Generations to benefit from Tga’s civic precinct

An artist’s impression of the Te Manawataki o Te Papa library and community hub. Image: Supplied/TCC.

Ratepayers will likely fund their portion of Tauranga’s $306m civic precinct through a government levy.

The ratepayer contribution to the precinct named Te Manawataki O Te Papa is capped at $151.5m.

The public has expressed their preference to use an Infrastructure Funding and Financing (IFF) levy to fund this.

The levy would be paid via the rates bill over 30 years.

According the Tauranga City Council website the levy for a median value residential property is estimated to be $107-$128 for ratepayers and $368-$440 for commercial ratepayers. It was estimated to increase about 2 per cent a year, up to the cap.

Te Manawataki o Te Papa, meaning the heartbeat of Te Papa, will include a library and community hub, civic whare (public meeting house), exhibition gallery and museum.

It will be located on the site of the former council chambers and library, between Wharf Street and Hamilton Street in the city centre.

Upgrades to Baycourt and Tauranga Art Gallery, along with the landscaping of public spaces and improving Masonic Park will also be part of the project.

Tauranga City Council called for submissions in September on whether to use the levy or fund it through a rate funded loan.

Of the 301 submissions received, 189 supported using the levy, 84 did not want to use the levy and 28 didn’t provide a response to the option choice.

The commission decided to proceed with the levy option at a council meeting on Monday, but will not make the final decision until March 2024 when the IFF levy proposal has been developed.

Commission chair Anne Tolley said two or three generations will benefit from the civic precinct to should be paying for it.  Photo: Alisha Evans/SunLive.

Commission chair Anne Tolley said this was a sensible approach.

“It’s good that we're not committing to a deal here. We want to see the whites of the eyes … on what that deal looks like before we make the final decision.

“We still want to make sure that it's a good deal for the ratepayers.”

The intergenerational nature of the project came through in submissions, said Tolley.

“This is a big project and two, possibly three generations will enjoy the benefit of it and should be contributing to the payment.

“I was really heartened by the number of submissions that understood that.”

Around 36 percent of submitters didn’t support the project. The reasons included the affordability for ratepayers and the council, and a preference for the council to fund other priorities in the city.

An artist’s render of the $306.3m civic precinct Te Manawataki o Te Papa. Image: Supplied/TCC.

Tolley said these were “some of the same old naysayers who don’t want to spend any money”.

“[They’re] quite happy to let centre city die and look like something out of a Western movie, with the tumbleweed tumbling down through the main street.

“I do recognise some of the points that submitters made about debt, and the visibility of debt.”

They needed to be transparent that the levy was debt, said Tolley.

One of the problems for local government was a large percentage of debt was tied up in paying for or underwriting growth, she said.

That restricted council’s ability to fund other things in the community, said Tolley.

“Local government is severely constrained by that.”

The council will inform the submitters about Monday’s progress before making the final decision in March next year.

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.

17 comments

Other people's money

Posted on 07-11-2023 17:08 | By Jules L

“This is a big project and two, possibly three generations will enjoy the benefit of it and should be contributing to the payment."

That is typical doublespeak for: "It's going to put the next several generations in debt". But hey, what do the commissioners care, it's ratepayer's money, not theirs, and they just love spending other people's money.

The people said loud and clear that they did not want a museum, so the commission actually had the nerve to say: "we heard what you said, so we are building a museum". It's amazing what you can get away with when you are a non-elected dictatorship.


Transparency. Has no meaning for Mahuta's Commission.

Posted on 07-11-2023 17:14 | By morepork

"The public has expressed their preference to use an Infrastructure Funding and Financing (IFF) levy to fund this." Really? I'm part of the public and nobody asked me. Queen Anne says that 36% of "submissions" were against the project, but dismisses this as being "the usual naysayers who don't want to spend any money". Most of us are not against spending money for projects we actually want, it is the action of having "what we want" decided for us, that is annoying. The Commission's agenda is usually NOT the community's agenda (or priority). If 36% opposed, wouldn't that be grounds for a public discussion and a referendum? How do we audit these "submissions"? For all we know, the Commission could have got a bunch of their mates to make positive submissions, skewing the result. $350 million of OUR money, is something we should have voted on.


White Elephant

Posted on 07-11-2023 17:29 | By Fernhill22

This is the big White Elephant that Tauranga ratepayers will be paying off for years.
We are currently in an economic downturn, a cost-of-living crisis, and a high interest rate environment yet the commissioners are happy to spend $300m on a project that delivers no return on investment. What ratepayers actually want is a review of costs in council to save millions of dollars, reviewing commissioner's salaries, reviews of projects being completed to see whether ratepayers received value for money vs time taken (I.e. contractors used for the debacle which is Cameron Road) and the funds of $300m to be reallocated towards the things that people want fixed like the city's roading infrastructure & housing to start off with. There is no point spending $300m on something that no-one wants, where there's no available parking & no retail/ hospitality businesses left.


Democracy: The difference between a request for submissions and an actual referendum.

Posted on 07-11-2023 17:39 | By morepork

If you are an administrator and you have an agenda (or a particular project that involves spending large sums of Other People's Money), you might seek to justify it by requesting "submissions" which are ostensibly "from the public". Obviously, any of your cronies who stand to gain by getting contracts for contributing to it, will be very happy to provide favourable submissions. In other words, vested interests, and vehemently opposed would (probably) submit. But, if you were truly interested in honest community service, you would organize a referendum, based on the register of Ratepayers (it is their money). This will provide an "across the board (including "lukewarmers")" response, which will be a much fairer, unbiased, description of how people REALLY feel about your project. Of course, if you KNOW that such a referendum is unlikely to give you the result you want, you won't let people vote...


