Retaining Tauranga's Racecourse Reserve as greenspace is a key concern for users, residents and mana whenua.
Tauranga City Council is looking at future options for the 85 hectares of crown reserve land the Tauranga racecourse and Tauranga Golf Club occupy.
The Greerton Maarawaewae study began in October 2021 and the council consulted on multiple options for the site before shortlisting three.
Option A includes a health precinct, sports fields and the golf course - this is the council's preferred option.
Option B is a large central park with sports fields, community spaces and connection to Kopurererua Valley, the golf course would remain but the racecourse and equestrian facilities would be relocated.
Option C is an enhanced status quo with the current users remaining but sports fields and connection to Kopurererua Valley added.
The council held public hearings on Monday and Tuesday after its final round of consultation last year.
At Monday's hearing, submitter Patricia Jones from the Tauranga Western Riding Club described the reserve as the 'jewel in the crown for Tauranga”.
She 'treasured” being able to ride at the facilities in Greerton.
As Tauranga became more built up the greenspace wasn't something that should be let go, she said.
Jones urged the commissioners to select Option C because once the 'fabulous greenspace is gone, it's gone.”
Ngāi Tamarāwaho representative Buddy Mikaere. File photo/SunLive.
Mana whenua, Ngāi Tamarāwaho representative Buddy Mikaere provided history of the site.
The land was confiscated from Ngāi Tamarāwaho after the Battle of Gate Pa and Te Ranga in 1864 and because it was used for the community the hapū did not seek return of the land in their treaty settlement, said Mikaere.
'If that land is now to be used for other purposes, such as housing and the new hospital site, then we want our interests to be prioritised,” he said.
Ngāi Tamarāwaho lodged a claim via the Treaty of Waitangi Act in February last year.
Mikaere said any change to the status of the land would trigger the treaty claim.
'We seek the return of the land if that is the case and we will contest any other decision vigorously.
'We are content for the land to remain a recreation reserve with the possibility of extending its uses.”
Mikaere is also on the Tauranga Racing Club board and acknowledged he could be viewed as having a conflict of interest.
'In this case, I want to make it clear that my first loyalty is to the hapū and my submission is made on their behalf.”
It was fortunate both the hapū and Racing Tauranga's interests appeared to largely coincide, he said.
After Mikaere's submission, commission chair Anne Tolley said he was 'conflicted” and that made it 'very difficult”.
Having another representative from Ngāi Tamarāwaho would be easier, she said.
Commission chair Anne Tolley. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.
Tolley reassured Mikaere that housing, which had been proposed earlier, was ruled out as an option.
Also in support of retaining the racecourse was Bay of Plenty Regional Councillor Andrew von Dadelszen.
He said Tauranga had 'bigger fish to fry” in terms of infrastructure in Tauranga, than relocating a racecourse.
'To shift it [the racecourse] and that lose greenspace for anything would be a crime in my view.”
von Dadelszen urged the commissioners to think about their greenspace and listen to their community.
'Just think carefully about judicial review risks because I sense some predetermination and being a hearing commissioner myself, I'm really careful on that in my council dealings.”
Tolley responded: 'I'm a bit concerned to hear you mention judicial review and predetermination.”
The council had been through a long process of consultation with a 'huge range of options”, she said.
'We've tried to be extremely open. We [the commissioners] have no pre-determination.”
Tauranga Golf Club chairman Paul Gartner said the club supported all three options because each one included the golf club, but the hospital was its least favoured option.
The club wanted to enter into a memorandum of understanding with the council in lieu of a lease renewal past its current one that ends in 2039.
'We would like some form of official documentation to know that we have got security of tenure,” said Gartner.
The club was experiencing members leaving, was 'struggling” with staff motivation and had delayed projects on the course because of uncertainty around the future, he said.
Tolley thanked the club for working with the council during the process and for their willingness to develop some of the walkways.
During formal consultation a total 897 submissions were received with 201 in support of Option A, 128 were in favour of Option B and the majority supported Option C with 548 people selecting it.
The hearings continued on Tuesday and the commissioners will decide on an option to recommend to the government on May 1.
Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air
12 comments
Ridiculous
Posted on 05-04-2023 13:08 | By Let's get real
The current location of the hospital is wrong. Access to the site for any kind of treatment is dependent on the time of day and traffic movements and parking for visitors and staff is abysmal..The fact that the racing club can use the treaty of waitangi act to halt eviction is disgusting, as is the decision to keep the golf course in place of housing that could benefit many local Maori and non-maori that are still living in sleepouts, converted garages and caravans in the backyards of friends and relatives. Watching horses and playing golf are pastime activities which have little or no interest to the great majority of the nation and should NEVER be subsidised by ratepayers and get special privileges from councillors.... That's how we got a speedway stadium.
Recreational facility merry go round
Posted on 05-04-2023 13:37 | By waiknot
It’s blatantly obvious with the differing sports are being relocated the current racing club would make an ideal location for speedway. After all there are grandstands already there.
