Transpower could be forced back to the drawing board regarding the contentious issue of powerlines over Maungatapu Marae after a Court ruling denied an appeal application.
The company were seeking to appeal a High Court ruling from May, which had overturned a previous Environment Court's decision to grant consents on plans to replace the lines.
But the Court of Appeal denied Transpower's latest application on Friday, with Justice Stephen Kós and Justice Mark Cooper finding the appeal did not meet the necessary threshold of general importance.
The powerlines, installed by the Ministry of Works in the late 1950s, stretch across Rangataua Bay. They have long been a source of contention for the Maungatapu Marae Trustees of Ngāti Hē – the landowners of the rohe in which the Opopoti marae lies.
Consents were granted by Tauranga City Council and Bay of Plenty Regional Council in 2018 to replace the current powerlines. However, the Tauranga Environmental Protection Society challenged those consents on behalf of Marae Trustees - who opposed the new plans, which included the erection of a large power pole near the marae.
The Environment Court initially upheld consents. However, last May, Justice Matthew Palmer ruled in the High Court that the replacement plan for the power lines is not in line with 'Ngāti Hē's rangatiratanga, guaranteed to them by article two of the Treaty of Waitangi” and remitted the consent application.
It was this decision that Transpower appealed this week.
However, Transpower's case hinged on whether their appeal ‘involves a matter of general or public importance, or a miscarriage of justice may have occurred or may occur unless the appeal is heard.'
Transpower framed 12 questions of law as part of their argument but the Court of Appeal considered the first two questions as 'essentially” the same; can the High Court lawfully overturn the Environment Court's factual findings as an error of law? This question was not deemed to meet the threshold of general importance.
'It does not justify consideration by this Court,” reads the ruling.
The following 10 questions were considered moot by the rejection of the first two and the appeal application was denied, with Transpower having to pay the respondents costs.
Tauranga Environmental Protection Society chair Peter McArthur says he and his team are 'delighted” with the decision.
He is particularly happy for the Trustees of the Maungatapu Marae and the people of Ngāti Hē.
He also pays tribute to the late Tai Taikato, the former Trustee chairman, who fought for relocation of the powerlines away from the marae up until his death in March 2020.
'We are delighted for him and all of those who dipped into their pockets to fund this fight against the poor decisions originally made by both Tauranga City Council and Bay of Plenty Regional Council,” says McArthur.
'They both need to review their commitment to the quality of the built environment in Tauranga and their legal obligations to consider the rights of all parties in accordance with the RMA.”
Bay of Plenty Regional Council consents manager Reuben Fraser says BOPRC is currently considering the Court of Appeal's decision.
'Resource consents help us to sustainably manage and protect our environment and assessing both the environment and community's needs are top priorities in the consent application process,” he says.
'We look forward to reviewing the implications of this decision further over the coming days.”
Tauranga City Council environmental planning manager Dan Smith says they are also considering the implications of the decision. He expresses his understanding that consenting of infrastructure in areas of outstanding natural and cultural significance is a 'complicated RMA matter”.
'TCC supports hapū aspirations to look for alternative ways to facilitate power transmission that has less impact on areas of significance to the hapū, especially Te Ariki Pā, Maungatapu Marae and Te Tāhuna o Rangataua,” says Dan.
'However, TCC also needs to better understand how it can manage infrastructure that may impact on Tauranga Harbour.”
He says Council is not currently in a position to comment further as the decision was only received yesterday.
A spokesperson for Transpower says they only received the decision yesterday morning and will therefore 'be taking some time to consider the findings”
'We look forward to further discussion with local iwi, hāpu and the wider community in the near future,” says the spokesperson.
However, Tauranga Environmental Protection Society secretary Antoon Moonen says Transpower have never reached out to the Maungatapu Marae Trustees.
"Transpower are not and have never talked to the Maungatapu Marae Trustees who have the title on the land," says Antoon.
"TEPS has approached Transpower with written authorisation from the Maungatapu Marae Trustees to open discussions, but Transpower have not availed themselves to this opportunity.
"Why is Transpower not talking to the Maungatapu Marae Trustees?"
2 comments
Cost of under-ground cable
Posted on 05-02-2022 12:06 | By davidt5
By the time Transpower has paid all of the costs incurred in their legal twists and turns they may as well have put the cable underground and called it quits. They might be powerful, but they certainly know how to waste money.
Underground costs to high
Posted on 05-02-2022 18:23 | By Kancho
I doubt that it's possible to under ground and undersea the lines so would probably need to be re routed overhead lines for a long distance and of course on someone else patch . If the lines are the main transmission lines on the steel pylons the the voltage is higher than any very expensive underground cables will handle. A difficult problem indeed and mega expensive. Still put the power prices up high enough will eventually pay for the higher difficulties.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.