10:27:41 Friday 11 April 2025

MNZ's Rena response probed

An independent review into Maritime New Zealand's handling of the grounding of the Rena will go ahead.

MNZ announced this morning an independent review into the grounding on Astrolabe Reef on October 5, 2011 will be conducted by former Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Simon Murdoch.


The Rena on Astrolabe Reef on October 3, 2012.

Stuff.co.nz also reports Simon was the director of the Government Security Communications Bureau in 2011 when Kim Dotcom was put under surveillance.

The review will examine the MNZ response to the Rena incident and establish the factors that contributed to, or limited, its effectiveness.

The review has been commissioned jointly by the Ministry of Transport (MOT) and Maritime New Zealand (MNZ), and will be overseen by MOT Chief Executive Martin Matthews, the Chair of MNZ, David Ledson, and the Director of MNZ, Keith Manch.

MNZ says the report will involve discussions with MNZ staff, and central and local government stakeholders and key agents involved in the response.

It will not involve public submissions and a public consultation document will not be produced but the final report will be made public.

MNZ Director Keith Manch says an independent review of such large scale incidents is standard practice for emergency response organisations.

'As an organisation, business units within MNZ have done a lot of thinking about the response to the Rena grounding.

'Now it is timely to get an independent view.

'There will be things that have been done very well, but inevitably there will be areas where things could have been done better and we can take lessons away from this incident.”

Keith says the review's focus is solely on MNZ's response to the incident.

He says the causes of the grounding have already been established in the criminal investigation that led to the prosecution of the master and second officer.

It is expected the independent review will be completed in the first quarter of 2013.

The review will cover the planning and preparedness; oil spill response; salvage oversight; MNZ response team actions; MNZ's investigation of the incident; administrative support functions that enabled the response activity; communications and community engagement.

In addition, the review will consider the effect on MNZ's business continuity and MNZ's ability to respond to a wider ranging major maritime incident (for instance: involving loss of life as well as oil spill and salvage).

The Transport Accident Investigation Commission is conducting a separate investigation into the grounding.

Reviewer Simon Murdoch retired from the public service in 2009. He was Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet from 1991-1998.

He spent most of his career at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade where he became Chief Executive Officer in 2002.

He has held diplomatic postings in Canberra and Washington, and has undertaken a number of reviews in the public sector, mostly in the fields of foreign affairs, security and emergency response and management.

3 comments

MNZ NOT UP TO THE MARK

Posted on 04-10-2012 12:40 | By PLONKER

They just could not hack it, were not ready, after years and years of prep the best time to remedy was missed when the ship had power on board and before that first storm hit.


EASY ANSWERS

Posted on 04-10-2012 13:25 | By PLONKER

Major changes needed, can not manage a mess from a glass box in Wellington. The real deal is AKL, TGA and maybe 1-2 other locations have in port and under the control of the Habour Master (a competent former sea experienced captain or similar) teh gear needed to deal with spills and so on, as AKL and TGA are close a set of gear can be spread between. Any small gear can be stored in 1-2 sites and air lifted to where needed, e.g. by the army and short notice as they have the air transports to do so. Problems all solved.


Going Off Half-Cocked?

Posted on 04-10-2012 13:54 | By Muz061

First we had the sight of the unfortunate woman who headed Maritime NZ at the time of the grounding. She looked like a war casualty whenever we saw her on the TV interviews. And Maritime NZ failed to give any confidence of their competence in the matter until she was replaced. IIt was later whispered to me that she was a political appointee from the days of Helen and had no maritime experience at all. Great in a shipping disaster! Now we have an appointee to clean up the Maritime NZ mess who may yet be facing plenty of fresh embarassment. And the the GCSB/Kim Dotcom/John Key/US Justice Department stoush will have very long legs, especially if, as I suspect, the US authorities arrogantly stick to their impossible to win stance. John Key has so far escaped appropriately strong attacks in parliament from a pathetic Shearer opposition. However there may be some chunks of flesh hanging off his rear soon. Mr Murdoch could find himself in very hot water indeed, even if it can't be proven he was personally involved in ordering the illegal activity of his organisation. Or is illegal spying no longer a serious matter in today's culture? Is it really smart to hire "the right guy for the job" if matters outside this task are likely to leave a lasting stench on the man? Really, the Rena disaster is one big tale of incompetence. The only organisation involved in any way that has come out smelling good is the Port of Tauranga.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.