Prospects of future international flights jetting into Tauranga have been met with a firm no, with airport officials citing financial and environmental implications following Rotorua's sudden decision to stop flights abroad.
From April 25, 2015 Rotorua International Airport will cease international flights after Rotorua District Council decided to stop paying Air New Zealand to run twice-weekly flights to Sydney earlier this month.
Tauranga Airport. Photo: File.
International flights began between the two centres in December 2009, initially with three flights per week, before being reduced to two in January 2010.
Tauranga Airport manager Ray Dumble says contrary to belief there may be a gap in the market, but the airport will not be looking to add international flights to its roster.
Tauranga Airport is the fifth busiest controlled airport in New Zealand and capable of handling large aircraft such as Boeing 737-800 and Airbus 320.
He says there are a number of factors which stand between the airport and international flights, including financial and environmental - something they are not willing to move past.
Ray explains: 'We are right in the middle of the city and would have off-peak jets which wouldn't be very good at one o'clock in the morning when they are running a bit late.
'There are also massive costs, as proven by Hamilton, Palmerston North and Rotorua proving that it doesn't work [running costs including security, customs, and administration].”
Since 2009 the Rotorua District Council has paid $9.13 million to Air New Zealand as part of a "joint venture marketing" programme to keep the flights in Rotorua.
In addition Tauranga Airport would have to fence the airfield, costing about $1m and totally changing the way it operates, says Ray.
'When you fly out of here you would have to be screened because we would have to make it a sterile environment,” he adds.
But his main concern with opening up the airport to overseas flights is the environmental risk.
'I mean we had Psa nearly kill us,” says Ray, 'and we don't want to bring it back.
'I just think of the Tiger Moth in West Auckland - they still haven't got rid of it. It still rears its ugly head every now and then.
'So if we bought something like that into here we would stuff our billion dollar industry.”
A KVH spokesperson says the cancellation of trans-Tasman international flights in and out of Rotorua Airport means there is one less biosecurity risk pathway into New Zealand.
Since the flights started in 2009, Rotorua International Airport has been a potential entry pathway for biosecurity risks into the country, she says.
Of particular concern was the risk of importing Queensland fruit fly from Australia directly into the Bay of Plenty.
Last year KVH completed a preliminary review of border interventions at Rotorua Airport to ensure potential biosecurity risks to the kiwifruit industry were being managed appropriately.
The report stated Rotorua International Airport presented a low biosecurity risk compared to more than 70 per cent of international passengers landing in Auckland.
'While KVH was satisfied with the level of biosecurity intervention on this pathway, the cancellation of the flights eliminates this risk altogether and enables MPI resources to be applied to managing other pathways,” says the spokesperson.



18 comments
Who would even consider this?
Posted on 24-10-2014 10:04 | By Phailed1
Just look at the huge costs Rotorua has been left with. The costs of getting airport to international standard, the cost of the money paid to Air NZ to keep the flights coming, and now the costs of it folding. Just how many millions would have all that cost the Rotorua ratepayer???
Good call
Posted on 24-10-2014 10:59 | By mutley
Great to see that good sense has prevailed on this matter. We have a very nice and user friendly airport - small is indeed beautiful. It is also easy to connect with international flights by checking in at Tauranga so for us its the best of both worlds.Good work Ray Dumble.
In the future perhaps
Posted on 24-10-2014 12:14 | By dookie
Good call for the present. But I think this would be fantastic for Tauranga one day, and I know I'd certainly use it several times a year.
Costs millions?
Posted on 24-10-2014 12:55 | By YOGI BEAR
Well that means our beloved Tauranga Council will dive head long into it. One thing for sure is they know how to spend money and common sense has long since left the room.
Negitivity...once again
Posted on 24-10-2014 13:16 | By rosco532
Golden opportunity going astray here guys...The International Airport should have been taken by Tauranga in the 1st place..(so central)..Heres a great chance to pick the eyes and buy what Hamilton /Rotorua needed to operate (at 2nd hand prices)..and instal them in Tauranga..Up goes Tourism,Business,Employment,Horticulture exports (as well as exporting fresh fish etc)..Find a business Manager who can do a deal with another airline if Air NZ won't come to the party with fairer pricing..Gotta be on a winner here !!!
Great decision Ray.
