Feedback sought on Tauranga stadium proposal

An artist’s impression of the proposed community stadium at the Tauranga Domain. Photo: TCC.

Public views are being sought on a proposed $220 million stadium for central Tauranga.

Tauranga City Council is asking for initial feedback on the 'community stadium” at the Tauranga Domain through a survey that will be available online until July 21.

The proposed 'people's stadium” would provide 7000 permanent seats with the provision for an additional 8000 temporary seats.

It would also include a 'light” exhibition centre; a 1300 sqm function centre, a community multi-use facility with 400 sqm of changing rooms and lounge space, and a sports science/physiotherapy space.

The stadium has long been opposed by the sports clubs that could be left homeless by its construction.

If built, the stadium is expected to displace the Tauranga Croquet Club, the Tauranga Bowling Club, and demolish the all-weather athletics track. It would also require some of the Tauranga Lawn Tennis Club's courts to be relocated.

The croquet club, tennis club, the Tauranga Millennium Track Trust that built the athletics track, and the Bay of Plenty Speedway Association formed the Hands Off Tauranga Domain alliance and held a protest against the stadium in March.

Tauranga Millennium Track Trust member Garth Mathieson previously told Local Democracy Reporting some of the affected clubs were offered relocation, but suitable sites had not been identified and there was no funding allocated for relocation.

'The master plans are an extinction notice for a number of city assets and organisations.

'If you're going to go and destroy other assets you need to have a good reason to do so, and that just doesn't exist.”

Hands off Tauranga Domain alliance members Gretchen Benvie, Michel Galloway, Mark Decke, Murray Clarkson and Garth Mathieson want the domain to stay a greenspace. Photo: John Borren/Sun Live.

Tauranga Croquet Club president Gretchen Benvie said previously, the club's four lawns were world class – they would become parking if the stadium was built.

'They want to pave paradise and turn it into a parking lot.”

Benvie along with other members of the alliance want the greenspace at the domain retained, she said.

A preliminary business case for the proposed stadium, led by Western Bay of Plenty economic development agency Priority One, was presented to the council on May 1.

Priority One chief executive Nigel Tutt told the meeting location analysis showed Tauranga Domain was the right place for the stadium.

'Stadiums are complex and difficult … it's not something for the faint hearted,” he said.

'Plenty of people have opinions, either to not do it or to do it way bigger, but we are really, really confident that we have this in the best configuration.”

It would be open to the public provided it was not in use, said Tutt.

'We don't want this to be a concrete jungle, something that everyone gets to look at from afar.”

Tauranga City Council commissioners wanted a better understanding of the potential benefits and costs, and to gauge initial community support before deciding whether to proceed any further, according to a statement released today.

'Funding options are still being explored, however a proportion of the funding would be likely to come from rates,” said commissioner Stephen Selwood.

Commissioner Stephen Selwood said the council needed to weigh up the potential benefits and costs of the stadium before proceeding. Photo: John Borren/Sun Live.

'A community stadium at Tauranga Domain would support our city centre aspirations, but we need to weigh up its potential benefits and costs, and the views of the community, especially at a time when the cost of living is front of everyone's mind and we've already committed to investing in other much-needed projects such as Te Manawataki o Te Papa – the Civic Precinct, which will help drive a significant revitalisation of the city centre.”

The estimated cost for Te Manawataki o Te Papa – the Civic Precinct was $303 million, with $151.5 million funded by ratepayers.

The council's manager spaces and places Alison Law said whatever happened with the stadium, council staff would continue to work with organisations currently located at the domain to ensure their needs were met, now and in the future.

'We're committed to working with all the groups involved so we can address any potential opportunities and challenges together,” said Law.

'This includes identifying future options for possible relocation of some sports groups as part of a broader project to make better use of our community spaces, and so that we are prepared if the stadium does go ahead.”

After considering the initial community feedback, as well as the 'wider economic and social benefits” and proposed funding options, the commissioners would decide whether to proceed any further, which could see the proposal included in the draft 2024-34 Long-term Plan community consultation process.

Consultation on the draft 2024-34 Long-term Plan was expected to take place in November, which would provide a further opportunity for everyone in the community to share their feedback, before a decision on the proposed community stadium was made.

It's early days and no decisions have been made yet, so we really encourage everyone to get involved and share their thoughts,” said Selwood.

The survey is available on the council's website until July 21.

Public Interest Journalism funded through NZ On Air

15 comments

stadium

Posted on 03-07-2023 18:27 | By dumbkof2

its a foregone conclusion tolly and co will spend more millions on something that is not needed


NO stadium!!! NO!!!

