Tsunami sirens: ‘bigger is better’

Claims that the recent Christchurch tsunami sirens test went largely unheard are not new to one Tauranga City Councillor.

Councillor Bill Grainger is concerned about the council's decision to go ahead with the same electronic sirens as Christchurch and instead wants council to consider the installation of ‘air raid' type sirens.

A recent report on Christchurch's sirens indicated they were not heard by residents during a ‘test'.


Councillor Bill Grainger wants council to consider air raid tsunami sirens as opposed to electronic sirens.

'I told you so,” says Bill Grainger.

'It's just that was the biggest concern for me. The type of sirens I'm talking about are the Carter sirens that are known world-wide.

'They are based on the old World War Two type sirens, and those sirens penetrate. It's as simple as that, and not only that, they go the distance. Instead of 60 sirens, six or seven would do it, and that's all we need.

'I don't want that (electronic sirens) here in Tauranga. I want something that's going to be effective, that everybody can hear, and that's why I'm strongly supportive of those (world war two type).”

Councillors voted last week to select a tender for the sirens from the two remaining contenders, following a selection process.

Both siren installers are tendering on the basis of supplying 60 of the electronic sirens that will be placed on poles along the coast. The suppliers of the ‘air raid' type sirens didn't survive the pre selection process, staff told councillors.

At the council meeting Bill expressed concerns that the electronic sirens on 30ft poles are not going to be loud enough to wake people asleep in brick houses with double glazed windows. He wants the air raid type sirens because they have a sound that will penetrate.

City engineer Howard Severinsen says the claims of the air raid siren supplier, who took part in the selection process, were not credible and they weren't interested in taking part in the design/build process.

Bill's last plea at the council meeting for the use of the howlers fell on deaf ears.

During the debate councillors reminisced about the fire brigade noon siren that used to sound daily from 11th Avenue. It could be heard across the town, and as far as Greerton, and the Mount.

But the vote supported the staff selection process.

'It's time to get something up, otherwise we will still be sitting around when the tsunami arrives and we still won't have something up,” says Larry Baldock.

'Let's get this done. And if we are still unhappy, look at it another time.”

Councillors say there would be a risk factor of some people not hearing the sirens, no matter how many sirens were installed or how big they were.

Meanwhile Tauranga City Council is reassuring residents following the Christchurch tests.

Howard says the report about Christchurch sirens not being heard by residents during Saturday's test, cannot be compared to the decision made last week by the Tauranga City Council to install similar sirens along the coast line.

There are two major differences says Howard. The first is that the loudness of the sirens was not at the level it would be if they were being used in an actual emergency.

The second, and main reason, is that due to cost cutting the Christchurch City Council decided to only install 22 of the 79 sirens that were planned and needed.

New Brighton/Bexley had four sirens instead of the planned 10, at Sumner they installed three of the five planned and none were installed at all at Ferrymead where seven were planned.

People in those areas who were expecting to hear the 'test' even though it was only at 80 dB, which is lower than an emergency would use, would not have heard much at all, says Howard.

The Tauranga City Council's siren sound level will be at 105dB at 25 meters.

It is a shame that the expectations of Christchurch residents were not met in the test as it undermines the level of public confidence people have, says TCC Group Manager - City Services, Ian McDonald.

"In Tauranga we are installing sirens as a result of public feedback to the Council that said investment in sirens was a desirable warning system should one ever be needed,” says Ian. 'So the elected members made the decision to invest in the best technology available and staff are proceeding to finalise the tender for installation shortly."

38 comments

What others do

Posted on 25-07-2012 08:34 | By bigted

In Japan (they should know), alerts are broadcast immediately on television and radio. Surely dollars are better spent on investigating this excellent avenue of mass communication than a few sirens that might catch a few ears? As an aside, Nearby I have a household security alarm that sounds like a WWII siren...


Tsunami Sirens

Posted on 25-07-2012 08:39 | By Owen G

You're on to it Bill they are about as good as the useless electronic railway crossing signals being installed these days. The siren you are talking about is the same as the old fire siren. It could be heard clearly all over town. They still have one in Te Puke ask anyone there. Owen Goodrick


Incorrect ...

