PM Luxon open to scrapping regional councils

PM Christopher Luxon says he's open to scrapping regional councils amid RMA reform. Photo / File

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says he wants to explore the possibility of scrapping New Zealand’s regional councils as the Government reforms the Resource Management Act.

NZ First minister Shane Jones told a local government forum last week his party does not see a compelling case for maintaining regional government.

Speaking to Newstalk ZB today from Belgium before the Nato leaders’ summit in The Hague, Luxon was asked whether he supported disestablishing regional councils.

“I have a personal view that I think that’s something that we can explore as part of that Resource Management Act legislation that Chris Bishop is driving through,” he responded.

Luxon said Bishop, as Minister for RMA Reform, would bring a bill before the House before the end of the year but also said he believed there were too many layers of government.

Jones, speaking at last week’s forum as reported by the Post, said there was “less and less of a justifiable purpose for maintaining regional government” after the expected RMA reform.

“After the upcoming changes to the RMA, I doubt, well, certainly in the party I belong to, that there’s going to be a compelling case for regional government to continue to exist.“

New Zealand has 11 regional councils. According to Local Government NZ’s definition, regional councils played a “core role” in managing natural resources such as land and water, supporting biodiversity, providing regional transport and building resilience to natural hazards and the effects of climate change.

Luxon today was also asked about the potential of capping council rates increases, to which he said Local Government Minister Simon Watts was assessing options.

He added councils should organise their finances better, saying they needed to be “smart with the balance sheet” and use debt in different ways.

Bishop, who is also the Housing Minister, last week announced a new power in the RMA that gave central government the ability to overrule local councils if their decisions were going to negatively impact economic growth, development or employment.

Before using the power, a minister would need to check whether the council’s decision was consistent with the national direction under the RMA, and engage with the council.

It would only be an interim measure while the Government worked on new RMA laws, which were due to take effect in 2027 to align with the councils’ next Long-Term Plans.

7 comments

Too Much

Posted on 23-06-2025 12:16 | By Merlin

Too much now they want to oversighting Regional Councils and create more job losses with already the highest unemployment in a decade at 211,000.


Worth looking at

Posted on 23-06-2025 12:36 | By morepork

Nothing against our Regional Council here, but I have to wonder just exactly what they do? I see them take a modest amount per month from my Bank account, separate from the TCC, and I often wonder why they exist.
I think it is good if government take at least a review of these councils.


By all means….

Posted on 23-06-2025 13:56 | By Shadow1

…bring it on. Most of us are still reeling from the Regional Council’s last increase in rates. It shows that they are stepping over the line when it comes to supplying services that most of us don’t need. No public consultation whatsoever. They also seem to want to sell some of the Port shares when they are a good source of dividends. What are they thinking of!
By all means get rid of them and find someone else to do their job.
Shadow1


Can't happen soon enough

Posted on 23-06-2025 16:22 | By nerak

There was a time when Tauranga managed very well without this money lover's club. My only concern would be how many might end up at TCC in the future, something I would really not want to see. As with TCC, the money BOPRC splash around is not theirs.


Duplication

Posted on 23-06-2025 16:49 | By Watchdog

Regional Councils work used to be carried out by main city and County Councils. It sees when our Bay of PLenty Regional Council set up it moved into the glamorous and expensive building at 1 Elizabeth Street. Then we watched our Regional rates climb ever higher. The buses cost me over $1200 per annum because I have three properties. As far as I know no one in those three properties ever uses the bus. So we are paying all this money for no benefit. The buses run around empty much of the time. I believe we would benefit from smaller buses which don't take up so much room on the roads.
Amalgamate them back into one unit. Duplication of administration etc all wastes money i.m.o.


Odd?

Posted on 25-06-2025 21:04 | By nerak

Have never noticed TV ads for BOPRC until they have now come under threat? "look at what we do". TCC can do the same...


Over Heads

Posted on 26-06-2025 11:04 | By k Smith

Lots of good comments here, when speaking about the Elizabeth ST new building (I did some work on the refurbishment here) its a nice to have sort of thing. The new building the TCC costs millions in over heads +. There should have been a study done on these two costs as the more over heads on two buildings means money is not spent where its should be, infrastructure, etc. Should the TCC or the Government appointed officials looked at combining the two separate buildings into one saving over head costs. The TCC has just sacked around 100 staff (makes more room) and the BOPRC spends lots of its income on the new Elizabeth ST building?
If the RMA is scraped I suspect the TCC rates will increase more. Pensioners should be exempt from the BOP regional rates. (Life is closer to the end)


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.