Western BOP pushes ahead with water fluoridation

Two of Western Bay Of Plenty's water supplies must to be fluoridated by July 2025. File photo.


Western Bay of Plenty District council will push ahead with fluoridate plans despite a High Court ruling that the national directive was unlawful.

The preliminary High Court decision says then director-general of health Sir Ashley Bloomfield's July 2022 fluoridation directive to Western Bay and 13 other councils failed to consider the Bill of Rights Act.

Mayor James Denyer said the judgment has not quashed the directive so the council would obey the law. Plans for the required infrastructure for fluoridation were still in place.

“Council is maintaining a watching brief on legal developments.”

The council failed to get an exemption from the directive to fluoridate two of its eight water supplies, all of which are not fluoridated. 

The ministry issued a directive to fluoridate the Athenree and Wharawhara water supplies by July 31, 2025.

The water supplies cover Waihī Beach, Athenree, Tanners Point, Katikati and the reticulated rural area through to Morton Road.

At the time, Director-General of Health Dr Diana Sarfati said she was not able to grant an exemption.

"It would be inappropriate to revoke or amend the direction to fluoridate provided to Western Bay of Plenty District Council.

“The World Health Organization and other international health authorities have endorsed community water fluoridation as an effective health measure for the prevention of dental decay. Extensive research carried out around the world, including in Aotearoa New Zealand, has established that water fluoridation is safe and effective,” said Sarfati.

People against fluoridation sported signs at the Waihī Beach Community Board. Photo: Alisha Evans/SunLive. 

The council sought the exemption after public consultation from the annual plan showed the community had concerns about fluoridation. The councillors voted 10 in favour with two against. 

Fluoride Free NZ members and supporters spoke in public forums at council meetings and community boards, urging the council to seek an injunction from the directive.

Councillor Anne Henry said she was happy with the High Court ruling.

“Give people the choice to take it [fluoride], don't put it in our water.”

Henry says people had the option of taking fluoride tablets or using fluoride toothpaste.

Councillor Don Thwaites voted against seeking an exemption but says he was not strongly for or against fluoridation, and he supported staff to do what the law required.

“This recent judgment wasn't about the health merits of fluoridation It was more of a procedural thing.”

Councillor Don Thwaites said he was not strongly for or against fluoridation. Photo: John Borren/SunLive. 

Council director water services EJ Wentzel confirmed: “The judgement hasn’t quashed the direction to fluoridate, so we will continue to proceed unless instructed otherwise by the Ministry of Health.

“If we stop planning now, it will be difficult to meet the prescribed timelines.”

The cost of introducing fluoride to the Athenree supply would be $923,962 with the ongoing management and monitoring estimated to be $55,148 per annum.
For the Wharawhara supply the setup cost would be $938,587 with ongoing costs estimated at $55,193 each year.

The ministry would fund the cost of setting up the fluoridation infrastructure but not the ongoing costs.

The council faced fines if it did not comply.

Non-compliance could result in a fine up to $200,000 and, if the non-compliance is ongoing, there could be a fine of $10,000 a day.

A Ministry of Health spokesperson says the High Court decision relates to the process required to be used in deciding to issue a direction.

“The judgment is not about the public health merits of fluoridation, or whether fluoridation can be justified under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. 

“The court has not quashed the directions, and at this time the directions remain in force.”

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.

You may also like....


Time to listen to voters

Posted on 24-11-2023 16:41 | By Angels

When are we going to get responsible government listening to the people. This is crazy.
Councils need to be held accountable to the voters and their wishes.


Posted on 25-11-2023 13:00 | By morepork

I fiercely support democracy and the rights of people to vote on controvesial issues. This looks like a case where the Council's hands are tied by a directive from Government, which, in retrospect, did not consider the rights of the people. There are extreme positions on both sides of the Floridation argument and some people feel passionately about it. (If you have ever seen kids teeth in unfloridated areas, compared to floridated, it can be persuasive.) I favour it, but I think the democratic process is more important, and I agree with you that Council should be answerable. The best course here would be a local referendum that is legally binding. That means that Council ARE answering to the people and, whatever the outcome, at least objections would be registered with "NO" votes.

It's a poison!!!

Posted on 25-11-2023 14:05 | By Watchdog

And once again the Ratepayers will be paying $1,000,000 for the imposition of having Fluoride in their water. No referendum. This is Labour's draconian idea.
I am off to buy a water filter so in the end I have to pay twice! Because I do NOT want fluoride in my water (apart from natural occurring fluoride).

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to make a comment.