundation is the basis of everything in life

Posted on 16-07-2012 14:36 | By MINDER

Wasn't Mr Elshaw a Real Estate Agent before retiring and did he check the whole subdivision project works out properly before proceeding ?- surely he did so ?


I said so

Posted on 16-07-2012 14:58 | By I Said So

Surley the Council has full responsibility for ensuring that this wall awas completed to their requirments. What is the point of them requiring then approving the design and then it is not completed to their requirements.. Get the involved and make them see to the completition of the work


our wall

Posted on 16-07-2012 17:05 | By [email protected]

sorry Heath done a awesome job on our wall and our deck, i would reccomend him to anyone, i feel sorry for the ppl to whoms wall has failed and dont think it should come to this heath if u read this sort it out for them ur a desent man


Shakespeare says

Posted on 16-07-2012 17:22 | By jackb

$25,000 a day for a court action??? If true, then its time the whole system(sic) of justice was purged of this nonsense.


to

Posted on 17-07-2012 09:36 | By Phailed

You can't be sure from the story so far but it seems the wall project wasn't completed, so how could it be inspected and ticked off? Feel free to put you own money into solving this scrap between a developer and a contractor, but don't suggest my hard earned rates that I pay to Council be somehow involved.


I am with you Phailed

Posted on 17-07-2012 16:57 | By Butch

dead bloody right, why should the ratepayers cough up!!!!!, the fight is with the developer, and contractor.


HAD A LOOK YESTERDAY

Posted on 21-07-2012 17:30 | By YOGI

There were some workmen there when i arrived, looked like they were a bit shy about being there, don't know who they were but what a mess it is. My small understanding of engineering leads me to think that the whole job is a mess, the lower wall should have been built first to protect the house below, then tackle the upper house retaining all as shown in the photo above. End result ... I hate to see the bill to fix this one, it is going to be really bad!


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.