“Bad behaviour threatens progress” - LGNZ

LGNZ President Stuart Crosby.

A new survey of elected members in local government has found that nearly half of respondents have experienced racism, gender discrimination, or other forms of harmful behaviour while doing their job in public office.

'The purpose of the survey was to better understand the experiences that elected officials face at work and touched on topics such as diversity, inclusion, bullying and harassment,” says LGNZ President Stuart Crosby.

'In recent years, we've seen a small uptick in the number of Māori, women and young elected members around the table.

'We need our councils to reflect the diversity in our communities and this type of behaviour puts the progress we've begun to make at risk.”

'Local government is full of hard-working, community-minded people, but ultimately, we're all responsible for making sure our workplaces and communities are safe spaces where everyone gets the chance to contribute,” says LGNZ Chief Executive Susan Freeman-Greene.

'Many candidates have already started their campaigning for this year's local body election. I am, however, concerned about some of the behaviour and rhetoric even in these early stages.

'The campaign trail is a powerful platform for positive change, so we really want candidates to use it to engage with the important issues facing our communities. We know there's a more inclusive and productive way to get their voice heard.

'LGNZ is working hard to make sure local government is a safe and inclusive environment for all elected members and new candidates.

'The government has recently removed the requirement for residential addresses to be published on campaign advertising. LGNZ raised this issue with the Prime Minister so it's great to see the Government's moved swiftly on this issue.

'This goes a long way to making candidates feel more protected when they put their hand up. We're also providing candidates the tools they need to run a safe campaign and elected members to do their job once they take office.

'This includes a new code of conduct and a refreshed induction programme following October's election.

'We're also launching a clean campaigning guide that's been developed in partnership with the Human Rights Commission. It lays out inclusive guidelines for those running.

'On top of that we've seen fantastic engagement in our ‘Make a Stand' Zoom series, which is open to aspiring candidates as well as existing elected members and covers off everything you need to know to run an effective campaign,” says Susan Freeman-Greene.

'The survey results make for tough reading, but to shift the dial, we need to start with acknowledging that there is a problem and find ways to address it,” says Crosby.

A total of 105 anonymous responses were received from across 56 local authorities. Key findings include:

  • 5 per cent of respondents experienced racism, gender discrimination in their role
  • 43 per cent of respondents experienced other harassment, prejudiced, threatening or derogatory behaviours in their role
  • Close to a quarter of respondents are not sure how to report instances of harassment and/or discrimination
  • Less than a third of respondents felt connected with other elected members in their workplace.

'Local democracies across the globe are grappling with issues around councillors, mayors and other elected members being bullied or harassed on the job. It's not an issue exclusive to New Zealand or even just our sector. But that is not an excuse not to address it in our sector,” says Crosby.

Nominations for 2022 local body elections opened on Friday, July 15, and close at noon August 12.

For a full rundown on what it takes to stand in your local elections, you can check out the 2022 Candidate Guide here.

11 comments

Oh suck it up

Posted on 20-07-2022 06:50 | By Mein Fuhrer

You bunch of socks, as elected members you can expect harsh criticism but being offended and upset by words and opinions is pathetic and childish. Grow up!


Softies

Posted on 20-07-2022 07:58 | By Thats Nice

Absolutely agree with Mein Fuhrer. Everyone is so fragile and thin skinned these days. Can people not have an opinion without softies taking it the wrong way and saying it's hate speech or something pathetic like that?


Anyone who

Posted on 20-07-2022 09:11 | By R. Bell

dismisses reaction to racist comments or deliberate insult as " pathetic and childish" completely misses the point. Elected members are there to represent us in leadership roles, NOT to be insulted on race or gender. Anyone guilty of such insulting conduct should automatically be dismissed, even from elected office. Problem fixed.


Examples please Stuart.

Posted on 20-07-2022 11:03 | By Accountable

Stuart hunts with the hounds and runs with the hares. Give the public some examples to prove what you say Stuart. It's all to easy to agree on a subject such as this but we never see the proof. Those that profess to be affected, from my observations, appear to be the radicals of society and the average person of any race has virtually no issues in their day to day activities. If some seek some will find!


I was agreeably surprised...

Posted on 20-07-2022 11:18 | By morepork

... that only 5% experienced Racism or Genderism. While that still needs to be addressed, it is much better than it would have been 30 years ago. I understand the points from Mein Fuhrer and Thats Nice and I have always advocated here that people at risk need to be able to deal with insulting and denigrating words from idiots who know no better. The trick is to be less sensitive and recognize it is only words. If the intention is to wound then simply don't let that goal be achieved. Take legal action in extreme cases, but don't just curl up and cry because someone said something hurtful. Our PC society has made it easier to be vulnerable and scream "hate speech". The schoolyard adage comes to mind: "Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names will never hurt me." People hate. Get over it.


Distraction

Posted on 20-07-2022 11:30 | By Hugh Janis

Gender, race etc etc are all a distraction from what is really happening. Be wise, open your eyes, and prepare for hell. It is coming sooner than you think.


Rubbish

Posted on 20-07-2022 11:58 | By Let's get real

If we had candidates that actually had something to offer at meetings other than diversity, we would actually have the making of a quorum that could make decisions for the betterment of everyone. If you believe that you're qualified to make reasoned, dispassionate and expensive decisions just because you're young, old or different, then there's something wrong with those that elected you into the position. We require quality over and above all other considerations. It's about the community as a whole... Not a tiny part of it.


the Rose experience

Posted on 20-07-2022 14:37 | By Bill S

Stuart, you were party to the discrimination within Enviroment BoP when Councillor Rose was discriminated against on his age and experience.This was swept under the carpet. Time for you to move on.


Zero tolerance for racism

Posted on 20-07-2022 15:30 | By R. Bell

and genderism. Zero tolerance for deliberate insult to and from elected members. It is not about being fragile or thin skinned, it is about civilized debate between grown up adults intent on better outcomes, not wasting valuable time at tax payers expense playing school yard insults.


Seems pretty low

Posted on 20-07-2022 15:49 | By Avman

Only 5% discrimination seems pretty good then, what is the problem? In terms of not expecting any criticism at all, well, that is what happens when you try to do things that destroy people's lives, people will complain. If politicians don't like the complaints, then perhaps they shouldn't propose preposterous evil things that destroy people's lives in the first place, like 3 Waters. It's pretty simple really.


Goes with the territory

Posted on 20-07-2022 16:55 | By Kancho

Certainly being easily offended or over sensitive is a difficult road if you want to politic. Certainly many sane people would not put themselves forward nor understand what they are getting into. One needs a lot of skills and not stand on a one issue platform as some seem to. There will always be a few people that play the person not the ball. See it on here too. Best shrug it off as a lack of understanding of debate and a poor reflection on them. Usually the attempt to denigrate or mock actually is seen by most for what it is and any point or argument lost or sidelined.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.