A Tauranga City Councillor's discussion for a more representational-based voting system has been scuppered by colleagues' belief the city is content with simply sticking to First Past the Post.
Under the Local Electoral Act 2001, Tauranga City Council has the opportunity to review the electoral system –First Past the Post or Single Transferrable Vote – following the local body elections.
Tauranga City Councillor Gail McIntosh.
The decision is to be adopted in time for the next triennial elections in October 2016.
In council chambers on Monday councillors voted 8-3 in favour of retaining the FPP system, with councillor Gail McIntosh, Catherine Stewart and Rich Curach in opposition.
Traditionally FPP has been the only electoral system used for all local government and District Health Board elections. In 2004 STV became mandatory for DHB's while councils still have the ability to choose.
Speaking to SunLive, Gail believes a change is needed towards a fair and favourable representation of minorities, including women, in terms of representation on local bodies.
'This (STV) is one step forward to getting better representation in our community.”
STV is designed to achieve proportional representation through ranked voting in multi-seat voting districts.
Under STV, a person has a single vote that is initially allocated to their most preferred candidate and, as the count proceeds and candidates are either elected or eliminated, is transferred to other candidates according to the voter's stated preferences, in proportion to any surplus or discarded votes.
Gail says her colleagues' approach to retain a 'simple” method without seriously considering the fairer benefits is disappointing.
'First Past the Post isn't as good as STV because it takes longer to get an answer. Well I don't think that matters at all.
'What if it wasn't two or three days until we got our results like the DHB. It doesn't matter you are electing people for three years and you are electing them for important things.”
A chorus of councillors believe FPP is a voting system that is tried and true and with no community indication for change why do so.
'It's been a voting system that's been around for a 100 years and people understand it,” says councillor Clayton Mitchell.
'I remember getting taught it when I was at school. It's the most preferred and most simple.”
Councillor Bill Grainger says council must stay with of simplicity to not confuse the public judging by last year's 38 per cent of voting turnout.
Councillor Bev Edlin says if the current voting system 'isn't broke” then why go to the trouble of fixing it.
8 comments
It's about the fairest system
Posted on 19-08-2014 18:50 | By Murray.Guy
Once again the elected members who choose to put self preservation / self interest before best outcome is clearly identified. Single Transferrable Voting applies to the Health Board as a legal requirement and it makes NO sense for Tauranga City Council to NOT adopt the same to avoid confusion and secure an outcome the best reflects the voting. How an elected member can claim it is what we (the community) want beats me as WE have not been asked. It is untrue to state that STV is confusing and would impact on the voter turnout and or invalid votes as this is now proven to be NOT the case around NZ.
Why????
Posted on 20-08-2014 05:02 | By Sambo Returns
should gender, race or anything else matter, if you are good enough you get in, simple really, and Gail you also better include in your submissions voting for T.E.C.T board members, as there is no female sitting on that board!!!!.
So,
Posted on 20-08-2014 08:02 | By nerak
just because a system has been in existence for 100 years it should stay? Rubbish. A lot of arrogant councillors we have, who think their employers are content with an ancient system. Obviously they didn't think to ask us, which they should have done. Too busy protecting their butts. ‘A chorus of councillors' indeed, more like a chorus of grannies, too cosy to do a bit of hard work. A UK councillor was once heard to declare 'We missed the point that cities are about meeting the needs of people”. As for Bill, classic arrogance right there, in a nutshell you tag your employers as stupid. Bev, the quote is ‘if it aint broke, don't fix it'. How do you know it aint broke? Bothered to ask anyone who voted you in? Once more, wide cracks showing in council makeup. Try something novel, work for your employers, not yourselves.
Fingers
Posted on 20-08-2014 08:21 | By Capt_Kaveman
this lady has currently 2 fingers in a pie now, Reminds me of Judith Collins, Why dont people like this that get their votes by word of mouth among the elderly, Who hasn't even lived in Tauranga that long really, Has no direction then comes up with something that has nothing to do with her as a job of being on the TCC, When making out she is so great yet is part of this new council that has failed the rate payers in reducing debt but increasing it + a 6.7% increase.
Could Murray Guy explain?
Posted on 20-08-2014 10:28 | By Councillorwatch
Why, if this STV is so good, why wasn't it put in place when he was a councillor? Did he ever move that as a new voting system? Why follow the Health Board STV voting system anyway? Just how well does the health board perform, not counting the ability to clock up air travel? Finally, if it is untrue to say that STV is confusing could former councillor Guy please explain the "algorithm" used by the STV computer to decide who wins.
KISS
Posted on 20-08-2014 12:52 | By Jitter
Sorry Gail I agree with what you and others say but if you want more people to vote you must "Keep It Simple Stupid". Make it any more complicated and you will have far more people just not voting. If you want more people to vote make all voting both for Central and local government and all statutory boards compulsory. This works overseas.
KISS
Posted on 20-08-2014 12:53 | By Jitter
Sorry Gail I agree with what you and others say but if you want more people to vote you must "Keep It Simple Stupid". Make it any more complicated and you will have far more people just not voting. If you want more people to vote make all voting both for Central and local government and all statutory boards compulsory. This works overseas.
STV can't be explained simply
Posted on 24-08-2014 12:52 | By BullShtAlert
I know of many people who give up on voting for the Health board because of the numbering system and nobody can explain to me how the winners get to win. And just to make it even worse, the government of the day gets to appoint people to the health board despite the election??? How's that for democracy?
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.