A property leadership group have suggested central Tauranga could soon be considered the 'commercial and cultural heart” of the region.
The Urban Task Force, whose board includes property developers, lawyers, construction specialists and consultants, claim the city is poised to overtake Rotorua as the 'civic heart” of the Bay of Plenty.
Members of the group believe now is the time to 'dream big”, as the city's new Elizabeth Towers project on the corner of Devonport Road continues to take shape and buildings on The Strand and Dive Crescent are demolished and cleared.
Via a statement released this week, the collective are seeking inspiration from the likes of Hamilton, with one local architect claiming Tauranga is approximately 'two years behind” New Zealand's fourth-biggest city in terms of development.
Chairman Scott Adams, who is also the managing director of land development firm Carrus, says it is time to 'shift the narrative” and 'put the bad news stories behind us” when it comes to some of the city's well-publicised issues, which include large numbers of empty retail spaces in certain areas.
'The Long Term Plan is now in place and a significant shift in momentum is underway at Tauranga City Council,” says Scott. 'It's time for the private sector to step up and join the conversation about how we shape the future of the city.
'We want this to be the place where people from all around the region come to spend time and money.”
The group say almost a $1 billion worth of development is either underway or in the pipeline in central Tauranga, and are encouraging collaborative discussions between the public and private sector about ways to revitalise the CBD.
'Both the commissioners and council CEO Marty Grenfell have signalled their intention to work proactively with the business community to forge lasting improvements for the city,” adds Scott. 'For the first time, we feel like our voice is being heard."
A budget of $500,000 has been earmarked by council to begin consultation work.
Urban Task Force member and iwi leader Buddy Mikaere claims the changing governance landscape has offered an 'enormous boost” to the city's Māori population, the group have also praised the impact of the council commissioners that were installed by Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta earlier this year.
'Iwi business interests have a unique opportunity to be heard in this new environment,” says Buddy. 'We need to use our position as the region with the largest Māori population to our advantage, and create meaningful pathways for our rangatahi through partnerships in areas such as tourism with private businesses.”
'The people of Tauranga have become frustrated and disengaged,” adds Scott. 'It's important that we bring them along on this journey and that they feel a part of the changes.
'The commissioners are prepared to make the tough decisions. Unlike elected councillors, their reputation as professionals relies upon their performance in the role. They are more driven to leave a lasting, positive legacy and we're keen to support them in that work.”
Maungatapu-based architect Mark Wassung, whose projects include Auckland International Airport, suggests taking a leaf out of Hamilton's book when it comes to the CBD's future direction.
'Tauranga is about two years behind Hamilton in terms of development,” says Mark. 'We can learn some real lessons from their set-up, in particular the Urban Design Panel that they established to oversee development.
'A similar structure here would enable us to design our inner city in a collaborative and cohesive way. 'We could also look to the many past designs proposed for the city over its history. The decades of rejected plans held on file for the Tauranga CBD should be revisited to gather common ideas that may have been previously dismissed as not right at the time.”
6 comments
And How
Posted on 13-08-2021 12:20 | By Accountable
Do the members of this Urban Task Force think the existing businesses in the CBD are to survive under the extreme upheavals that we have been and are still going through every day until the dream is reached? Why should these businesses constantly subsidise the wealthy developers who will build and then on sell to another unsuspecting investor who has been sucked in by this type of constant dribble about the CBD. It doesn't matter what is being said but unless the CBD is well provided with ample accessible parking it will constantly be a drain on anybody who is fooled into a developers dreams of a transformed utopia. It has never happened and it won't happen until the basics have been arranged in the right order, but in saying that, I believe it will all be to little to late!
Beware
Posted on 13-08-2021 12:53 | By Slim Shady
'dream big' is Task Force code for getting Ratepayers to pay for their big houses, flash cars and yachts. They want us to pump money into their pockets and this is the selling brochure. Do not fall for it.
Great to see positivity.
Posted on 13-08-2021 12:55 | By morepork
If even half of this comes off, it will be a good thing for Tauranga.
Oh oh,
Posted on 13-08-2021 15:04 | By nerak
yet more dreamers to weigh ratepayers down, guess the $500k comes out of our pockets. Perhaps the members of the UTF can themselves pay this, after all, they all have much deeper pockets than many a ratepayer. The dreaming begins here: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2108/S00155/tauranga-cbd-on-the-cusp-of-an-exciting-future.htm and this is an interesting read: https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/AK2108/S00016/110-million-of-government-funds-missing-in-action-says-new-tauranga-lobby-group.htm
Commissioners are more driven?
Posted on 13-08-2021 15:57 | By Avman
The commissioners are more driven to provide a good result for the city than councilors, Honestly? At least councilors are democratically elected and can be democratically removed if they fail to deliver. The commissioners on the other hand are government appointments that were not chosen by any of us and we cannot remove them no matter how much they stuff things up.
It seems to me...
Posted on 14-08-2021 13:12 | By morepork
...that if a development is really viable and likely to return a profit, there should be no trouble in getting it financed from the private sector. Wouldn't investors be piling in? Why does it need public funding? It's because these people never spend their own money if they can spend someone else's... I'd like to see a breakdown of how much is actually being provided by the developers, as speculation, and how much is being provided by TCC. And Accountable makes a good point: Why do existing business owners have to subsidize and be punished so other people can get rich?
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.