Option C
Posted on 05-04-2023 14:01 | By Shadow1
We can all see what a slippery bunch the Conmissioners are. They have had feedback from ratepayers who are overwhelmingly in support of Option C. But still they aren’t willing to drop the issue. Well another option is the status quo. Then their staff can stop inventing more stupid options. Mr von Dadelszen said he could sense predeterination in Ms Tolley’s comments, which she denied, but the Commissioners have a plan and Option C is not the one. Shadow1
What is ACTUALLY a 'crime'
Posted on 05-04-2023 14:36 | By Bruja
Is Kiwis....mainly kids....growing up in garages, tents, sleepouts, overcrowded houses caravans and cars. HOUSE people THEN worry about 'green spaces'.
It’s been in the news
Posted on 05-04-2023 16:36 | By Andrew64
A government can’t force any following government to retain policies or changes they implement. Tolley and Co. will be gone latest June 2024. Nothing will happen by then. Their long range plan means nothing once a democratically elected Council is returned.
Get real: “Let’s get real”.
Posted on 05-04-2023 16:49 | By Shadow1
This is the largest green space we have. I personally don’t want to see it covered in houses or hospital buildings. I sure don’t want to know what your world will look like in a hundred years time. It was only months ago that central government’s parody of a health system said that they were about to spend billions on our hospital. Haven’t heard anything since. It would only take an access road from Takitimu Drive across to 17th Ave to transform access to the hospital. So… leave our green spaces alone. There must be heaps of flood plains for government to build houses on. Shadow1.
Pot calls kettle black...
Posted on 05-04-2023 18:52 | By morepork
Buddy Mikaere is involved with Racing AND with the interests of the hapu who originally had the land confiscated. Buddy has clarified his position (he sees his responsibility to the hapu as primary) and (like most of the community) supports Option C. But then Queen Anne dismisses his input on the grounds of "conflict of interest". As if there were no "conflicts of interest" on the part of the Commission in deciding what projects would be pursued with our money. I'd trust Buddy to be honest, long before I'd trust this Commission. I hope that if anything other than Option C is ratified, Buddy DOES push for the return of the land to the Hapu. I'd rather see it in their hands than being used in a manner contrary to the wishes of the community.
@Let's get real
Posted on 05-04-2023 19:10 | By morepork
Most people are sympathetic to your arguments; we know the Hospital is constrained and we know there is a problem with homelessness. I like a day at the races, although I haven't played golf for decades. But there are many families and individuals who derive great pleasure from these activities, and the fact that green space is reserved for them is something that enhances the beauty of our City. "Man does not live by bread alone." We NEED spaces like this that are publicly accessible, to nurture our well-being. Grace Hospital provided a fantastic facility, which is easily expandable, by selecting a rural location. Extensions to Tauranga hospital (maybe by Department) could do the same. The homeless are ALWAYS going to be with us even if you built the entire Racecourse site with high density State housing; that also probably requires a more rural setting.
SORRY folks
Posted on 05-04-2023 23:04 | By The Caveman
But under "Queen Anne" and her LABOUR appointed mates, its a DONE DEAL. The golf club and racecourse are "gone bergers" It will be carved up for iwi housing !!
Still ridiculous
Posted on 06-04-2023 10:11 | By Let's get real
I have been criticised for daring to place the health and well-being of the entire population of the Bay of Plenty above the trivial dalliances of a handful of people who seem to believe that a fenced-off site is accessible public land. Tell me how many can afford over a thousand dollars to be a member of a club of any kind. Delusional thinking is keeping people living in third world conditions and being kept in hospital corridors or the Emergency department because there are no available beds. What happens as the "boomers" age and require more "Public" (not private) hospital treatment which may be exacerbated by poor quality housing. But, I'm all right Jack... I'm financially secure, fit and healthy and I can walk (but more likely drive) to get my jollies. Delusional thinking based on personal circumstances.
@Let's get real
Posted on 06-04-2023 14:20 | By morepork
Your rebuttal ("Still Ridiculous") is not entirely fair. My post to you was not critical of you; I acknowledged that most people share your concerns regarding the Hospital and Homelessness. We simply diverge in HOW to address these things. I'm not one of the elite you condemn and I think if you actually went to a Race meeting, you could see for yourself that the people who attend are far from being the "upper privileged crust". On the grass, it is often families picnicking in the sun. Even in the stands, it is very ordinary Kiwis having a flutter and a day out. It is a beautiful green space and I can understand and condone people wanting it to stay that way. That doesn't mean I criticise you or your right to a view on this. Neither does it mean that Option C supporters are wrong or uncaring.
Really...
Posted on 06-04-2023 17:52 | By FromHere
Interested to hear arguments re putting Hospital there... the Hospital currently has almost all land between 17-21st Ave, much of which is empty, or has old, obsolete buildings that they are desperately trying to keep going, as there is no money to build new purpose built facility. Much of 20th ave block is bare land. More and more Departments are being housed in privately owned leased buildings - so - tell me, where is Hospital going to get the money to build a whole new facility??
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.