2:29:39 Saturday 19 April 2025

Court dismisses bid to halt marine precinct sale

Tauranga Marine Precinct at Sulphur Point. Photo / Brydie Thompson

A judge has dismissed an injunction halting the controversial sale of Tauranga’s Marine Precinct.

Justice Peter Andrew’s decision, released on Friday, said the interim injunction order was no longer in force and had been discharged.

He found the arguments for stopping the sale “generally weak”, while claims of a local boat fleet being harmed were “overstated”.

Tauranga City Council’s $13.98 million sale of the precinct to Christchurch developer Sam Rofe was due to settle in November, but was halted by a last-minute High Court interim injunction.

The injunction was filed by Sean Kelly, managing director of marine service company Pacific 7, who owns land at the precinct.

Kelly also applied for a judicial review of the council’s processes relating to the transaction.

The basis for Pacific 7’s injunction was the displacement of the working boats that use the precinct and a lack of consultation regarding the sale with precinct users.

The case was heard by Justice Andrew in the High Court at Tauranga in February, with the public gallery so full that an overflow courtroom was needed.

Justice Andrew’s decision said the merits of Pacific 7’s claims were “generally weak”.

“I concluded that Pacific 7 had overstated the impact on the black boat fleet. I reject the claim of irreparable harm.”

An aerial overview of the Tauranga marine precinct. The precinct is outlined in red, the blue shaded areas are privately owned. Image / Tauranga City Council

The haul-out and fit-out services of the Marine Precinct would remain available after the sale to Pacific 7 and other users on commercial terms, Justice Andrew said.

The development agreement allowed use of the precinct by the working boat fleet for at least the next three years.

There were also alternative locations for Pacific 7 and the working boats, he said.

Despite these factors, there would be a “material change” for Pacific 7 and others at the precinct likely to face “a period of considerable uncertainty”.

In regard to the claim about a lack of consultation, Justice Andrew said the council “went beyond minimum requirements for consultation”.

It carried out engagement outside of and after the 2021– 2031 Long-Term Plan amendment process, he said.

The council formed the Marine Precinct Advisory Group after an independent review in 2019 and Kelly was a member.

There was consultation by TwentyTwo consultants from June 2021 to December 2022. This involved several reports and episodes of engagement with the council and Marine Precinct stakeholders.

Pacific 7 managing director Sean Kelly on the Tauranga Harbour in 2018. Photo / John Cousins

The stakeholders’ consultation included Pacific 7 and the Harvey Family Fishing Group.

The option of the type of disposal of the precinct was expressly canvassed on multiple occasions, Justice Andrew said.

Justice Andrew acknowledged the significant contribution Kelly made to the Marine Precinct community.

He concluded that during the relevant consultation and decision-making period Kelly had “stepped back significantly from the Marine Precinct”.

From 2022, Kelly took a two-year break for a sailing trip with his family.

He had previously told TwentyTwo that he did not plan to continue operating at the Marine Precinct, Justice Andrew said.

“Mr Kelly’s position may well have changed, but his apparent surprise late in the piece that the precinct was to be sold does appear, in substantial part, to be explicable by his absence.”

Pacific 7’s lawyer Matthew King told Local Democracy Reporting his client was reviewing the decision and taking legal advice on next steps.

Tauranga City Council confirmed on Friday it had received the High Court judgment.

Publication of the judgment was embargoed for 24 hours, until Saturday morning and the council would make a statement once the court embargo was lifted.

Both parties have been asked about their next steps in the case. Counsel for Rofe was also approached for comment on the judgment.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

9 comments

Why does this leave me...

Posted on 12-04-2025 13:53 | By morepork

... feeling uncomfortable? I'm certainly not involved in any way with the transaction. It just doesn't seem to have had Mr. Kelly's objections adequately considered, discussed, and resolved. We like to think that our Courts and Justice system can resolve issues between people, but I have this uncomfortable feeling that that is not what has happened here.


Hmmm

Posted on 12-04-2025 16:38 | By Let's get real

I don't think that the issue is the sale, but rather the evident ineptitude of the council staff involved in the outcome.
Ratepayers are now required to fund a new pier as well as the loss of return from the sale itself.
Millions of dollars loss to extremely poor negotiation skills as well as funding another commercial construction in the harbour (I wonder what the negotiations around that construction will cost).
SOME of our city leaders have behaved shamefully in my opinion, but rather than having to accept responsibility and censure for their actions it will be riden out and ignored until something else goes wrong.


Marine Precinct

Posted on 12-04-2025 18:02 | By Noel Silver

This decision has a bad smell about it.
The Precinct was valued at about $19 million
and then it is sold for a discount of $5 + million.??? WHY. This is a Ratepayer asset and the ratepayers were not consulted in the sale of their asset. Then to rub salt into the wounds they hit them with a 12% rate increase. Mayor and councillors maybe jobless at the next election.


The Master

Posted on 12-04-2025 19:21 | By Ian Stevenson

Lets face it, the court has confirmed that a land sale that is a disaster, mess and even the Mayor confirmed he did not like the terms of sale, has been rubber stamped...

So that means Tauranga ratepayers are shafted for $50+ million loss/costs and debt. To be clear, this si a typical TCC deal done, what a mess it is.

PS: - we can now look forward to the sale and on sale for exclusive apartments with private yacht berths included, all thanks to TCC staff and the debt so created.


Last straw

Posted on 13-04-2025 06:03 | By Mein Fuhrer

Had enough of TCC and their utter contempt for rate payers, I'll be packing up and moving to the mainland sooner than planned.


Courts

Posted on 13-04-2025 09:36 | By an_alias

Yeah sadly they seem to be full of special interest appointments.
So we can take it Council did not fail any laws and its allowed to sell public property at a loss and then spend double that amount to improve it for the special interest developer.
Can we find out if any commissioners or council have received special interest payments over this time ?
It all doesnt pass the smell test


Still reeks

Posted on 13-04-2025 10:35 | By Kancho

So the dubious deal goes through but still needs scrutiny as to why it was sold under valuation and why?
Seems the council has a lot to explain and why they are not addressing the elephant in the room or the heap it leaves behind and that is of restructuring and cuts in non essential spending. I think council probably has sunk to a new low in credibility even as they bang on about transparency accountability and cost savings.
To think we elected them to make a difference but got more of the same .


Demand Answers

Posted on 13-04-2025 21:26 | By Yadick

It's awkward as Sean is out of town giving professional service to the Manawanui recovery for the Navy, for New Zealand.
As ratepayers we should absolutely be supporting him and DEMANDING answers as to what the hell Tauranga City Council think they're doing.
We voted on the promises of clarity, of change, of support, of honesty, of transparency, of democracy, of integrity.
STAND DOWN MAHÉ - STAND DOWN.
I was absolutely disgusted with Mahuta's Commissioners and our new Council is just Commissioners in wolves clothes.
You have people that put their trust in you, that put their lives in your hands and you are breaching every bit of morality.


@Yadick

Posted on 16-04-2025 13:36 | By morepork

Your last 4 lines sum up the feelings of many. I have voted in every election (national and local) throughout my life. I consider it a civic duty and it would be immoral to criticize if you didn't vote.
But this time? I am more disappointed and disillusioned by this Mayor and Council than ever before, and I don't intend to vote.
I see NOTHING that is commendable in the attitude and actions of the Mayor and the Council. They have undermined the true democracy we are entitled to, and embarked on duplicitious, underhand co-governance and race-based appointments. I get the feeling there is some brown paper bagging going on as well, but I have no evidence of it.
And the little tin hat is the increase in Rates, with no sign of decrease in Council costs.
You are right and I agree with you.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.