Councillor calls for inquiry into commission

Pāpāmoa ward councillor Steve Morris said the commission's tenure was “an interesting time" in Tauranga's history. Photo / Alisha Evans

A Tauranga councillor who was among those replaced by the commission has called for an independent inquiry into the decisions and transparency during their tenure.

Councillor Steve Morris tried to gain support from the elected council for staff to provide options for an independent inquiry into the Government-appointed commission’s governance, decisions and transparency.

Mayor Mahé Drysdale said while it was “frustrating” to deal with past decisions, “stringing the commissioners up” would not help the current council move forward.

Tauranga’s council, elected in 2019, was replaced in 2021 by the four-person commission that led the city until the local election in July 2024.

Morris' push for an inquiry into the commission happened while the council was discussing the results of the second wave of its annual residents’ survey at a meeting on Monday.

The latest results showed 29% of respondents were happy with the council’s overall image and reputation. The image and reputation score for 2023/24 was 26% satisfied.

An artist's impression of the $306m civic precinct Te Manawataki o Te Papa, a project started by the commission. Image: Tauranga City Council.

Morris said improvements in the survey were pleasing but it was compared to “an interesting time in the city’s governance history” when the commission was in charge.

He said the results showed the council was yet to “clearly define the stop and start” of the four-person commission led by Anne Tolley.

“We are still to this day dealing … with decisions that were made for which this governing body has no control over. As long as that is the case, that’s going to affect our reputation.”

Morris was a member of the council elected in 2019 that was discharged of its duties because of dysfunction and governance issues.

Decisions made by the commission included building a $306m civic precinct in Tauranga CBD, adding a $5m playground to the Tauranga waterfront alongside other upgrades, building a costal pathway in Mount Maunganui, and the decision to sell the Marine Precinct for $13.98m, which is on hold pending a High Court judicial review.

Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale. Photo / David Hall
Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale. Photo / David Hall

Drysdale said the new council was “very different to the commissioners” and public perception of the council would change as it led with “positive action”.

“I see this as a bit of a waste of money because it’s not going to change anything that we do as a council.”

Councillor Kevin Schuler said the commission had a mandate and came in for a reason.

Instead of spending time talking about decisions the commission made, Schuler said he would rather the council started doing things “our way”.

“I really want us to have faith in what we will do as a council and back ourselves over our term.”

He pointed out satisfaction with the council’s overall performance had risen to 44% compared with 34% for the year prior.

Councillor Rick Curach, who also served on the council from 2001 to 2019, said the commissioners were appointed “to get stuff done and move the city forward”.

Morris said Curach needed to read the terms of reference set for the commission not the “propaganda claims”.

Welcome Bay Councillor Hautapu Baker. Photo / David Hall
Welcome Bay Councillor Hautapu Baker. Photo / David Hall

Councillor Hautapu Baker found the terms of reference online so he “wasn’t buying into this quote unquote propaganda”.

He said while there were things that “weren’t perfect”, the commission consulted and made decisions that were informed by the community.

“Whether you think that’s good or not is entirely subjective.

“Any governance position, role or team inherent decisions good or bad by previous leadership, and you’ve got to deal with the hand in front of you.”

A 2020 independent review into the 2019 council said the council was also facing substantial infrastructure and funding challenges.

The commission was given the authority to perform the same functions and duties of an elected council, according to the terms of reference.

Morris' motion was voted down. He and councillor Glen Crowther were in support. The seven other councillors voted against it.

What is the annual residents' survey?

Each year Tauranga City Council asks about 600 residents their thoughts on its services and initiatives.

Key Research conducts the surveys and questions about 150 people four times a year. Each survey is called a wave.

Results from this wave included:

  • 44% of people were satisfied with the council’s overall performance.
  • Overall value for money dropped by 3% with 29% satisfied.
  • 29% of people were satisfied with the council’s overall image and reputation.
  • Overall satisfaction with roads and footpaths increased by 15%.
  • Overall satisfaction in outdoor spaces increased by 6%.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

12 comments

Are you joking ?

