Enabling a new housing development in Tauranga’s east is “absolutely critical” to plug the city's shortfall of homes.
With a shortage of 5000 homes, the Tauranga City Commission wants land rezoned as quickly as possible for the Te Tumu development at the eastern end of Pāpāmoa.
But the large greenfield project has been beset by delays and still appears years away from development.
At a meeting on Monday, the commission issued Tauranga City Council staff a deadline of early 2026 to get the 760 hectares of land rezoned, despite the challenges.
Commission chair Anne Tolley said there were complex issues to resolve.
"But we need to get on and do it as fast as we possibly can because we’re 5000 houses short,” she said.
“There's a whole number of reasons why this is absolutely critical.”
A report showed the area would be the safest in Pāpāmoa in a tsunami, Te Tumu would also provide homes for 15,500 people. It has been identified as a priority urban growth area.
Commission chair Anne Tolley said the city was short 5000 homes. Photo: Alisha Evans/SunLive.
“Let's get more resources and get on with it … when the city is crying out for housing,” said Tolley.
“We've [the commission] been here almost three years and we are still talking these long timelines and lack of resources.
“I'm getting really frustrated.”
The council had a “better chance” with the change of government and its signals around the national policy statement on freshwater, said Tolley.
Work to rezone Te Tumu for urban development began in 2017 with a goal of housing development by 2021, according to council city planning and growth manager Andy Mead’s report to council.
Delays plagued the project, including divergent aspirations among Māori landowners, differing opinions from iwi, and changes in national policy, especially freshwater management, the report said.
Housing was unlikely to be delivered in Te Tumu until 2040, once land development and civil works timeframes were considered, it said.
This was because of fiscal challenges and the Kaituna Overflow stormwater management project being “critical” to the development of Te Tumu. However, it's not due for completion until after 2034, Mead’s report said.
Commissioner Stephen Selwood said the council could partner with central government to fund the infrastructure needed. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.
Commissioner Stephen Selwood said the priority is filling the existing housing gap, which grows "bigger by the day”.
Te Tumu could address that housing gap, said Selwood.
One of the issues was funding the infrastructure and Selwood suggested the council could partner with central government.
Tolley said an infrastructure funding and financing (IFF) levy was also an option for funding the required works.
An IFF levy is a government loan that is paid back through council rates over a fixed period.
Tolley said housing could be built before 2040 if the council could find another way to fund the infrastructure.
Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston said landowners were really concerned by council resiling from funding the infrastructure.
But the council wasn’t resiling from the planning, he said.
“We do need to find faster and better ways to deliver the plan change.”
Commissioner Shadrach Rolleston said land owners had been working with council on this since 2004. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.
The landowners had been working with the council since 2004 and wanted the plan change to be initiated, said Rolleston.
“Twenty years is a long time.”
The parcels of land that make up Te Tumu are owned by the Te Tumu Kaituna 14 Trust, three other trusts, Catalyst (Highrise) Ltd, Ford Land Holdings, Tauranga City Council and Western Bay of Plenty District Council.
Finding a balance between housing supply and protecting the environment was also important, said Rolleston.
“While there may be constraints when it comes to housing, we still value water, we still value the importance of protecting and looking after the environment and our biodiversity.
“From an environmental point of view and biodiversity point of view we have lost a lot,” he said.
“If we can find a way to deliver on outcomes for the environment with housing that would be our ideal scenario.”
The work done by staff around the wetlands was a great example of finding a balance, said Rolleston.
In giving staff a deadline for rezoning Te Tumu, Tolley said there were elements outside the council’s control - but a lot of other aspects they could control.
Council staff will provide regular updates to council on the Te Tumu works.
Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air.
7 comments
NZ’s Largest Cul-de-sac
Posted on 12-12-2023 07:03 | By Johnney
Why don't the council focus more on high rise developments instead of creating further urban sprawl. More inner city Tauranga development might actually save the CBD.
Ridiculous number
Posted on 12-12-2023 07:20 | By Andrew64
Where does 5000 houses short come from? Rather than encouraging people to come to Tauranga we should be discouraging them at least until the infrastructure is in place to support them. That is a long way off. In the meantime put up the FULL sign. If you can afford a house in Tauranga there are plenty of houses for sale. If you can't I've heard Gore is quite nice.
Move on
Posted on 12-12-2023 09:12 | By Fernhill22
Let's forget about pursuing a lost cause that is going nowhere fast (17 years away) & costing ratepayers millions of dollars fighting a battle that they can't win. This project has been going through the high courts for years and going absolutely nowhere. There must be other alternatives rather than TCC banking on two projects (Tauriko West & Te Tumu) that aren't going to be happening anytime soon.
Take a look on google maps and look at the vast amount of farmland between Papamoa & Te Puke that could potentially be utilised as another option, there's underutilised land on Mataphi that could be opened up for housing as well. TCC need a shakeup from top to bottom, bringing in external project managers, who can get sh*t done, both on time & within budget.
NOT practable
Posted on 12-12-2023 13:40 | By CliffK
Congested roads, no parking, water restrictions, and our smart commisioners want to make it worse. DO NOT expect current home owners to fund your dreams, we value our life style. If we wanted to live like Aucklanders we would move there.. There are houses for sale in Tauranga and surrounds. They don't get any cheaper out in Papamoa, but the cost of transport to work does, Oh and they are talking a congestion charge which will impact workers trying to get to there work. I do not know what planet , our precious Ann and her team came from, but I wish they would go back there.
Hang on a minute…
Posted on 12-12-2023 13:59 | By Shadow1
I thought Te Tumu was a dead duck after some of the local owners refused to sign it off! Have they been bought out? TCC have been named as having a financial interest in the subdivision which is only the case because they bought the interest of a local developer 20 odd years ago. The developer had until this year to buy it back. The fact that they haven’t yet tells me it’s a long way from being a done deal. My question is, “do we need another 5000 houses in Tauranga?” As we know, growth doesn’t pay for growth, and ratepayers have more than enough on their plates already.
Shadow1.
WARNING
Posted on 12-12-2023 22:12 | By hexsayer
If this is that strip of land you look at across from the Maketu side of the Kaituna Cut, thats a pretty terrible idea. Whether you believe in the paranormal or not thats not a place people last long in. I've heard tale of people in groups attemping to set up weekend camps to fish Papamoa side of the cut, and 'something' didnt want them there. Well long hearsay account of someone elses firsthand account short from someone that doesnt pull legs, they didnt last the weekend, they seemingly ended up breaking down mentally. Not just one, all of them. Whether it was the night they got there or the next morning they couldnt leave fast enough. Tbh I dont like even looking at the place for too long because of the "vibes".
Would not recommend.
Infrastructure
Posted on 13-12-2023 15:58 | By Kancho
Council already fails providing sufficient infrastructure for existing city. Yet growth before infrastructure is very much encouraged. Water is always an issue but this most fundamental requirement isn't met. We have plenty of rain but little storage so every year we are lectured about saving water as we watch our hard work in the garden die. Just one issue amongst others where they fail , and yet spend spend spend. Talk of stadiums yet stadiums mostly never break even and become a liability
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.