Posted on 25-07-2012 08:43 | By Murray.Guy

Says Ian. 'So the elected members made the decision to invest in the best technology available and staff are proceeding to finalise the tender for installation shortly." ... INCORRECT. By majority elected members chose the staff recommended 'easy pathway' that avoided ensuring the very best outcome - lives saved. TCC did NOT evaluate all options, did not test the preferred 'air raid type' siren as it did not meet resource consent and 'impact on the ear' best practice guidelines. 6-10 sirens of significance clearly have reduced installation costs over 60, clearly have greater penetration of structures and distance.


Grainger may be right on this one

Posted on 25-07-2012 09:19 | By Phailed

My thoughts on Cr Grainger took a big plunge after his opposition to the roundabout traffic lights at that Maungatapu intersection. They are especially good for the less secure drivers. But he may have a point on this. It seems stupid to install sirens that are softer when there are louder options. I hope the pussyfooting Resource Management Act hasn't got something to answer for here. I can't understand Cr Baldock's saying let's do it and if unhappy we can look at it again. Is money being spent again to fix an inadequate solution something Cr Baldock has plenty of? I guess any Council that can loan $5 million to Baypark must be made of the stuff????


trust the council with your LIFE?

Posted on 25-07-2012 09:26 | By The Tomahawk Kid

I can't quite make up my mind who the biggest fools are! Is it the council who insist on spending thousands on an ineffective system to warn us of an approaching tsunami with as much chance of being heard as a fart in a thunderstorm, or is it those people living in coastal areas who chose to put their lives and trust in the hands of the council (all care - no responsibility) to protect the most sacred thing in the universe - their LIVES. A difficult choice. I believe people making such life threatening decisions (with other peoples money) should be held responsible for the outcomes of their decisions, and should be in posession of extensive insurance policies to protect them from the unfavourable outcomes of poor decision making. Failing that, they should remove themselves from the decision-making process, and leave it up to those whose lives 'are” at stake. I would not trust the council with something as trifling as filling a swimming pool with hot water, let alone with my life. But that is socialism at work for you - do-gooders trying to be everything to everyone, and failing at both, delivering mediocre solutions for premium prices whether you like them or not. I suggest asking survivors of the Blitz if they had trouble hearing the air raid sirens during WWII for the solution.


Air Raid Sirens

Posted on 25-07-2012 10:00 | By tabatha

Is it not obvious a penertrating siren like the old air raid sirens will be far more effective. Notice how many car drivers actually hear the modern day electronic sirens in emergency vehicles! Bill stick to your guns, it almost needs the thought of the referendum ideas for the public, but that is right we have no rights we elect and stuck with mighty then thou councillors, swollen headed and do not listen to the public, public know nothing, well so the elected few say. Decent sirens and let us hope they are never needed. Also possibly easier to repair than electronic type.


INCREDIBLE!!

Posted on 25-07-2012 10:35 | By penguin

Once again we have supposedly astute and knowledgeable council staff and councillors making bad decisions in the face of stark REALITY! How many of them have ever been a volunteer fire fighter relying on the VERY EFFECTIVE sound of a WW2 type siren? I have been a volunteer and lived 5km from the station and heard nearly all siren calls - ONE siren had this effect! Isn't it about time ‘elected' members woke up to the fact that REALITY IS REALITY and the overwhelming evidence is that the electronic sirens are not effective? Who will take responsibility in the real event if people drown because they did not hear pathetic electronic ‘gadgetry'? And the comment from Larry Baldock defies belief - 'Let's get this done. And if we are still unhappy, look at it another time.”Well Larry, let me know how much it will cost to ‘look at it another time' and I will withhold an amount from my rates bill payment!


WHAT VALUE A LIFE?

Posted on 25-07-2012 10:54 | By penguin

I have just re-read part of Murray's comments that, apparently, one of the reasons the WW2 sirens were not considered is that they did not meet RESOURCE CONSENT REQUIREMENTS!! I am struggling not to say what I really feel about this - SO RESOURCE CONSENT NOW CONTROLS OUR PERSONAL SAFETY AND SURVIVIAL???? This is unbelievable in the extreme. Which planets do some of these people come from? Oh, I know - I forgot that we now live in a world governed by unworkable theoretical protocols and rabid PC'ness....