Posted on 13-03-2025 08:10 | By an_alias

You reference a research poll carried out by the council WHO got everything they wanted done out of the commissioners ?
You think that is actually a reflection of what people think ?
How about we have an independent inquiry about the legality of appointing them in the first place without election. How about we then get transparency about all the back room deals they clearly did and have that open to the public view. Then see your "oh they did a great job".
Mahe if they have nothing to hide WHY BLOCK IT ?


Why block it Mahe

Posted on 13-03-2025 08:12 | By an_alias

If ALL of the council operations and commissioner activity was above board WHAT DO YOU HAVE TO HIDE ?
You want confidence in council how about being open to the public what they and you do ?


No accountability

Posted on 13-03-2025 08:36 | By bigted

The present council is copping-out. In the real world you an I live in we are made to be accountable for our actions. The previous commissioners were paid by us, and have a responsibility to us, both legally and morally.

For present council to say all is OK is, in fact, burying one's head in the sand. Their own figures show us that only 1 in 3 of us is happy.

If Tauranga council were a bona fide business they would have bent tipped into receivership years ago!


Good idea, waste of money

Posted on 13-03-2025 09:03 | By The Sage

Why waste more money on these Commissioners? They have already spent enough and cost the tax payer. Let’s move on. It won’t change anything.


Hmmm

Posted on 13-03-2025 10:06 | By Let's get real

I think that the "advice" given to the mayor and other councillors by the council executive, might be coloured by a desire to conceal previous actions and activities from within their offices.
Unfortunately, as we all know, enquiries into government departments and organisations are generally stonewalled and result in the usual political jargon with no outcome.
What is glaringly obvious is that the gang of four, demolition team, are unsurprisingly silent on all matters that they pontificated upon. Are we still seeing their influence in the city planning office..? My guess is that the backdoor into council offices is still flapping in the wind and we will never know the truth behind the spending of public funds by certain individuals.
So keep evading the truth Mr Mayor and continue to distance yourself, you've only got a few more years to go.


Frozen 3

Posted on 13-03-2025 10:24 | By Ghost

Steve mate, take a leaf from Elsa's page and "Let it go"


Mandated

Posted on 13-03-2025 12:48 | By Kancho

Councillor Kevin Schuler said the commission had a mandate and came in for a reason
Well to me mandate means authority to act but in my mind means by the people, the ratepayers whose money it is. So we see our elected council hamstrung . An enquiry should be held and decisions made challenged and especially the staff bureaucracy that played a hand in the backroom . A restructure of said bureaucracy is in councillors hands to tighten expenditure and better control


The Master

Posted on 13-03-2025 14:17 | By Ian Stevenson

@ Let's get real

Previously its reported formerly that an investigation of TCC found and verified that TCC was "Negligent and exceeded statutory authority".

You can have one guess who then has decided not to release that report to the Councilors or the public. TCC staff.

So if you think that Mahe and Co would support more of that, then yeah "Get real". Hell no, what does that tell you about accountability, transparency of TCC staff and of course Mahe & Co?


Move on

Posted on 13-03-2025 14:49 | By Solo

Steve is wasting time and money. Move on. Tauranga needs to grow up.


The Master

Posted on 13-03-2025 14:57 | By Ian Stevenson

@ Ghost

That is a little naive...

The Commissioners have set in motion a huge mess, some of that can be seen already e.g. Debt has doubled from around $600m to over $1b in their tenure... but that is not the worst of it, all the spending will result in TCC debt being over $2.1b by 2028 and over $3b by 2034. TCC debt was just $58m in 2003, about $460m in 2016-2017, so the debt increases have been huge in the last decade and that is massively accelerating.

Once this debt is created it is to late to undo it.

In case the outcome of this is not clear... remember this "MORE DEBT = MORE RATES"

If debt increases from $400m a few years ago to >$2b in 2028 (x5+), then what do you think will happen to annual rates?


In an aside

Posted on 13-03-2025 21:18 | By nerak

are those 3 or 4 packets of confectionery on the desk in front of you to be used as sweeteners for dissenting voices? And who paid for them?


Gold

Posted on 13-03-2025 21:35 | By Informed

So the same people complaining about council spending, now want the council to spend 1-2M on an inquiry that will tell them what? All the decisions are public record and the commissioners were hired to get Tauranga moving. And that’s what they did.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.