Menstruation and the no toilet during class rule

Inglewood High School's decision to prevent students from going to the bathroom during class has caused an uproar. Photo / Alyssa Smith.

A dad has pulled his teenage daughter out of her Taranaki high school over its policy stopping students from going to the bathroom during class, which he claims caused a menstruating student to bleed through her clothing.

The small regional town of Inglewood has erupted into fury over the local high school’s decision to curb toilet visits and a period expert is enraged at the “lack of education” around menstruation.

However, Inglewood High School’s principal says it is trying to combat vandalism and vaping in its bathrooms and stands by the bathroom restrictions.

Inglewood dad Alex Cowling, whose 14-year-old daughter attends the school, claimed the new policy infringed on his daughter’s right to privacy and could impact her health.

“They have to provide a bathroom and free access to it ... they have the right to privacy so they don’t have to tell them why they’re going to the toilet.”

Alex says he had complained to the school principal, its board of trustees and the Ministry of Education and plans to raise the issue with the Teacher’s Council.

Alex's daughter Bella told the Herald she understood why the school had the policy in place to stamp out vaping but says the entire school should not be punished for the actions of a few students.

“This has already gotten to a point where a girl has bled through her clothing and has to sit in it as a teacher told her to hold it and that she could wait. This student was mortified.

“I am sick of this treatment and all of my friends are as well.”

Alex called the rule a “blatant unlawful misuse of power” and worried students may suffer adverse health effects, such as toxic shock syndrome and UTIs.

Alex also says it put students at risk of being ridiculed by their peers.

“I usually stay out of school politics, but when they start [infringing] on my daughter’s right with such flimsy excuses, that’s when I have something to say.

“I’ve got to advocate for my kids because no one else is going to.”

A petition has been started to make the school retract its new policy.

Principal Rosey Mabin told the Herald the incident where a student bled through her clothes had not been reported to the school so she could not confirm it.

Rosey supplied a statement she had sent to parents explaining the new policy was to curb vandalism and vaping in the bathrooms.

Rosey also says they would look at trialling digital leave passes in the future.

Board of trustees chairman Mel Cook says he fully supported the principal and senior leadership team in their decision.

Jocelyn Mikaere, deputy secretary for the Ministry of Education’s Central office, says schools should take responsibility for their policies and procedures.

“School boards are free to make school rules on a wide range of matters, however, we expect them to consult with their parent community before making any decisions.”

Mikaere encouraged the parents to raise the issue directly with the school.

Danika Revell, chief executive and co-founder of the Period Place, says the policy made her “viscerally angry”.

She sympathised with the issues the school is trying to prevent but the rule highlighted a lack of menstrual health education.

“Would a teacher say to a student who is vomiting or has diarrhoea that they can’t go to the toilet? Because if the answer is ‘no’, then why can’t a menstruating student go to the toilet? It’s not like you can just squeeze it and hold it in until break time.”

-NZ Herald

1 comment

Lack of imagination.

Posted on 04-08-2024 12:18 | By morepork

Why is it so common to see issues being addressed by a marked lack of imagination and insight, not just in this school, but in SO many institutions? It frequently seems to be a strategy of adopting the obvious "brute force" approach.
1. School has a problem with vaping.
2, Kids will take off to vape in the toilets during class.
SOLUTION: Stop kids going to the toilet. (!!?)
NOBODY in authority thought this might NOT be a good solution. The article relates just some of the implications, and they are shameful.
A more promising solution could be to patrol the toilets to deter and check if kids are vaping. Random spot checks by school service staff. No need for demeaning school and students by attempting a blatantly non-viable solution which leads to publicized outrage. The school holding their ground is pathetic


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.