Labour alone in support of Three Waters bill

Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta. Photo: Robert Kitchin/Stuff.

The Government has passed its major Three Waters reform bill into law, with Labour the only party supporting the controversial legislation.

Labour voted the Water Services Entities Bill through its third reading in the House on Thursday morning, laying the groundwork for four public water entities to be created by July 2024.

It comes after a torrid week in which the party reversed an 'entrenchment” clause it entered into the bill two weeks ago.

The bill was opposed by National and ACT, both of which have promised to repeal the reforms. It was also opposed for the first time by the Green Party, as the public ownership of water assets would not be entrenched in law as the party hoped, and by the Māori Party as it fell short of proper 'co-governance”.

The new law marked another step on a long road for the Three Waters reforms, which was spurred on by a report into an outbreak of campylobacter in Havelock North's water supply in 2016, which hospitalised 45 people and possibly contributed to the death of three people.

Though many agree the country's patchy and inadequate water services need reform, the Government's proposed creation of four public water entities to manage water has caused ire across the country, including from many councils who argued they would lose control of valuable water assets and claimed local democracy was being reduced.

Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta, speaking in the House, says the Government wanted to 'fix a problem that has been left to languish for the last two decades”.

'Just this morning we heard of the water contamination issues in Waimate. Just last week in the Matamata-Piako district we heard of a community on a boil water notice, and they are not isolated events.

"But, sadly, no one is outraged because it's a common experience and all communities want the problem to be fixed.”

The Water Services Entities Act would enact the substantive portion of the Government's reform of the country's Three Waters – drinking, waste, and storm water. Four new public water entities that span the country would take control of water assets from councils, and councils would receive a 'shareholding” of the new entities.

High-level representative groups that would oversee the water entities' professional boards would be split 50/50 between appointees from the various councils and mana whenua, under the principle of 'co-governance” – a particularly controversial aspect of the reform.

Standards for water services, including drinking water quality, will be regulated by a new authority already created, Taumata Arowai.

'We know that if we do nothing, the significant cost of fixing this mess of water infrastructure will fall on future ratepayers–our kids, your kids, and the next generation. We know that New Zealanders can't afford that. I want the burden to fall on our kids,” Mahuta says.

National Party local government spokesperson Simon Watts says he had a direct message to people working on water infrastructure in councils across the country.

'The next 12 months will be unsettling and challenging but be forewarned; National will repeal this bill, undo the other statutory amendments, and dissolve any obligations created by this bill in regards to employment funding and financing. National will work with you, not against you.”

Green Party local government spokesperson Eugenie Sage says public ownership of water assets was 'absolutely critical” to ensure good water services, so the party would not support the bill without its entrenchment clause.

The Greens two weeks ago put forward a supplementary order paper, supported by Labour, which 'entrenched” public ownership of water assets by requiring any future law change occur only with 60% or Parliament's support or a public referendum.

After outcry from constitutional law experts at the use of an entrenchment clause for a matter that was not part of New Zealand's constitution, Labour accepted this was a 'mistake” and reversed the clause on Tuesday afternoon.

Te Paati Māori co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer says the party supported aspects of the law, though believed it would not implement proper co-governance.

'The conservative race-baiting campaign run by right-wing extremists and misinformation has been successful so far in whipping up opposition to any increase of Māori decision-making on water rights, and people don't even understand what these reforms are proposing.

'They do not even guarantee Māori representation, let alone iwi representation, on the actual governance entities.”

The Government will also introduce a bill before the end of the year to create an economic regulator for water services, as part of the reforms.

- Thomas Manch/Stuff.

12 comments

Really stuff'ed article

Posted on 08-12-2022 14:10 | By an_alias

Man just full of no sense and why I never read stuff to be honest. This is not about better services this is purely about controlling your lives through central control.


water

Posted on 08-12-2022 14:29 | By dumbkof2

even their close friends are abandoning the labour party


Well well

Posted on 08-12-2022 14:42 | By Shadow1

Goodbye democracy. Come on NZ, get rid of this sad Labour Party. Shadow1


Hmmm

Posted on 08-12-2022 14:55 | By Let's get real

Really makes me wonder just what someone has been doing in parliament for 28 years if this is their Opus Magna and it makes me wonder what (other than tribal affiliations) has brought this person into a position of ultimate influence over the lives of the whole country. The community where the rain falls should have ultimate control over the natural resource and NOT a body of people who have never had their credentials examined to establish their abilities to make professional decisions.


Waste of time

Posted on 08-12-2022 15:38 | By Slim Shady

They’re gone burgers. It will be repealed, so will never see the light of day. Unfortunately, in the meantime $millions (more) of taxpayers money will be wasted in the ‘groundwork’ for these entities. Just more wastage from Labour.


Terrible!

Posted on 08-12-2022 15:52 | By jed

This is absolute disaster for the country. Labour have effectively privatised water rights. It goes far beyond co-governance! Maori have almost absolute control over drinking water.


Even more

Posted on 08-12-2022 16:10 | By Kancho

They will be even more lonely after the next elections when their judgement by the people is complete. They have been the worst government and in spite of the spin and have made things worse. Their underhand way three waters has be handled not part of the manifesto and their ignoring submissions . The are many ways to make improvements but this is not the best way nor is it taking people with them . The so called team of five million hasn't been included or asked but 80,000 submissions not in favour they ignore. They must go for their mismanagement over six years where most poor performance in every measurable area


Resign already

Posted on 08-12-2022 17:10 | By Slim Shady

Everybody hates Labour. Even the Greens.


Minority rules

Posted on 08-12-2022 17:35 | By FRANKS

except in Parliament where Mahuta and cronies (aided by a do nothing Prime Minister) ignore the wishes of the majority of the citizens.


Bye bye!!

Posted on 08-12-2022 21:01 | By The Professor

Bye bye Jacinda and bye bye Labour. You have just hammered that final nail in the coffin. Enjoy your last months in Government!! This is the sort of thing that happens when loosers run the country. Thanks MMP.


It will be repealed...

Posted on 09-12-2022 00:29 | By morepork

... when the government changes. And, without being a "Right Wing Extremist", I oppose it on the grounds that it requires Race based appointment to uphold "co-government", which is not mentioned in the text or even the spirit of the Treaty of Waitangi. It is simply undemocratic and was an incredible waste of public money, sacrificed on the altar of woke administration. Glad to see all other Parties opposed it for various reasons.


Summed Up In One Sentence

Posted on 09-12-2022 07:37 | By Yadick

12th paragraph, last sentence . . .


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.