Resource Consent Process An Ass

Posted on 25-07-2012 11:27 | By tabatha

I thought there were ways around things. Time resource consent was challenged for proper safety. Where does OSH really stand on the matter. Oh I know the sound may deafen someone, does not matter if they drown in the process. Murray start working for the good sense and push resource consent right to the edge, it has reached the end of it's day when it comes before lives.


Tsunami Sirens

Posted on 25-07-2012 12:11 | By Linaire

Have the Council not heard of the saying : "Do it once, and do it right"!! If Japan's tsunami is anything to go by, a decent tsunami in Tauranga could travel up to 10kms inland - its not just people on the immediate coast that need to be warned. A few loud air raid sirens, like the old fire siren in Te Puke, installed at appropriate places, would be able to be heard from Bethlehem to at least Papamoa East/Welcome Bay. The sooner we have another election to vote some of these idiots out of Council, the better!


.

Posted on 25-07-2012 12:50 | By CC8

What a crock of ****. Just forget the sirens and get anyone who is concerned to register their cellphone number (s) for a txtbomb the day the Tsunami is coming. Mark my words these things will ROT on poles and die before they are use in anger. They WILL NOT survive the onslaught of the salt air at Papamoa. Some theiving maintainence company will charge mega dollars to "service them " one a month or so for years and years and when the time comes they will be next to useless. As someone else said you can't even hear the "new" electronic alarm bells at Matapihi Road, when you are parked next to them.


.

Posted on 25-07-2012 12:59 | By CC8

Keep going you idiots..."Councillors"....you won't have a job in two years time. By then your illustrious leader will have dragged you and us further into the mire and probably ensure that no one will want to attempt to fix the problems you are creating. Staff ( and Mayor) hell-bound on having the latest electronic wizardry techy gizmos and showy edifices , that they can't possibly live without, are dragging this city into the same debt ridden HELL that Detroit and New York and many other "show off" cities find themselves in. You will be GONE come the next elections.


Air Raid Type Sirens - Yes

Posted on 25-07-2012 13:46 | By Jitter

Classic Flyers museum, adjacent to the airport, have a genuine working WW II air raid siren which they fire up occaisionally for school visits. It is not on a pole but on a trolley at ground level. When I am at home and it is fired up I can hear it clearly. I live at Papamoa about halfway between Bayfair and The Plaza just around the corner from the bottom of Pacific View Road. If it was located on a 10 metre pole it would be heard over a much wider area. Instead of a number of small weak electronic sirens why not purchase half a dozen of this type (air raid or fire sirens) as they cover a far wider area. As peoples lives are at risk, which don't really matter, TCC seem intent on doing it on the cheap rather than going for the more effective option.


Papamoaner

Posted on 25-07-2012 14:39 | By Papamoaner

With regard to the comments of CC8. there are old air raid sirens on coasts all over the place. Some have been there for 40 years with no problems. The cellphone texting has been found to fail during disasters because of sudden overloading. Try to address the argument instead of calling others abusive names. We all have opinions and they are all valid to us.


Completely unnecessary

Posted on 25-07-2012 16:02 | By Ken Ring

The idea is completely pointless, and is just riding the coat tails of other alarmists, equally uninformed. Any tsunami can only come from Chile, 12 hours away. By the time it reaches Papamoa all the media will have alarmed everyone sufficiently such that the locally installed expensive siren bells will be playing to no one. There have been only 4 tsunami scares in the whole settled history of NZ, and no loss of life or significant damage. In that time there have been over 2 million recorded earthquakes. So where is the risk? About the same as being hit by a falling giraffe. Surely there are more things to spend ratepayers money on, like reducing rates?


WHY A NOISE LIMIT?

Posted on 25-07-2012 16:14 | By PLONKER

It is plain and simple that the sirens need to make a "LOT OF NOISE", there is no substitute for that, not hearing the warnings is not an option at all. About 8-10 real air raid sirens that would cost some $85k each, supply, install, solar power, the whole kit done. They have a radius of 3 kms or so, 8-10 along the Mount-Papamoa would do it. There is an issue with the background noises with the current little wee quiet ones as tested (besides no one heard them in Tauranga, and same results in CHCH) that the noises: traffic, sea, wind affect the carry of the noise/volume. So plant the poles well back off the beach for teeh best coverage


IN THE YEAR 1400 ...

