Fuel tax cuts: Opposition parties give Govt “F”

National Party leader Christopher Luxon says people need a break from the rising cost of living. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver.

Opposition parties across the political spectrum have given the government a 'fail' grade over its temporary fuel tax cuts.

Fuel taxes have been slashed by 25 cents a litre for the next three months as the government acts to counter soaring petrol prices.

National Party leader Christopher Luxon says the petrol tax tweaks will provide some relief but does not address the wider cost of living crisis.

"It's not just fuel that's gone up and petrol prices that are going up; food's up 13 per cent and weekly rents are up $150 a week. People deserve a break.

"The best way we think to do that is adjusting the tax thresholds; returning the extra tax Labour's grabbing from inflation back to people so they've got cash in their pockets."

Luxon estimates this could save the average earner $870 a week, while the ACT Party says it could deliver $187 per person through its 'carbon tax refund' policy.

ACT leader David Seymour says the refund will be taken up through the Emissions Trading Scheme and come out of what he calls the government's "climate slush fund".

ACT leader David Seymour. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver.

"We could have given $750 [each year] back to an average family of four. In order to make those sorts of savings under Labour's scheme you'd have to buy 3000 litres a year."

The Green Party supported the halving of all public transport fares from April 1 but had also made clear it could not get on board with fuel excise cuts.

Co-leader James Shaw says direct payment supports - through the welfare system or via tax credits - is a better, greener way to go.

Green Party co-leader James Shaw says direct payment supports would have been better than fuel excise cuts. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver.

"If we'd been able to provide some support either through the income support system or the tax system then people would have the choice about how to spend that money.

"If you only do it through fuel taxes then it's confined to that domain."

Shaw says the Green Party is also concerned there is no guarantee petrol companies will not just absorb the fuel tax cuts into their profits.

Minister of Energy and Resources Megan Woods has asked fuel businesses to share their rolling seven-day average fuel margins to monitor industry profits.

This disclosure is based on goodwill but Woods says she has spoken to several fuel companies and they are supportive of passing every cent on to customers.

"They all seemed very amenable to these changes. They can see on the forecourts of their petrol stations the impact this is having on Kiwis when they fill up their cars."

As the conflict at Ukraine's border and the Covid-19 pandemic wear on, it is unclear if fuel prices will be worse, better or the same in three months' time.

The government will review the fuel excise cuts before they end and has promised any drawbacks will be phased and only when fuel prices stabilise.

-RNZ/Anneke Smith.

7 comments

Luxon interests are for the top 1%

Posted on 15-03-2022 07:49 | By 2up

National can give Auckland a local fuel tax cut but if Labour gives the whole of New Zealand a fuel tax cut its a Fail. Luxon wants tax cuts for the rich only.


@By 2up

Posted on 15-03-2022 08:58 | By Merlin

And National want to give landlords tax credits also .Shows who they want to support doesn't it. Those on higher income come out best with their policies on tax cuts. Nothing new here.


Targeting

Posted on 15-03-2022 10:06 | By Kancho

Dropping tax on one item that is in fact a tax on top of a tax is a small gesture that helps a little. Inflation was already way ahead before the Ukrainian sanctions so whilst helpful it's only for a short time. Clearly some are finding it really much tougher and would have hoped that better targeting to these people get more assistance through various agencies.


national + act

Posted on 15-03-2022 10:39 | By kiwi_brat2003

Both there schemes are for workers only tax scheme not people who have lost jobs or are on the benefit. One would be lucky not to loose money from the likes of National as they don't like people on benefits and take money from them. Oops did I let slip that it was them that reduced the benefits. people have very low memories.


Resentment 2up

Posted on 15-03-2022 10:40 | By Slim Shady

No it’s not, which is why he’s up in the polls. He’s for hard working, ordinary workers and SM businesses. And you should be thankful because Labour is just making everybody worse off by continually throwing fuel on the inflation fire with borrowed money. This bloke has business and economic brains. To suggest he’s only for 1% I think is a reflection of your resentment.


Hmmm 2up

Posted on 15-03-2022 11:14 | By Let's get real

Doesn't Auckland have any problems with low-income families etc or is that just another Labour misunderstanding...? An additional 10c per litre for years on top of escalating cost of living increases for the most "vulnerable" communities in the country... Might need to reconsider your allegiances


@kiwibrat

Posted on 15-03-2022 15:50 | By Slim Shady

Who’s on benefits? Businesses are desperate for staff. I’ve lost count of the number of “staff wanted” signs recently. Ooops, am I suggesting there are some people who are just bone idle and want someone else to pay for their existence?


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.