Posted on 24-10-2014 14:15 | By Garret
We don't need to be an international airport. It's hard enough to keep the tourists in Tauranga when they arrive on the ships, so to spend millions on upgrading the airport, and then not be able to make profit from it, is a one way trip to disaster. Let's keep Tauranga simple.
Great!
Posted on 24-10-2014 15:37 | By sojourner
I am so happy with this decision. Thank you for being wise and smart about it whoever you are :)
Small town thinking
Posted on 24-10-2014 17:51 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Typical $10.00 Tauranga. This City! is growing, think towards the Future, an International Airport is just what you need, for many GOOD financial outcomes.
International Airport
Posted on 24-10-2014 21:51 | By bogside
It is obvious that some people have no concept of business viability and so they make projections that they will never have to face up to. So to pick on one - Martin B - please post your business plan for an international airport in Tauranga and include all the things we will need to consider to make a decision about committing to it. As far as I am concerned I am quite happy to get on a commuter flight from TRG and be checked through to wherever I am going just as I would from San Diego at the other end to get home. My advice is for all those with grandiose visions of big jets flying out of TRG - be thankful that someone has had the sense to remove it from any plans.
Trains
Posted on 25-10-2014 07:20 | By Jenny Wotten
If we had a good train service to Auckland city and airport that would be a good solution. That's how other countries do it.
Here's an idea?
Posted on 25-10-2014 08:35 | By The author of this comment has been removed.
Go back to the original plan. An airport serving both cities based at Paengaroa. With the new highway finishing that makes even more sense, it would be a half hour drive to the airport. Sell the land at the mount to pay for some of it, the rest coming from central government.
Rail
Posted on 25-10-2014 08:56 | By philiphallen
Jenny has it right... The biggest asset the country has, the rail systems, needs to be updated and put to better use, for Kiwis and tourists. Look at all the European counties now building more railways and improving inter transport connections. So Mr Bridges get your finger out and spend some money wisely.
Not now.
Posted on 25-10-2014 11:44 | By morepork
Trains? Good idea... Connections? seems to work OK at the moment. There is no need to take a considerable risk for intangible results at this time. Maybe Paengaroa COULD be a good option, but I'd see that 20 years down the track. What we have is adequate, the bio-security risk is a valid argument, the promised rewards from tourism may not eventuate and we are already in a huge amount of debt. We should postpone this until the benefits are clearer AND we can AFFORD it.
Think
Posted on 29-10-2014 16:09 | By MadDogJosh
Look at Dunedin they have international flights yet they are smaller than us, also we now have an international cricket stadium which also helps a lot. If Dunedin can pay for it why can't we. Everybody from Rotorua, Whakatane and western bay will fly through there. Now thats a lot of people
@ Bogside
Posted on 31-10-2014 15:42 | By YOGI BEAR
Business viability? Don't know what planet you are on here, Rotorua ratepayers were forking out millions to AirNZ to keep a few flights going and run up mega millions in losses annually. Tauranga already makes a $2.5m loss annually with international. The number of flights would be very small and costs high, this will only add to the overall loss increasing more than now. So using your idea of "business sense" we should actually be donating all flights to Rotorua and then ask Regional BOP to run a regular free bus trip to/from Rotorua for flight passengers. End result Tauranga Ratepayers would not have any cost, we are all better off for that and Rotorua ratepayers are paying all the loss.
Right Decision
Posted on 14-11-2014 13:32 | By BVG
The public of Tauranga perhaps might benefit from assessing how great an asset to our community our airport really is? International flights will not benefit our community at all. Rotorua & Hamilton have found this out the hard way & lost considerable credibility & money doing it. The Tauranga Airport appears well managed & is one of the easiest to access in the whole country along with being a viable operating "model" for others to copy. Mr R Dumble's comments seem realistic & prudent to me.
BVG
Posted on 17-11-2014 09:44 | By YOGI BEAR
I agree with most of what you have said, however it is not a 'viable' operation, it is currently costing $1.6m a year in losses. Hamilton and Rotorua are sad cases of going to far, but Tauranga ratepayers are already propping up Tauranga airport now, the international idea will simply make that worse.
Rotorua Airport
Posted on 20-11-2014 10:36 | By YOGI BEAR
Last I knew Mayor Crosby was part of the director's. It looks like he has been able to transfer the 'magic' from Tauranga, they now have unsustainable losses also.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.