Bayfair jewellery smash-and-grab robber sentenced

A young man has been sentenced to imprisonment after a smash-and-grab raid of a Michael Hill jewellery store in Bayfair Shopping Centre in Mount Maunganui. Photo: via video.

A judge reluctantly sending a young offender to prison following a smash and grab of a jewellery store, has told him, “we’re not giving up on you”.

Cypris Buchanan, who was 17 at the time of the offending, was sentenced to two years and four months’ imprisonment after an aggravated robbery of a Michael Hill jewellery store in Tauranga.

Judge Melinda Mason says it was unfortunate the final sentence for Cypris, after she had applied appropriate discounts, wasn’t in the two-year threshold where it could be served as home detention.

“I think you have got some really good potential when you are in a controlled environment, and you are very bright, and that you have got some good prospects,” she says.

“While we cannot give you home detention, I do hope that you continue to take advantage of courses that are available in the prison context because we are not giving up on you, this is just how it is.”

The teen had been serving a sentence of home detention when he stole a car and took part in an aggravated robbery at the Bayfair Shopping Centre store in late January 2024.

Two cars were stolen, and the group he was with were disguised when they went into the mall wearing face masks with hoods, gloves and sunglasses. Cypris was armed with a hammer and was carrying a bag to put stolen jewellery in.

As the group entered Michael Hill one of the others threatened the security guard by walking aggressively towards him holding up a screwdriver. The group then smashed glass cabinets with weapons and put stolen jewellery into bags they were carrying.

One of them held up a knife threateningly as he went towards two elderly female staff members at the front counter, while Cypris smashed the front counter’s glass cabinet and took more jewellery.

The stolen jewellery was worth $274,955.

The group then went back to the stolen vehicle and sped out of the Bayfair carpark, nearly colliding with two other vehicles and a man on a bike.

They switched to the other vehicle they had earlier stolen, which they had left on a nearby street, and were later tracked by police to the Parkvale area of Tauranga.

Police tried to stop the car but it kept going, and officers didn’t pursue it.

The police, with the aid of a police dog, later tracked the offenders.

Cypris pleaded guilty to his role in the offending.

In considering his sentence, Judge Mason heard from  Cypris’s lawyer about the “considerable difficulties” in his background and the circumstances leading up to the incident.

He had been raised in a house where there was drug and alcohol abuse, violence, and gang life.

Reports provided to the judge indicated Cypris was bright when he was engaged, and had been doing well in the school environment with a natural aptitude for sport.

He had also been doing well in home detention until his mentor, for reasons not related to Cypris, had to leave.

The judge adopted a starting point of six years’ imprisonment. She applied a 25 per cent discount for an early guilty plea and a further 20 per cent for his young age, given the prospects for rehabilitation. He was given a further 5 per cent for his remorse.

He was also given a 10 per cent discount for his background.

“That is the one about your childhood and how really when someone in your situation as a child does not know any different, then it is more likely that you are going to offend in the ways that you have than someone who did have a lot more support in their childhood.”

He received an uplift of three months for offending while on home detention.

“That is counted because you were doing really well when you had that support and that you really did fall away when that support was taken from you, but of course it is offending while you were on home detention and that uplift must be made,” says Judge Mason.

That uplift was effectively cancelled out by another discount he received.

 

6 comments

Another slap on the hand

Posted on 01-07-2024 08:10 | By Angels

Time to deal with these serious criminals that use violence.
5 years min. It’s a joke and the youth especially know it.
Time to serve justice and send a message.


@ Angels

Posted on 01-07-2024 08:53 | By Yadick

Absolutely 100% correct. I am pleased he didn't get Home D as he was already on this when he committed these new serious crimes. So he quite obviously has a total disregard for the law. His 2yr 4m sentence is automatically halved to 1yr 2m as it is under 3yrs. That's all he gets for the violent theft of hundreds of thousands of dollars of jewelry, plus the same in building damage plus the mental trauma to those around perhaps even causing life long PTSD for some.
He's a bright young lad though - REALLY?
Show me your friends and I'll show you your future.


25% Discount

Posted on 01-07-2024 09:01 | By Alfa male

Sounds like a bargain, love it when we get 25% off, but then there was 20%, then 10%, then 5% all added to it. This judge was really wanting to let this guy go with no punishment at all. Don't worry about the victims, they will deal with the full consequences ,the losses, and the costs with no discount for anything. When the perpetrators of crime are treated with more compassion than their victims something is seriously wrong.


Overit

Posted on 01-07-2024 12:52 | By overit

This business of the offenders background & reduced sentence because of it is wrong. They know they are breaking the Law, throw the book at them. The Judge might not have given up on him, but the rest of Society has.


Joke time

Posted on 01-07-2024 14:33 | By CliftonGuy

Our judicial system is a joke. Even the maximum discount of 40% is too high. Discounts should only apply when the perpetrator applies for parole and shows that he/she has started to improve themselves.


Seriously

Posted on 02-07-2024 08:33 | By earlybird

The offender was already on home detention when he broke out, stole cars and took part in an armed burglary. He didn't respect his original home detention sentence and the judge wanted to give him another home detention sentence. Unbelievable. Sorry, but the judge needs a reality check.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.