Resident saddened by tree felling

A Greerton resident is disappointed a 52-year-old native Kauri tree on the property he grew up on has been cut down with the felled wood likely sold on Trade Me.

Noel Peterson woke up recently to find the 15 metre tall Kauri tree he planted with his parents in 1960 on the property he now lives next door to had been cut down with no warning.


Noel Peterson with a piece of the remaining Kauri tree.

'I grew up on the property where the tree was, my sister inherited that house when my mother passed away and sold the property which was then subdivided.”

'I live in the property next door and admired the tree every day from my kitchen window.”

Noel was seven-years-old when he planted the tree on the Pemberton Crescent property and is upset he was given no warning

'I'm quite disappointed with it all. Someone came past the other day and said ‘that tree is a landmark' and now it's gone.”

'It all comes down to Council changing the tree policy meaning people don't have to be notified when they chop down a tree.”

Tauranga City Council changed the protected tree list on July 27 this year, reducing the number of trees protected under council rules from 1879 to 339.

A TCC communications advisor Marcel Currin says unless the tree is protected under the City Plan the property owners can do what they like with the tree.

A full list of protected trees can be found here.


The Kauri tree that was planted in 1960 before it was cut down.

Noel says the property was previously purchased by Classic Builders, who built a new house on the property, and cut down a 52-year-old Rimu in the process, leaving the Kauri before on-selling the property.

'Now the property has been on-sold and the Kauri tree cut down which I thought was safe.”

Noel says the property was purchased a fortnight ago and he is unsure who the new home owners are as they are yet to move into the property.

Noel says there was no notification or warning the tree was going to be cut down.

'I got up and saw they had already cut it down no notification, the Rimu suffered the same fate.”

'I think it was a landmark tree and I would of liked to have seen it stay there for another 150 years, personally I feel a lifelong friend has been lost. I have no idea why they cut the tree down.”

The tree was removed by Tauranga Tree Services, who suggested to Noel's daughter that the wood may be sold on Trade Me.

Noel says he would have liked to have seen the wood donated to the Men's Shed in Historic Village.

'It seems it will just get flogged off on Trade Me.”

'It would have been good if the owners had donated the wood to the Men's Shed for wood turning, and there is still probably opportunity for them to do that, the wood would not have vanished into thin air, it was a truckload.”

2 comments

Noel needs to respect private property rights

Posted on 10-10-2012 09:20 | By Gee Really

What a complicated and confused world we would live in if people had rights to trees they planted on land that had now been sold to other people. To me it's unbelievable that Noel should now moan about the tree being cut down without notification to him. If trees on a property are so important the seller can put on a covenant protecting them as part of the sale. But no way I'd buy a property if I still had to kowtow to the previous owner.


GREENMAN

Posted on 19-10-2012 10:23 | By Green Wizard

Gee Really, I think you missed the main point of the article, putting aside Noel's feeling of personal loss you should perhaps look at the bigger picture. Mature trees which have taken many years to grow and will take many years to replace are being cut down at an alarming rate all over the city since the recent changes in the tree policy. Regardless of where they are planted be it on private or public land they are an integral part of the wellbeing of our city. We need better urban planning and building design so we live in harmony with the well established trees rather than open permission to cut them down as we wish. The recent changes to the tree policy that puts nearly all the mature trees in the city at risk of removal needs revoking and better protection for the trees reintroduced in a way similar to the policy we had for decades before this recent change. I think our forefathers had some foresight when the old tree policy was created, with better regard for trees, history, and community wellbeing, perhaps we should learn from this. A big thank you to Sunlive for drawing attention to this matter which is about the greater good and wellbeing for the whole community rather than for the benefit of a few individuals.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.