The Port of Tauranga's application to extend its wharves and shipping channel by dredging 1.8 million cubic metres of seabed will be heard in the Environment Court on Monday.
A panel of four judges will hear the case, which skipped the usual process of regional council hearings after it argued a decision on the proposed extension was an urgent national priority.
The company, which is 54 per cent owned by the Bay of Plenty Regional Council but publicly listed, says it will run out of capacity within three years if the extension to its operations did not go ahead.
It has already been declined by the Government's shovel-ready and Covid fast track infrastructure schemes, putting the project behind schedule, it says.
Given there may be delays via appeals from the Environment Court process, it needs an urgent hearing, it says.
'The port wishes to progress the resource consents as soon as possible, given the urgent need or capacity in New Zealand's supply chain and Port of Tauranga Limited ‘s (POTL) crucial role in resolving this as New Zealand's busiest port,” court documents say.
Without the development, New Zealand is looking at 'severe” capacity constraints on exports within a few years, the company says.
The Ministry of Environment declined the previous Covid-19 fast-track application saying it was more appropriate for the project to go through a standard consenting process, because there was a fair expectation submitters should be involved.
The port's application to the Environment Court showed the port applied for a resource consent for a 385m wharf extension and 1.8h reclamation at Sulphur Point, as well as wharf extensions of 530m north, and 388m south, of the tanker berth and a 2.9ha reclamation on its Mt. Maunganui wharves.
It says the associated extension to the shipping channel covers 14.4ha and involves dredging up to 1.8 million cubic metres.
The new development will allow the port to host several large ships at once, it says.
It notified the Tauranga Airport Authority and iwi about its plans in 2021.
Three submissions were received in response, two in opposition from iwi groups and one in support from the Tauranga Airport Authority.
A submission was also made by Ngāti He, who the port say was not notified, but had placed a submission nonetheless.
Documents show 10 iwi and hapū groups are party to the case, alongside the port and the regional council.
Hearings will run for 10 days, with half of those planned to be heard at Whareroa Marae.
If its application is successful, the port estimates the project will take nearly three years to complete, and cost $68.5m.
It's expected to create about 368 jobs in the construction phase and more than 81 permanent jobs after completion.
Tauranga port handles 42 per cent of New Zealand's container traffic, more than 850,000 containers a year.
Its previous application to extend, which included widening and deepening its shipping channels, was a four-year process, ending in 2013 when then-conservation minister Nick Smith gave the project the green light.
Smith says he granted resource consent after local iwi had blocked the plan under the old Resource Management Act.
The consent's conditions included restrictions on dredging, and the development of a Kaimoana Restoration Programme to mitigate the effects on local seafood especially the pipi beds, and extra funding for research.
7 comments
Get on with it
Posted on 10-07-2022 10:06 | By First Responder
This is a project that must happen. All the political crap and environmental handbrakes need to be overuled. It's alright for those couch potatoes that don't work and live on the dole, but normal kiwis want to see this country moving forward. Make it happen, and make it fast.
Hmmm
Posted on 10-07-2022 11:52 | By Let's get real
We can't live in the Stone age any longer. Without port development, housing over horse-racing and roading over cycleways, Tauranga will become even more of an enclave for the wealthy and mired in spiritual beliefs that hold no relevance in the modern world. We want to foot-it with the rest of the world when it comes to technology, lifestyle and medical developments, just as long as we can continue to live in our caves with a money tree growing in the neighbours garden. No wonder our educated youth are leaving... They're seeing progress and new developments in other parts of the world.
@ First Responder
Posted on 10-07-2022 12:44 | By Yadick
Totally agree with you. Those that are holding up and trying to hold up this development need a good swift kick aside. Whether it's now or whether it's in the future this development will and must happen. Unfortunately those standing deliberately in the way don't have the nouse to realise just how much more this is going to cost due to ridiculous delays. As First Responder says, "make it happen and make it fast".
@first responder
Posted on 10-07-2022 13:08 | By Kancho
I agree. As an export country we need this but I fear the iwi objections will prevail as the government is set on co governance as in three waters fifty percent iwi veto power and even the right to put levies on water to fund iwi etc . We rely on export live on imported food and goods. Our country doesn't rate that well in OECD countries for productivity so we need a the help we can get
We all know...
Posted on 10-07-2022 13:46 | By morepork
... this needs to happen. Blocking it will be a money maker for some people, using superstition and religious belief which should have no bearing on it. Funny how the spirits are appeased once a few million $ flow their way... The ONLY objections to this should be on practical and verifiable solid grounds that can be discussed, argued, and mitigated. It is totally wrong for any sector of the community to put a brake on the progress of the rest of it, without tangible and realistic grounds. Are we going to have outrigger canoes carrying our containers? Technology demands progress, and the wealth of our nation depends on it.
Kancho and morepork
Posted on 11-07-2022 08:17 | By Yadick
Well said. Morepork, your first half spells it out perfectly.
Delayed
Posted on 12-07-2022 15:28 | By Kancho
The court has again deferred the hearing so not going anywhere. This process ragged out for over a year and the cost has escalated by 20 million and climbing. The government refused to fast track so frustrating efforts. The country will pay for these delays for sure
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.