Posted on 25-07-2012 16:30 | By PLONKER

There was a Tsunami, the wave travelled 7.5+kms inland and was estimated to be 4.8m high at the coast. That is small compared to the Indian Ocean one in 2004, that was about 10m high.


Papamoaner

Posted on 25-07-2012 19:52 | By Papamoaner

Not quite right Ken. The powerful 1921 tsunami that did extensive damage at Chatham islands is one example, and scientists are at a loss to name the cause. If White Island blows, we could get a good one.


Colossal waste of money

Posted on 25-07-2012 22:22 | By Ken Ring

Sorry Papamoaner, I don't call one in 90 years a significant risk. We are talking four ifs away. If White Island blows, if it is >7.4mag, if it is <10kms deep and if it happens at high tide. That does not dent the original risk figure of 0.0002%.


Tsunami sirens?

Posted on 25-07-2012 22:41 | By Murray.Guy

I have long been of the belief that communities (cities) should have a public emergency awareness strategy (systems) in place. It frustrates me that in this instance the Council, and as a result, the community, focus solely on the risk of a Tsunami and coastal inundation. In the event of a emergency, a disaster, be it affecting a small geographical area or city wide, the whole city will be impacted on. Sirens alert residents, encourages them to check their radios, tv's, cell phones, etc. Sirens are just one tool in a suite of options. A Community Disaster Awareness System. To focus on 'Tsunami' sirens serves only to detract from what is really required.


BEACH BOYS - WIPE OUT - WHITE ISLAND

Posted on 25-07-2012 23:32 | By YOGI

Sirens will be a waste of time if it blows mate, the wave will be onto the beach in five minutes i.e. Matata Wakatane and so on. maybe 10 minutes to Mount Maunganui. End result is that no one would be able to get out in time to escape it all, just a bit of random luck will be about it.


Tsunami/emergency sirens

Posted on 26-07-2012 12:53 | By Linaire

Just thinking .... If the council is going to go ahead with whatever option they prefer, where are these sirens going to be installed? Not too close to the beach I hope. After reading Murray Guy's comments, I think I prefer his idea of a "suite of options", with the sirens being just part of that, rather than the whole answer. Another issue that needs looking at is escape routes, especially for the likes of the Matua peninsula (with one road in and out), downtown Mount, and all of Papamoa. Basically if you are there, and need to get out in a hurry with everyone else, you are stuck behind everyone else trying to do the same thing!! The sirens are not going to save you then.


YES MURRAY

Posted on 26-07-2012 13:26 | By PLONKER

The risk come from Tsunami's, fires, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, floods and more, to single out Tsunamis and only make issue on this is certainly naive, most likely at present an emotional knee jurk reaction in part, but it does reflect the lack of rediness for a significant disaster, that includes an adequate warning system. Hawaii is preapred for Tsunami's, Tauranga could be and that then allows a "tick in the box" so one less to worry about.


PROPER SIRENS ONE MORE TOOL IN THE ARSENAL

Posted on 26-07-2012 21:18 | By KAMIKAZE

Well certainly sirens by themselves won't save lives but 'air raid' type sirens with volume will give warning to people of an impending danger at a minimal cost.Clearly Hawaii thinks they are necessary as they are currently upgrading their old siren system with new up to date technology producing the same noise output.They have much more experience and expertise than us so dwell on that folks !!


To the

Posted on 27-07-2012 16:16 | By Papamoaner

Who would ever had thought there would be a big earthquake in Christchurch? The Japanese now acknowledge that despite some earlier problems with various warning strategies, that thousands of lives were actually saved by sirens in their most recent event. No matter what the odds are, it makes good sense to provide the best mix of warning methods, especially where the cost is not exorbitant. A submarine landslide in the Kermadecs would give Tauranga about a 1 hour warning of a tsunami - sufficient to potentially save thousands of lives if the sirens are clearly heard and acted upon. pre-recorded radio broadcasts automatically triggered by the sirens would be a powerful tool. It works very well in the USA for tornado warnings. That's why there is massive structural damage, but minimal loss of life.