Posted on 03-07-2023 19:23 | By Bruja

Use the money to build pensioner units to replace the ones you've 'flogged off' PLUS the ones you should have built 10 years ago!!! PEOPLE HOUSED before stadiums!!!


Are the commissioners deaf?

Posted on 04-07-2023 08:12 | By waiknot

Without a survey people’s views on the stadium have been voiced very loudly already. NO


Not required

Posted on 04-07-2023 08:43 | By Brian P Porter

A stadium is a "nice to have" but we can't afford this type of waisted expenditure. The Commissioner's have waisted enough of our money.


COMPLETE A SUBMISSION

Posted on 04-07-2023 09:39 | By Equality

OUR ONE CHANCE TO TELL COUNCIL EXACTLY WHAT WE THINK OF THEM !!!


Keystone

Posted on 04-07-2023 12:59 | By Let's get real

It has long been thought of as instrumental in supporting the alcohol business in the CBD. Quite interesting with the current woke thinking about the harm caused by alcohol. One sport drives public opinion in NZ, you only have to look at the honours awarded for being good at your job. A stadium is available, but obviously isn't impressive enough and there's land that is used for it's intended purpose 6 times a year in a very accessible part of town, under threat of court proceedings if the elitist groups are impinged upon. Build a new Hospital and sports complex (including a stadium for the boofheads) at the racecourse and golf course and use the TECT Park for racing and golf. We need a fit for purpose Hospital with excellent access and improved parking for the entire community.


The Business Case...

Posted on 04-07-2023 14:26 | By morepork

... has been done and establishes that a stadium is required and the location should be the current Domain. Really? Who will actually benefit from such a project? Apart from the millions required to do it, (a windfall for groups like Priority One - who provided the "business case"...), how will the stadium continue to justify its existence once it has been built? What about the costs of relocating existing users, or are they just to be ignored? Where will the 7000 users park their cars, or are they expected to ride their bikes to the imagined future events? The Domain is an oasis of green in a burgeoning city. Why is it being dismissed so enthusiastically by the people responsible for our city at the moment? This project needs to be stopped NOW, before it goes any further, and before it is irrevocable.


Sumission? LOL

Posted on 04-07-2023 17:45 | By kiwisan

Submissions are a great way for council to tick a box. Then you will get. We have heard what you want...... We have listened to the people..... and then tell us what we want! You will never see the results of the submissions in any form. Seen it often at places I have worked at and in the wider community. We then feel placated and reassured that our voice has been heard. However its a load of BS.


Words!

Posted on 04-07-2023 18:06 | By nerak

They are like numbers, twist them to mean something to you, not to others. We have the council’s "manager spaces and places" (what?), saying council would continue to work with organisations currently located at the domain to ensure their needs were met, now and in the future. That's BS! Just placatory words. They won't fulfill that promise. And Nigel Tutt told the meeting location analysis" (lol) showed Tauranga Domain was the right place for the stadium. Location analysis?? More BS. Stephen Selwood, are you going to be paying rates alongside us? No, didn't think so. But do enjoy my money in your back pocket, won't you. Every city needs some greenspace, don't wreck this one and have more irate residents from the racket at some events.


REALLY

Posted on 04-07-2023 22:09 | By The Caveman

IT'S a DONE DEAL by the LEACHES that currently do what they like in Tauranga


Can't Wait

Posted on 05-07-2023 07:12 | By Inmediasres

Yes, can't wait for the new stadium. Ignore the vocal minority, the majority want this to happen. It's shocking that a city the size of Tauranga doesn't have a stadium. Baypark certainly doesn't count.


Can't Wait

Posted on 05-07-2023 08:34 | By Wundrin

Show me the proof of the vocal being the minority. Seriously, $200M on top of the 300-odd already committed to the civic development? With the inevitable overruns, that will come to how much?


@Wundrin

Posted on 05-07-2023 09:27 | By Equality

I am fully aware of the uselessness of a submission and think you are right - it is a done deal. HOWEVER it is a chance to put in words on an official paper exactly what we the ratepayers think of the commissioners. No holds barred!


I had almost forgotten

Posted on 05-07-2023 10:17 | By Let's get real

And no doubt others will have forgotten, the very recent (last year?) Admission from another council on cost overruns for another sports stadium. Christchurch ratepayers were left in a position of having to accept the increased cost because, basically, rugby wanted it. We don't have to have a stadium of luxurious proportions and just like a museum, we don't particularly want one.


Sorry 'Wundrin'

Posted on 05-07-2023 13:27 | By Equality

My comment was directed to 'Kiwisan'.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.