Lovely Pictures

Posted on 07-11-2023 17:45 | By Yadick

Can the artist give us another impression? One that shows where all those people parked. Perhaps they all caught a bus or arrived on e-scooters . . .


Over a third of ALL submissions

Posted on 07-11-2023 18:24 | By Let's get real

Have been dismissed out of hand as "The same old naysayers".... Good job this harriden and her cronies don't need to put their names forward for re-election, because the "Same old naysayers" would call them out for what they are... UNELECTED PARASITES on the ratepayers dollar. There are people struggling out there... presumably they are also "THE SAME OLD NAYSAYERS"....


How very convenient

Posted on 07-11-2023 22:30 | By Naysay

Your spending over $150 million but bet it will be more based on 301 submissions that actually thought it was perfect fine to incur more debt off the books ? To allow you to incur more debt for ratepayers in this times of incredible hardship. Totally irresponsible yet again.


Stupidity

Posted on 07-11-2023 22:52 | By Yadick

I fully believe this will be generational. There will be debt for generations to come and the Commissioners can go to their grave knowing fully that they have caused this.
START LISTENING. It's fine to hear but START LISTENING. It's a learned concept.


Dribble

Posted on 08-11-2023 10:15 | By Accountable

How will this new Civic center create the visitor numbers required to revitalize the CBD? There really isn't anything new apart from the new community center. There has always been a library, Art gallery and Council services in that area. The Commissioners are the highest paid dribblers in the Bay of Plenty and if we were all paid to lie like they do the country would be run by the Mafia or maybe that's exactly how the Council is being run at present. One lie after another and they need 1100 staff to help them remember what was said and when to avoid tripping themselves up.


The Master

Posted on 08-11-2023 13:16 | By Ian Stevenson

Tolley & Co say that the ratepayers debt is capped at $151.5m? That being via the IFF?

Then perhaps the IFF should be looked at as "Debt", there are a few problems with all this:-
1 There is no way possible that it will all cost $300m or so, nothing TCC does is on budget. Nothing TCC does ever achieves what it is meant to either. PS that is a positive comment!!! No contractor, of sound mind, would quote anything for this huge mess, the ground is prone to liquefaction, so how to quote? It
2 The problem for ratepayers, is that the IFF debt will get paid in 30 years... the rest of TCC's huge debt will not.
3 What about the huge annual losses? Who is paying all that? That will be perhaps $60-70m annually, It was estuary how to quote on that?


The Master

Posted on 08-11-2023 13:19 | By Ian Stevenson

The commissioners are 100% dreamers!

Debt that is not debt?

$300m odd, really, no chance of that, the real numbers are looking more like $450-500m already and that is before TCC messes it up some more, just like the Harrington carpark building.


Very angry

Posted on 08-11-2023 22:12 | By nerak

with these looseheads running this city into the ground. What a nerve Tolley has, talking about naysayers. $1800 every damn time her butt hits the chair. While ratepayers not well endowed, and there are many, go to bed wondering how the hell they will pay the next rates bill, they already went without to pay the last one. There are those reliant solely on a pension Tolley, I wish you would give them a thought before you spout your nonsense ad nauseum. The sooner you and your cohorts are gone, the happier many in this town will be. Noticeable your smarmy smile has gone - are you beginning to get the message you are not popular?


You say 'naysayers' yet we are the 'bill payers'

Posted on 08-11-2023 22:25 | By Omni

How long to we have to put up with these un-elected few, leaching off our rates to line their own fat stuffed pockets with our hard earned cash, then have the balls to decide to spend more $ on something the majority of of locals neither want nor need. An overpriced Museum is not going to fix Tauranga or the wider communities problems. This is something these commissioners have decided will leave a legacy for themselves! Fix our roads and streets, help make our community safer and more affordable (that means decreasing rates!!!) and do something practical to help reduce homelessness, graffiti & tagging and the appalling ever increasing rubbish tip (literally rubbish everywhere, beaches, roadsides - even in the new gardens on Cameron Road) that we call our backyard. If you want to fix town make it free parking and affordable to run a business...


Entertaining

Posted on 09-11-2023 08:44 | By Inmediasres

I find it entertaining to read the uninformed dribble that people comment on these articles....


Another tax for 30 years

Posted on 10-11-2023 11:10 | By an_alias

You think the road tolls and govt levy will ever be removed ?
Once they are on they are never removed.
Look at fuel taxes, we still have them for WW2.
So the real question is how this is legal when the council has gone beyond there rating limits ?
You want to see a region sucked dry and wonder why the people leave to Oz ?


Ridiculous

Posted on 11-11-2023 18:01 | By Toddy

Don't forget that this building does not include the Council offices, this will be in the new Wooden wonder in Devonport Rd.
So the overall spend could be double or way more millions of dollars, for Council infrastructure.
Also the Art gallery is closed & being renovated & expanded.

Yet other projects are not completed......


Three generations ?

Posted on 25-11-2023 15:06 | By Naysay

My next generation will not be here Anne . No future for Tauranga it's an absolute disaster.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.