Three Waters: Big questions over council books

The coalition scrapped the previous government's plans for water reform. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver.

Every three years, councils across the country have to refresh their 10-year financial plans and ask the public for feedback. 2023 is meant to be one of those years.

But the demise of Three Waters, along with uncertainty about the future of water infrastructure, has thrown massive question marks over some councils' books and plans.

Wade through the Water Services Acts Repeal Bill and you will find a section titled 'transitional arrangements for local authorities' which allows for councils to extend the deadline, or defer for a year, their long-term plans which would otherwise be due this July.

Minister of Local government Simeon Brown says these transitional arrangements give councils flexibility.

"We ultimately knew we were making changes as they were starting their LTP process. We wanted to provide maximum flexibility, so we put that forward as part of the proposals and ultimately legislated it when we repealed the last government's failed Three Waters."

Waipa District Mayor Susan O'Regan says the provisions came out of nowhere, but are a lifeline for her council.

She says long-term plan creation is a huge amount of work, much of that unseen in the 18 months to two years before it goes out to the public for consultation.

"So when you are kind of told 'you're not to include water services' for the bulk of [that time], and then at the 11th hour chuck it back in, it means there's a significant amount of rework."

O'Regan says Waipa district council wants to see the Local Water Done Well legislation before moving ahead with a 10-year plan. It's expected the Local Water Done Well legislation will be announced this year, and in place by mid-2025.

"Obviously we'll have an opportunity to see what the impact of those are, and to see what opportunities and options they create."

Waikato District Council has also decided to pause the release of its 10-year financial plans until next year.

Chief executive Gavin Ion says instead, the council will consult on an enhanced annual plan for the upcoming financial year.

"In effect, because we've done so much work on our LTP, the enhanced annual plan will really be the first year we had intended for the LTP."

Ion says Waikato District Council is dealing with a range of issues, including that its water provider, Watercare, signalled it wishes to withdraw from the district.

"Watercare's focus is Auckland predominantly, and with the water reform they had always seen there would come a time when the contract would need to cease."

This is fine when the council's drinking water, wastewater and stormwater services are expected to be wrapped up into 'Entity B' (which was originally going to cover the Waikato region).

Unfortunately, the council is not clear now where its water assets and services might end up. Ion says they now have a year to work through what they will do, among much uncertainty.

South Waikato District Council says it's taking advantage of one of the other options in the Water Services Acts Repeal Bill that allows for up to a three-month extension to the long-term plan statutory deadline.

"We anticipate at this stage that we will adopt a little later than normal which is 30 June; aiming currently for adoption mid- to late-July," says a council spokesperson.

"Given the complexities with LTPs and a subsequent legislation change, councils have until 30 September to adopt their LTPs this time round."

Waikato Chamber of Commerce represents businesses in all these districts. Chief executive Don Good says Waipa and Waikato are doing what's smart and prudent for their districts. But, having says that, businesses value certainty.

"We'll give them the time to do an enhanced annual plan, but we'd like to see them come back to the longer term plan which gives business a sounder footing on which to do their plans."

He says both central and local government set the environment in which businesses operated.

"And businesses need certainty if they are going to take some money out of the bank and invest it."

So far, Waipa, Waikato, Gore, Buller, Waitaki, and South Wairarapa have chosen to delay their long-term plan for a year.

More councils may yet follow suit.

-Libby Kirkwood-McLeod/RNZ.

You may also like....

3 comments

Hey.. Who cares?

Posted on 14-03-2024 23:05 | By Let's get real

When we can build level 6 eco-buildings, museums, community Whare and waterfront parks, who needs infrastructure and a healthy community...?


True

Posted on 15-03-2024 13:53 | By Kancho

No worries about our constant need of water and essential of life as we can afford so much other things even a loss making stadium. No one escapes the inflation


@Let's Get Real

Posted on 15-03-2024 13:56 | By morepork

I care. However, I can fully understand the frustration which led to your post. I think I can tolerate myopia and reluctance to change or explore new avenues opened by new technology, but I can't believe that any suggestions from outside the Commission and the Council chambers are simply binned. It is an arrogance of the highest order. With the demise of 3 Waters, water management moves up in priority and you might expect to see various options in the long term plan. My own research tells me we could solve ALL our water sourcing with a desal plant, added to existing sources, for around $90 million. And it would pay for itself over 5 years WITHOUT increasing water charges as they stand. And yet, NOBODY, official or public, has supported my posts suggesting this, or even responded to the IDEA. We get what we deserve.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.