A Western Bay of Plenty councillor's comments about the council's relationship with Māori have been labelled 'mischievous” by a senior staff member.
Councillor Margaret Murray-Benge raised her concerns about the word ‘prioritise' in the council's 12 page, long-term plan preparation document during the Annual Plan and Long Term Plan Committee Meeting on Tuesday.
The draft Strategic Assumptions for the 2024-2034 Long Term Plan document helps with preparing the Western Bay of Plenty District Council's 10 year plan.
The assumption stated: 'Council seeks to prioritise and build upon the key relationship with Māori which is important to deliver on council's strategic direction and Long Term Plan.”
Murray-Benge said: 'It's true we do work closely with Māori and that's important, but partnership with Māori will continue to increase [in] importance.
'I just say it cannot go over our commitment to the wider community, it can't prioritise over anybody else because the Treaty [of Waitangi] when you read it doesn't say that.”
'To move into so called partnership just doesn't add up because it's not in the treaty and I just think that we are being quietly misled and I'm just sending a signal that I think this quite wrong,” she said.
Deputy mayor John Scrimgeour. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.
Committee chairperson and deputy mayor John Scrimgeour interjected and said: 'You're entitled to your view but we do have a responsibility to work with all groups and tangata whenua is one of them.”
Murray-Benge replied: 'I didn't say that sir, it's giving priority to one particular section is not right because we do have a responsibility to everybody.”
General manager strategy and community Rachael Davie responded to Murray-Benge's remarks: 'Your comments are mischievous.
'The reference within the strategic assumptions doesn't purport to put relationships with tangata whenua ahead of relationships with community at large or any other stakeholder group it is simply recognising our statutory obligations and the status of the Treaty,” said Davie.
Murray-Benge 'I'm not trying to be mischievous, I'm trying to highlight the fact that I'm uncomfortable with where we seem to be heading.”
The councillor has previously raised her concerns about Māori representation on councils.
In 2021, she organised a meeting to oppose the introduction of Māori wards in Tauranga for the city council elections and 'stimulate debate” about the issue.
In a council meeting about Three Waters reform last year, she said the water services were 'being transferred over to these huge entities that are tribal dominated and it's just so undemocratic”.
Councillor Anne Henry. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.
During Tuesday's meeting, councillor Anne Henry said she was 'all for equity” and gave the definition of prioritise.
'Something given special attention to, the highest or the higher importance rank and privilege,” she said.
'I'm not disagreeing with the sentiments in there [the assumption] but could we use another word instead of prioritise please?”
Mayor James Denyer said he had suggested different wording during the long-term plan workshop.
'Changing that from ‘council seeks to prioritise and build upon the key relationships' to ‘council seeks to consciously build on the key relationships with Māori'.
'I just wonder if that would be a more appropriate way to highlight the fact that we do want to work closely with Māori, but without any connotation of putting above the community,” he said.
Murray-Benge said that was a 'good idea”.
The councillors agreed to change the wording and adopted the strategic assumptions.
Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air
12 comments
Well done Margaret.
Posted on 11-05-2023 17:54 | By myview
Great work done there Margaret to get the wording changed. Keep up the pressure for all sections of our community to be treated equally, many thanks,Roly.
Good on Councillor Murray-Benge
Posted on 11-05-2023 19:28 | By Bruja
There are a great many New Zealanders who are utterly tired of the endless priority given to Maori. Enough is enough is enough. It is so often so very very undemocratic.
Well done
Posted on 11-05-2023 22:13 | By Jimmyjoe
Good on her for standing up and standing for all of our community, seams to be getting more two sided by the day, c’mon NZ let’s move forward as one!
Good On Her
Posted on 12-05-2023 07:25 | By Thats Nice
Totally agree with Margaret Murray-Benge on this and good that she's saying so as others wouldn't dare.
Well done
Posted on 12-05-2023 08:15 | By Kancho
Completely agree with councillor Murray-Benge’s in this context good on her and totally disagree that to challenge the wording is mischievous. In fact General manager strategy and community Rachael Davie is being provocative and it's not her place to comment on councillors right to discuss and debate.
Congratulations, thank you - a good outcome.
Posted on 12-05-2023 10:38 | By Murray.Guy
Congratulations, thank you Cr Margaret Murray-Benge for having the courage to remain true to your values, to your role as an elected community representative. R, as so many do, to be intimidated and bullied by fellow elected members and/or staff that should know much better than to breach their code of conduct, an attempt to belittle and undermine the role of a democratically elected counselor. I look forward to reading a formal complaint to the CEO WBOPDC in regards the behavior of Rachel Davey. Chairperson, deputy mayor John Scrimgeour interjected, said: “You’re entitled to your view but we do have a responsibility to work with all groups and tangata whenua is one of them. ”Murray-Benge replied: “I didn’t say that sir, it’s giving priority to one particular section is not right because we do have a responsibility to everybody.” Staffer, Rachael Davie to Murray-Benge’s remarks: “Your comments are mischievous..."
She gets my vote.
Posted on 12-05-2023 13:28 | By morepork
Absolutely encouraging to know there are still people prepared to defend our Democracy and not be intimidated in doing so. The amended wording is far better and should be acceptable to all parties. The attempt to bully her by reference to the Treaty is a good example of how thinking is being subverted to use what the Government wants us to use (Co-governance etc.) and how Treaty definitions can be spun to advantage one section of the Community over all the others. As Cr. Murray-Benge rightly points out, the responsibility is to ALL the community and I'll be watching Ms Davie, who thinks that calling a straight shot is "mischievous". If it is (I don't think so...), then we NEED more "mischief" on Council.
Hmmm
Posted on 12-05-2023 14:14 | By Let's get real
It's always about the fine print, as any year one legal student will tell you. Changes to wording will NEVER change the process though. The squeaky wheel gets the grease and a fear of being labelled as racist are the tools being wielded more and more often by a small self-interested section of the community.
@get real
Posted on 12-05-2023 14:55 | By Kancho
I agree but at least Councillor Murray Benge made the point correctly so. What I don't get is unelected paid staff interjecting her opinion into a councillors debate and in fact trying to demean the Councillor with name calling. Shows us these bureaucrats true colours . She should be reprimanded
Margaret as usual
Posted on 12-05-2023 19:15 | By R. Bell
misuses words to attack Maori. All important issues attended to by Council are prioritised.The fact that the Treaty demands such attention does not place issues involving Maori above any others. Democracy in NZ is determined by and includes The Treaty of Waitangi. Margaret and her supporters can not change that fact.
No cogovernance for me.
Posted on 13-05-2023 21:05 | By Hester
I respect your strength and bravery for taking a stand for all people that live in NZ.
@Robin Bell
Posted on 15-05-2023 14:32 | By morepork
De-selecting Maori from specific prioritisation is NOT an attack on Maori, when the priority should be to the WHOLE community. There is NOTHING in the Treaty (I have combed it in Maori AND English... many times...) that says Maori are to be given priority for ANYTHING. There is no co-governance and Rangatiratanga is ceded to the Crown, with certain provisos (as specified in Article 2.) It is a fair deal for all concerned and it is only modern attempts to spin it, and the dismissal of it in some subsequent 19th and 20th century dealings with Maori that have caused problems. Reparations have and are being made (rightly) and it is now generally observed. However, a minority of self-serving academics are trying to create a mythical interpretation of it in order to serve their own agenda and advantage one sector of society over the rest. Murray-Benge called it.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.