PAPAMOANER

Posted on 28-07-2012 16:39 | By TERMITE

CHCH, don't think so, New Zealand's name in geological circles is "The Shaky Ils", this place is on the move and caught between two lumps of dirt that are under pressure and some. In that scale of things earthquakes are a sure thing, just a case of where and when not if or maybe.


Sirens

Posted on 29-07-2012 08:05 | By Papamoaner

Anyway, it seems rather strange that they have decided on a type of siren that doesn't seem to work very well anywhere, when they haven't even tested a type that seems to work everywhere, and costs much less. What is going on?


PAPAMOANER

Posted on 31-07-2012 14:50 | By PLONKER

Simple really, it will not matter after teh wave goes through.


NO COMPLAINTS ?

Posted on 05-08-2012 11:20 | By TERMITE

With sirens that are known not to work properly so as to provide the warning needed to all, the result is obvious, a Tsunami will leave not trace of trhe mistakes made nor will there be any witnesses or anyone complaining afterwards.


Name the Councillors

Posted on 07-08-2012 10:33 | By Adrian Muller

I live within 200 metres of the Alexandra Place siren test location, and on the morning of the trial I heard nothing of it, even though I was listening. I did hear the local Fire Station siren, located 2 kms away, though, mid-morning, and initially thought that must have been the tsunami siren, but it was not. I ask Murray Guy to name the councillors who voted against the offer of a free testing of tsunami sirens by that rival company I trust it does not include the two Papamoa councillors. I will raise this as an issue at the next Papamoa Progressive Association meeting.


NAME THE COUNCILORS ???

Posted on 12-08-2012 14:15 | By TERMITE

Not likely, all in the secret meetings deep in the bowls of TCC remain hidden from those paying the ratepayer.


Tell me its just a joke- Right?

Posted on 15-08-2012 08:36 | By KAMIKAZE

60 mini sirens sounds like Xmas tree lights doesn't it.Get on with it TCC and install the real deal because you may be playing with peoples lives here.


ADRIFT FLOATERS

Posted on 15-08-2012 12:46 | By YOGI

60 v 7, seems an obvoius choice except of course if you are being paid to dip into the public coffers to recommend the "best" option, but who is it actually best for, the consultants or the ratepatyers?


SIREN STUPIDITY

Posted on 16-08-2012 20:40 | By Hebegeebies

COUNCIL STAFFER HOWIE SEVERINSEN CR. BALDOCK AND THE REST OF CROSBYS CLIQUE HAVE GOT IT COMPLETELY WRONG.


Papamoa Progressive Association Invitation

Posted on 17-08-2012 17:10 | By Adrian Muller

I raised the issue of Tsunami sirens at the Papamoa Progressive Association. The Councillor there, David Stewart, commented that the offer by that chap who would give a 'free demonstration', was "not up to muster' in his [aplication. It seemed that regardless of the merits of a louder siren, because he did not follow some sort of 'procedure', his application was ignored. I have asked the president of the PPA, Steve Morris, to invite different Tsunani Siren applicants to attend the next meeting. Let's hope there is a real exchange of opinion there next time. Come along and listen at the Papamoa Library next month!


Papamoa Prog assn Adrian Muller

Posted on 18-08-2012 14:10 | By Tony Valley

Good points Adrian but this is an old article and only a few of us will see your comments now. You need to get these good words onto the news section on the front page so that those decision makers with vision impairment get to see them. They probably don't see beyond headlines with the blinkers on, so they don't even have a feel for the amount of public opinion that is against them.


Resource consent rubbish

Posted on 18-08-2012 14:30 | By Tony Valley

A good way to deal to the Resource management act before it puts lives at risk, would be to get Winston to raise it in the house. Does anyone have a channel to Winston?


It's not 60 v's 7

Posted on 18-08-2012 22:58 | By Murray.Guy

ADRIFT FLOATERS Posted on 15-08-2012 12:46 | By YOGI 60 v 7, seems an obvoius choice except of course if you are being paid to dip into the public coffers to recommend the "best" option, but who is it actually best for, the consultants or the ratepatyers? WRONG, WRONG WRONG ... The 60 is covering ONLY, at best, a third of our city. The estimate to cover our complete city with the preferred sirens is 200, with air raid type sirens at 10.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.