Changes to child restraint laws enforced this month are causing havoc for one Western Bay primary school which is now struggling to offer its junior students educational outings.
From November 1 the age of children required to travel in an approved child restraint increased from five-years-old to seven.
Katikati Primary School students Miles Jonson, 6, Leo Willacy, 6, Nate McKeown, 5, and Hannah Gourlay, 6, are upset that new booster seat rules mean they may miss out on educational trips.
It is a move aimed at increasing child safety on New Zealand roads, but Katikati Primary School deputy principal Anne Morriss says it's preventing ‘highly beneficial' trips for junior students.
She says the school cannot afford to purchase the number of booster seats required for travel for its 170 children aged seven and under.
'The implications for us are huge. As a school, this poses two issues: it will be a great expense [to provide booster seats for those without them], and where are we going to keep all of these seats?”
Anne says the ratio of children to parents will also decrease, because most private vehicles can only fit two seats in the back, whereas before you could fit three youngsters in the backseat.
Her school now has to ensure all students under seven have seats to travel anywhere – 'including those from low socio-economic backgrounds, who may not own their own seat”.
'I personally think it's a real pity because what is going to end up happening is nobody will plan anything that is an outdoor education opportunity.”
Anne says while some schools can charge parents for excursions, 'for many of our families this will be prohibitive, and we will not be able to afford a bus”.
Katikati Primary offers three trips a year to its 300-plus junior students (14 classes), of which170 children are under the age of seven, but Anne says 'this will probably be down to nil”.
'Our children are not going to get learning opportunities outside of the school, which are so beneficial – even our local heritage museum is too far to walk,” says Anne, who is looking to offer activities within walking distance.
The school will also have to purchase three booster seats to have 'on tap” for children needing transport in an emergency or when ill.
'We're disadvantaged in we're not in the city and we do have to travel for things.”
An approved restraint is one that suits the child's height and weight, as specified on the seat. This can be a harnessed child restraint, a full backed booster seat, or a half booster cushion.
What do you think? Comment here.
6 comments
dammed if you do!!!
Posted on 15-11-2013 10:55 | By Sambo Returns
dammed if you dont, while understanding the schools position, its a little late now to voice your concerns, and this law is for the safety of children, at school and out, and 3 booster seats??? I am sure the school can get a "kiddy" company to purchase them, think of ways to be positive, not let little negative things block your teaching.
Society has let the bureaucrats win
Posted on 15-11-2013 11:21 | By Annalist
This is just another consequence of the over the top no risk whatsoever blame culture we've got ourselves into. The next thing children won't be able to go outside without protective body suits and crash helmets in case they fall over. We'll also have food police and petty rules and regulations about anything a busybody can dream up.
New Invention
Posted on 15-11-2013 12:20 | By really?
There is this fantastic new invention called buses, no child seat required. Why does the school need to transport the ill or in an emergency, they invented ambulances too.
,
Posted on 15-11-2013 13:53 | By whatsinaname
why is it so important for these young children to go on school trips........ Yes car restraints are very important. Imagine you were driving a car to transport children to such outings and No car restraints and you had an accident.... Like by really, said. what is wrong with hireing a bus. also if it is known that the children are going on an outing what is wrong with there car seat restraint be left at the school to be put in the car that is being used. NO its NOT going over the top, its called saftey.
Ironic really
Posted on 15-11-2013 21:21 | By heather
Take the bus and no booster seats, seat belts or any other safety measure required....take the kids in a car for a school outing and you have to have everything! As a parent what would you rather see, your kids in a car with seatbelts & probably airbags, or in a bus with absolutely nothing to keep them on the seat during a sudden stop or heaven forbid a real accident when they will shoot out of their seats and end up in a great pile at the front of the bus or even go through the windscreen!!
So angry
Posted on 15-11-2013 22:54 | By m.lints
Firstly it is the law for children under 7 to have a restraint so every child should have their own seat anyway and its not as if the trips are everyday, surely the school can plan ahead and arrange for each child to bring their seat to school they are light weight and sit on them to get to school or if organised can have them brought surely. If they were going swimming they would bring togs.... and secondly as a mother who is now living everyday with the consequences of what can happen if you are in an accident and your child is not properly restrained, live a day in my shoes putting my son in a wheelchair is a life lesson I now have to live with. Surely our children are worth preserving. Make it happen!
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.